World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
64
Citations
15775
World Ranking
2314
National Ranking
66

Remko Uijlenhoet publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Remko Uijlenhoet sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 453 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Remko Uijlenhoet D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Remko Uijlenhoet sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Remko Uijlenhoet is affiliated with Delft University of Technology in the Netherlands and conducts research primarily in the fields of Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their research work spans subfields including Atmospheric Science, Global and Planetary Change, Environmental Engineering, Water Science and Technology, and Pollution.

The scientist's research covers key topics such as:

  • Precipitation Measurement and Analysis
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Soil Moisture and Remote Sensing
  • Climate variability and models

Recent publications include:

  • Spatial and Temporal Evaluation of Radar Rainfall Nowcasting Techniques on 1,533 Events, 2020, Water Resources Research
  • Uncertainty assessment of satellite remote-sensing-based evapotranspiration estimates: a systematic review of methods and gaps, 2023, Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
  • Rainfall Nowcasting Using Commercial Microwave Links, 2020, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Hydrological application of radar rainfall nowcasting in the Netherlands, 2020, Environment International
  • Daily flow simulation in Thailand Part I: Testing a distributed hydrological model with seamless parameter maps based on global data, 2021, Journal of Hydrology Regional Studies

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Remko Uijlenhoet are:

  • Aart Overeem (22 publications)
  • Hidde Leijnse (16 publications)
  • Tim van Emmerik (13 publications)
  • Ruben Imhoff (12 publications)
  • Claudia Brauer (12 publications)

The most common publication venues include:

  • Hydrology and Earth System Sciences (11 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (6 publications)
  • Atmospheric Measurement Techniques (5 publications)
  • Journal of Hydrometeorology (5 publications)
  • Water Resources Research (4 publications)

In 2020, Remko Uijlenhoet was recognized as a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU).

Best Publications

  • Twenty-three unsolved problems in hydrology (UPH)–a community perspective

    Günter Blöschl;Marc F.P. Bierkens;Antonio Chambel;Christophe Cudennec

  • Drought in the Anthropocene

    Anne F. Van Loon;Tom Gleeson;Julian Clark;Albert I J M Van Dijk

  • The Future of Earth Observation in Hydrology.

    Matthew F. McCabe;Matthew Rodell;Douglas E. Alsdorf;Diego G. Miralles

  • Drought in a human-modified world : reframing drought definitions, understanding, and analysis approaches

    Anne F. Van Loon;Kerstin Stahl;Giuliano Di Baldassarre;Julian Clark

  • A simple energy budget algorithm for the snowmelt runoff model.

    William P. Kustas;Albert Rango;Remko Uijlenhoet

  • HYMEX , a 10-year Multidisciplinary Program on the mediterranean water cycle.

    P. Drobinski;Véronique Ducrocq;P. Alpert;E. Anagnostou

  • The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism

    Martyn P. Clark;Marc F. P. Bierkens;Luis Samaniego;Ross A. Woods

  • Country-wide rainfall maps from cellular communication networks

    Aart Overeem;Hidde Leijnse;Remko Uijlenhoet

  • Rainfall measurement using radio links from cellular communication networks

    H. Leijnse;R. Uijlenhoet;J. N. M. Stricker

  • Measuring urban rainfall using microwave links from commercial cellular communication networks

    A. Overeem;H. Leijnse;R. Uijlenhoet

  • How climate seasonality modifies drought duration and deficit

    A. F. Van Loon;E. Tijdeman;N. Wanders;H. A. J. Van Lanen

  • Variability of Raindrop Size Distributions in a Squall Line and Implications for Radar Rainfall Estimation

    Remko Uijlenhoet;Matthias Steiner;James A. Smith

  • Quantifying catchment-scale mixing and its effect on time-varying travel time distributions

    Y. van der Velde;P. J. J. F. Torfs;S. E. A. T. M. van der Zee;R. Uijlenhoet

  • Raindrop size distributions and radar reflectivity–rain rate relationships for radar hydrology

    Remko Uijlenhoet;Remko Uijlenhoet

  • Crowdsourcing urban air temperatures from smartphone battery temperatures

    A. Overeem;A. Overeem;J. C. R. Robinson;H. Leijnse;G. J. Steeneveld

  • Measurements and Observations in the XXI century (MOXXI): innovation and multi-disciplinarity to sense the hydrological cycle

    Flavia Tauro;John Selker;Nick van de Giesen;Tommaso Abrate

  • Satellite and in situ observations for advancing global earth surface modelling: A review

    Gianpaolo Balsamo;Anna Agusti-Panareda;Clement Albergel;Gabriele Arduini

  • Microwave link rainfall estimation: Effects of link length and frequency, temporal sampling, power resolution, and wet antenna attenuation

    H. Leijnse;R. Uijlenhoet;J.N.M. Stricker

  • A consistent rainfall parameterization based on the exponential raindrop size distribution

    R. Uijlenhoet;J.N.M. Stricker

  • Amplification of wildfire area burnt by hydrological drought in the humid tropics

    Muh Taufik;Muh Taufik;Paul J. J. F. Torfs;Remko Uijlenhoet;Philip D. Jones;Philip D. Jones

  • A Microphysical Interpretation of Radar Reflectivity–Rain Rate Relationships

    Matthias Steiner;James A. Smith;Remko Uijlenhoet

  • Long term country-wide rainfall maps from cellular communication networks

    A. Overeem;H. Leijnse;R. Uijlenhoet

Frequent Co-Authors

Adriaan J. Teuling
Adriaan J. Teuling Wageningen University & Research
Alexis Berne
Alexis Berne École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Albrecht Weerts
Albrecht Weerts Wageningen University & Research
Peter Troch
Peter Troch University of Arizona
Gert-Jan Steeneveld
Gert-Jan Steeneveld Wageningen University & Research
Martyn P. Clark
Martyn P. Clark University of Saskatchewan
Marc F. P. Bierkens
Marc F. P. Bierkens Utrecht University
Guy Delrieu
Guy Delrieu Grenoble Alpes University
Valentijn R. N. Pauwels
Valentijn R. N. Pauwels Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can broaden career opportunities. Many programs offer flexible and affordable options, such as the most affordable online general studies degree programs. These programs provide a solid interdisciplinary foundation, often making them suitable for those looking to ease into more specialized fields.

For learners seeking a straightforward entry point, some institutions provide easy bachelor degrees that focus on foundational skills and essential knowledge. While "easy" can be subjective, these programs generally emphasize accessibility without compromising critical competencies necessary for environmental careers.

Specialized fields like Geoscience and Geology are increasingly available through top-tier geoscience online degree programs. These focus on Earth systems and processes, complementing studies in Environmental Sciences and leading to careers in research, natural resource management, and environmental consulting.

Additionally, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) are vital for environmental analysis and decision-making. Pursuing one of the best GIS degree programs equips students with powerful tools for data visualization and spatial problem-solving, skills highly sought after by environmental agencies and organizations worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing Remko Uijlenhoet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles