World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

David E. Rupp publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

David E. Rupp D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David E. Rupp sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

David E. Rupp is a researcher affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States, with a primary focus on Environmental Science. Their work spans multiple specialized areas including Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, and Surgery.

The scientist's research topics include Fire effects on ecosystems, Climate variability and models, Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Cryospheric studies and observations, Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations, Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics, and Flood Risk Assessment and Management.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Compound Extremes Drive the Western Oregon Wildfires of September 2020 (2021), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Anthropogenic Influence on Recent Severe Autumn Fire Weather in the West Coast of the United States (2022), published in Geophysical Research Letters
  • Recession analysis revisited: impacts of climate on parameter estimation (2020), published in Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Climate change alters flood magnitudes and mechanisms in climatically-diverse headwaters across the northwestern United States (2020), published in Environmental Research Letters
  • New snow metrics for a warming world (2021), published in Hydrological Processes

Frequent collaborators include Bart Nijssen, Anton Kruger, John T. Abatzoglou, Sihan Li, and Kumud Acharya.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in scholarly venues such as:

  • Water Resources Research
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Climate Dynamics
  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Geophysical Research Letters

Best Publications

  • Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models

    Martyn P. Clark;Andrew G. Slater;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods

  • Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model

    Martyn P. Clark;David E. Rupp;Ross A. Woods;Xiaogu Zheng

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • Seasonal Climate Variability and Change in the Pacific Northwest of the United States

    John T. Abatzoglou;David E. Rupp;Philip W. Mote

  • Explaining Extreme Events of 2012 from a Climate Perspective

    T.C. Peterson;L.V. Alexander;M.R. Allen;J.A. Anel;J.A. Anel

  • A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies

    Martyn P. Clark;Bart Nijssen;Jessica D. Lundquist;Dmitri Kavetski

  • On the use of the Boussinesq equation for interpreting recession hydrographs from sloping aquifers

    David E. Rupp;David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Consistency between hydrological models and field observations: linking processes at the hillslope scale to hydrological responses at the watershed scale

    Martyn P Clark;David E Rupp;Ross A Woods;H J Tromp-van Meerveld

  • The importance of hydraulic groundwater theory in catchment hydrology: The legacy of Wilfried Brutsaert and Jean‐Yves Parlange

    Peter A. Troch;Alexis Berne;Patrick Bogaart;Ciaran Harman

  • Information, artifacts, and noise in dQ/dt − Q recession analysis

    David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Time scale and intensity dependency in multiplicative cascades for temporal rainfall disaggregation.

    David E. Rupp;David E. Rupp;Richard F. Keim;Mina Ossiander;Marcela Brugnach

  • How Do Modeling Decisions Affect the Spread Among Hydrologic Climate Change Projections? Exploring a Large Ensemble of Simulations Across a Diversity of Hydroclimates

    Oriana S. Chegwidden;Bart Nijssen;David E. Rupp;Jeffrey R. Arnold

  • Compound Extremes Drive the Western Oregon Wildfires of September 2020

    John T. Abatzoglou;David E. Rupp;Larry W. O'Neill;Mojtaba Sadegh

  • Perspectives on the causes of exceptionally low 2015 snowpack in the western United States

    Philip W. Mote;David E. Rupp;Sihan Li;Darrin J. Sharp

  • Detection and Attribution of Observed Changes in Northern Hemisphere Spring Snow Cover

    David E. Rupp;Philip W. Mote;Nathaniel L. Bindoff;Peter A. Stott

  • Drainage of a horizontal Boussinesq aquifer with a power law hydraulic conductivity profile

    David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Spatial variability of hydrological processes and model structure diagnostics in a 50 km2 catchment

    Hilary K. McMillan;Myriam Gueguen;Elisabeth Grimon;Ross Woods

  • Near-future forest vulnerability to drought and fire varies across the western United States.

    Polly C. Buotte;Samuel Levis;Beverly E. Law;Tara W. Hudiburg

  • Projections of 21st century climate of the Columbia River Basin

    David E. Rupp;John T. Abatzoglou;Philip W. Mote

  • Improved streamflow recession parameter estimation with attention to calculation of − dQ/dt

    Clément Roques;David E. Rupp;John S. Selker

  • Analytical assessment and parameter estimation of a low-dimensional groundwater model.

    David E. Rupp;Jochen Schmidt;Ross A. Woods;Vincent J. Bidwell

  • Hydrological Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter: Use of Streamflow Observations to Update States in a Distributed Hydrological Model

    R. P. Ibbitt;M. P. Clark;R. A. Woods;X. Zheng

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Selker
John S. Selker Oregon State University
Philip W. Mote
Philip W. Mote Oregon State University
Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Ross Woods
Ross Woods University of Bristol
Myles R. Allen
Myles R. Allen University of Oxford
Bart Nijssen
Bart Nijssen University of Washington
Richard Betts
Richard Betts University of Exeter
John T. Abatzoglou
John T. Abatzoglou University of California, Merced
Jim Freer
Jim Freer University of Bristol
Friederike E. L. Otto
Friederike E. L. Otto University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science opens doors to diverse career paths that often require complementary skills and knowledge. Many students explore interdisciplinary online degrees to enhance their expertise and adaptability in the job market.

For those interested in creative aspects or communicating scientific findings, exploring the best online mfa programs can offer valuable skills. These programs often focus on storytelling and visual arts, which can be crucial for public outreach and education in Earth Science fields.

Additionally, managing teams and projects is common in scientific careers. An online masters in human resource management can prepare professionals to handle organizational challenges effectively, improving leadership and operational success.

Older adults returning to education may find a range of suitable options tailored to their needs. The best degrees for older adults highlight flexible, supportive programs designed to accommodate diverse life experiences and goals.

Moreover, for those interested in information science, programs from ala-accredited schools offer reputable pathways to careers in libraries, archives, and data management, complementing Earth Science research and resource preservation.

Best Scientists Citing David E. Rupp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles