World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 30 9042 8408 2921 2586 105 5456

David E. Rupp publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David E. Rupp between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David E. Rupp published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 6.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2019. 10 of the 209 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2019. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 15 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 17 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 5 publications
1995 2025

209 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David E. Rupp: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 3
2002 4
2003 0
2004 3
2005 4
2006 3
2007 5
2008 6
2009 3
2010 3
2011 9
2012 10
2013 9
2014 12
2015 16
2016 15
2017 14
2018 11
2019 22
2020 11
2021 17
2022 12
2023 5
2024 5
2025 5
Total 209
Download as CSV

David E. Rupp publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 98–107 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 105 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404 105
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

David E. Rupp D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 30 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144 30
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David E. Rupp is a researcher affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States, with a primary focus on Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple specialized areas including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics include Fire effects on ecosystems, Climate variability and models, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Cryospheric studies and observations, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Flood Risk Assessment and Management.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Compound Extremes Drive the Western Oregon Wildfires of September 2020 (2021), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Anthropogenic Influence on Recent Severe Autumn Fire Weather in the West Coast of the United States (2022), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation (2020), published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Climate change alters flood magnitudes and mechanisms in climatically-diverse headwaters across the northwestern United States (2020), published in Environmental Research Letters
  • New snow metrics for a warming world (2021), published in Hydrological Processes

Frequent collaborators include Bart Nijssen, Anton Kruger, John T. Abatzoglou, Sihan Li, and Kumud Acharya.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in scholarly venues such as:

  • Water Resources Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models

    Martyn P. Clark;Andrew G. Slater;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods

  • Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model

    Martyn P. Clark;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods;Xiaogu Zheng

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • Seasonal Climate Variability and Change in the Pacific Northwest of the United States

    John T. Abatzoglou;David E. Rupp;Philip W. Mote

  • Explaining Extreme Events of 2012 from a Climate Perspective

    T.C. Peterson;L.V. Alexander;M.R. Allen;J.A. Anel;J.A. Anel

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • On the use of the Boussinesq equation for interpreting recession hydrographs from sloping aquifers

    David E. Rupp;David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale

    Martyn P Clark;David E Rupp;Ross A Woods;H J Tromp-van Meerveld

  • The importance of hydraulic groundwater theory in catchment hydrology: The legacy of Wilfried Brutsaert and Jean‐Yves Parlange

    Peter A. Troch;Alexis Berne;Patrick Bogaart;Ciaran Harman

  • Information, artifacts, and noise in dQ/dt − Q recession analysis

    David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Time scale and intensity dependency in multiplicative cascades for temporal rainfall disaggregation.

    David E. Rupp;David E. Rupp;Richard F. Keim;Mina Ossiander;Marcela Brugnach

  • How Do Modeling Decisions Affect the Spread Among Hydrologic Climate Change Projections? Exploring a Large Ensemble of Simulations Across a Diversity of Hydroclimates

    Oriana S. Chegwidden;Bart Nijssen;David E. Rupp;Jeffrey R. Arnold

  • Compound Extremes Drive the Western Oregon Wildfires of September 2020

    John T. Abatzoglou;David E. Rupp;Larry W. O'Neill;Mojtaba Sadegh

  • Perspectives on the causes of exceptionally low 2015 snowpack in the western United States

    Philip W. Mote;David E. Rupp;Sihan Li;Darrin J. Sharp

  • Detection and Attribution of Observed Changes in Northern Hemisphere Spring Snow Cover

    David E. Rupp;Philip W. Mote;Nathaniel L. Bindoff;Peter A. Stott

  • Drainage of a horizontal Boussinesq aquifer with a power law hydraulic conductivity profile

    David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Spatial variability of hydrological processes and model structure diagnostics in a 50 km2 catchment

    Hilary K. McMillan;Myriam Gueguen;Elisabeth Grimon;Ross Woods

  • Near-future forest vulnerability to drought and fire varies across the western United States.

    Polly C. Buotte;Samuel Levis;Beverly E. Law;Tara W. Hudiburg

  • Projections of 21st century climate of the Columbia River Basin

    David E. Rupp;John T. Abatzoglou;Philip W. Mote

  • Improved streamflow recession parameter estimation with attention to calculation of − dQ/dt

    Clément Roques;David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Analytical assessment and parameter estimation of a low-dimensional groundwater model.

    David E. Rupp;Jochen Schmidt;Ross A. Woods;Vincent J. Bidwell

  • Hydrological Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Use of Streamflow Observations to Update States in a Distributed Hydrological Model

    R. P. Ibbitt;M. P. Clark;R. A. Woods;X. Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Selker
John S. Selker Oregon State University
Philip W. Mote
Philip W. Mote Oregon State University
Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Ross Woods
Ross Woods University of Bristol
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Richard Betts
Richard Betts University of Exeter
John T. Abatzoglou
John T. Abatzoglou University of California, Merced
Jim Freer
Jim Freer University of Bristol
Friederike E. L. Otto
Friederike E. L. Otto University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths that often require complementary skills and knowledge. Many students explore interdisciplinary online degrees to enhance their expertise and adaptability in the job market.

For those interested in creative aspects or communicating scientific findings, exploring the best online mfa programs can offer valuable skills. These programs often focus on storytelling and visual arts, which can be crucial for public outreach and education in Earth Science fields.

Additionally, managing teams and projects is common in scientific careers. An online masters in human resource management can prepare professionals to handle organizational challenges effectively, improving leadership and operational success.

Older adults returning to education may find a range of suitable options tailored to their needs. The best degrees for older adults highlight flexible, supportive programs designed to accommodate diverse life experiences and goals.

Moreover, for those interested in information science, programs from ala-accredited schools offer reputable pathways to careers in libraries, archives, and data management, complementing Earth Science research and resource preservation.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Rupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles