World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 88 13148 12376 185 182 458 28806

Albert Parés publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Albert Parés between 1953 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Albert Parés published across 73 years, from 1953 to 2025, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 30 publications in 2015. 12 of the 481 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1953 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 30. Peak 30 publications in 2015. 1953: 1 publication 1954: 0 publications 1955: 0 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 0 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 1 publication 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 8 publications 1989: 8 publications 1990: 7 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 15 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 18 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 30 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 24 publications 2018: 28 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 19 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 15 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 5 publications
1953 2025

481 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Albert Parés: publications per year, 1953 to 2025
Year Publications
1953 1
1954 0
1955 0
1956 0
1957 0
1958 0
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 1
1981 3
1982 3
1983 2
1984 3
1985 3
1986 5
1987 4
1988 8
1989 8
1990 7
1991 8
1992 8
1993 4
1994 10
1995 4
1996 15
1997 7
1998 14
1999 7
2000 18
2001 8
2002 10
2003 9
2004 8
2005 5
2006 7
2007 3
2008 10
2009 17
2010 13
2011 16
2012 10
2013 10
2014 16
2015 30
2016 13
2017 24
2018 28
2019 30
2020 19
2021 16
2022 15
2023 8
2024 7
2025 5
Total 481
Download as CSV

Albert Parés publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Parés sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 458 publications — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 458
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Albert Parés D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert Parés sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 88–89 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970 88
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Albert Parés is affiliated with the University of Barcelona in Spain and has an extensive research portfolio in the field of medicine, with a focus on hepatology. Their work is primarily centered on liver diseases and related immunological responses, treatment methodologies, and diagnostic strategies. Parés' academic contributions span multiple subfields including hepatology, epidemiology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, and oncology.

Their main research topics include:

  • Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Liver Disease Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders
  • Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
  • Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Hepatitis B Virus Studies

Albert Parés has published frequently in several scientific journals, contributing to the body of knowledge in hepatology and related fields. The main publication venues where their work appears are:

  • Journal of Hepatology
  • JHEP Reports
  • The American Journal of Gastroenterology
  • Liver International
  • Gastroenterology

Among their recent notable papers are:

  • Fibrates for Itch (FITCH) in Fibrosing Cholangiopathies: A Double-Blind, Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial (2020, Gastroenterology)
  • A randomized placebo-controlled trial of elafibranor in patients with primary biliary cholangitis and incomplete response to UDCA (2021, Journal of Hepatology)
  • Goals of Treatment for Improved Survival in Primary Biliary Cholangitis: Treatment Target Should Be Bilirubin Within the Normal Range and Normalization of Alkaline Phosphatase (2020, The American Journal of Gastroenterology)
  • Systematic review of response criteria and endpoints in autoimmune hepatitis by the International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group (2022, Journal of Hepatology)
  • A placebo-controlled randomised trial of budesonide for PBC following an insufficient response to UDCA (2020, Journal of Hepatology)

Collaboration forms a significant aspect of Parés' work, evidenced by frequent co-authors contributing substantially to their research output. Key collaborators include:

  • Gideon M. Hirschfield
  • Annarosa Floreani
  • Pietro Invernizzi
  • Christophe Corpechot
  • Douglas Thorburn

Best Publications

  • Simplified criteria for the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis

    Elke M. Hennes;Mikio Zeniya;Albert. J. Czaja;Albert Parés

  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases

    Ulrich Beuers;Kirsten M. Boberg;Roger W. Chapman;Olivier Chazouillères

  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on nutrition in chronic liver disease

    Manuela Merli;Annalisa Berzigotti;Shira Zelber-Sagi;Srinivasan Dasarathy

  • Excellent Long-Term Survival in Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Biochemical Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

    Albert Parés;Llorenç Caballería;Juan Rodés

  • S-Adenosylmethionine in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter clinical trial

    Jose M Mato;Javier Cámara;Javier Fernández de Paz;Llorenç Caballería

  • Efficacy of obeticholic acid in patients with primary biliary cirrhosis and inadequate response to ursodeoxycholic acid

    Gideon M. Hirschfield;Andrew Mason;Velimir Luketic;Velimir Luketic;Keith Lindor;Keith Lindor

  • Extracorporeal albumin dialysis with the molecular adsorbent recirculating system in acute-on-chronic liver failure: the RELIEF trial

    Rafael Bañares;Rafael Bañares;Frederik Nevens;Fin Stolze Larsen;Rajiv Jalan

  • Levels of alkaline phosphatase and bilirubin are surrogate end points of outcomes of patients with primary biliary cirrhosis: An international follow-up study

    Willem J. Lammers;Henk R. van Buuren;Gideon M. Hirschfield;Harry L.A. Janssen

  • Changing nomenclature for PBC: from ‘cirrhosis’ to ‘cholangitis’

    Ulrich H W Beuers;M Eric Gershwin;Robert G Gish;Pietro Luigi Invernizzi

  • Effects of silymarin in alcoholic patients with cirrhosis of the liver: results of a controlled, double-blind, randomized and multicenter trial

    Albert Parés;Ramón Planas;Miguel Torres;Joan Caballería

  • Patient Age, Sex, and Inflammatory Bowel Disease Phenotype Associate With Course of Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis

    Tobias J. Weismüller;Tobias J. Weismüller;Palak J. Trivedi;Annika Bergquist;Mohamad Imam;Mohamad Imam

  • Development and Validation of a Scoring System to Predict Outcomes of Patients With Primary Biliary Cirrhosis Receiving Ursodeoxycholic Acid Therapy

    Willem J. Lammers;Gideon M. Hirschfield;Christophe Corpechot;Frederik Nevens

  • Short- and long-term outcome of severe alcohol-induced hepatitis treated with steroids or enteral nutrition: a multicenter randomized trial.

    Eduard Cabré;Pilar Rodríguez-Iglesias;Joan Caballería;Joan C. Quer

  • Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies nine new risk loci for primary sclerosing cholangitis

    Jimmy Z Liu;Johannes Roksund Hov;Trine Folseraas;Trine Folseraas;Eva Ellinghaus

  • Histological course of alcoholic hepatitis: Influence of abstinence, sex and extent of hepatic damage

    Albert Parés;Joan Caballería;Miquel Bruguera;Miquel Torres

  • Long-term effects of ursodeoxycholic acid in primary biliary cirrhosis: results of a double-blind controlled multicentric trial

    Albert Parés;Llorenç Caballería;Juan Rodés;Miquel Bruguera

  • Cholangiocarcinoma in primary sclerosing cholangitis: risk factors and clinical presentation.

    K. M. Boberg;A. Bergquist;S. Mitchell;A. Pares

  • Genome-wide association study of primary sclerosing cholangitis identifies new risk loci and quantifies the genetic relationship with inflammatory bowel disease

    Sun Gou Ji;Brian D. Juran;Sören Mucha;Trine Folseraas

  • Hepatitis C virus antibodies in chronic alcoholic patients: association with severity of liver injury.

    Albert Parés;Josep María Barrera;Joan Caballería;Guadalupe Ercilla

  • Dense genotyping of immune-related disease regions identifies nine new risk loci for primary sclerosing cholangitis

    Jimmy Z. Liu;Johannes Roksund Hov;Trine Folseraas;Eva Ellinghaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Gideon M. Hirschfield
Gideon M. Hirschfield University Health Network
Juan Rodés
Juan Rodés University of Barcelona
Bettina E. Hansen
Bettina E. Hansen University Health Network
Keith D. Lindor
Keith D. Lindor Arizona State University
Cyriel Y. Ponsioen
Cyriel Y. Ponsioen University of Amsterdam
Kris V. Kowdley
Kris V. Kowdley Washington State University
Harry L.A. Janssen
Harry L.A. Janssen Erasmus University Rotterdam
Kirsten Muri Boberg
Kirsten Muri Boberg University of Oslo
Roger W. Chapman
Roger W. Chapman University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative healthcare pathways can open doors to diverse career options within medicine. For those seeking a faster entry point into the healthcare workforce, 6 month lpn program options offer accelerated training to become a Licensed Practical Nurse. This route is ideal for students looking to start working and gaining hands-on experience quickly.

If you're interested in advanced practice roles, there are multiple online options available. Aspiring psychiatric nurse practitioners can consider enrolling in psych np online programs. These programs combine flexibility with in-depth psychiatric and mental health expertise, preparing graduates for high-demand clinical positions.

For those drawn to the administrative side of healthcare, a variety of online degrees offer affordable entry points. Pursuing the cheapest online health science degree helps students save on tuition while building a strong foundation in health systems and policy. For career advancement, consider the cheapest online mha programs, which prepare graduates for leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and public health organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Albert Parés

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles