World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 39 9768 9487 17 17 498 6505

Zakaria Maamar publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Zakaria Maamar between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Zakaria Maamar published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 16.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 39 publications in 2009. 18 of the 517 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 39. Peak 39 publications in 2009. 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 5 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 15 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 19 publications 2005: 31 publications 2006: 34 publications 2007: 36 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 39 publications 2010: 29 publications 2011: 32 publications 2012: 15 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 13 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 20 publications 2020: 22 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 10 publications
1994 2025

517 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Zakaria Maamar: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 1
1995 0
1996 1
1997 5
1998 0
1999 5
2000 5
2001 6
2002 15
2003 14
2004 19
2005 31
2006 34
2007 36
2008 32
2009 39
2010 29
2011 32
2012 15
2013 8
2014 18
2015 19
2016 13
2017 15
2018 17
2019 20
2020 22
2021 24
2022 12
2023 12
2024 8
2025 10
Total 517
Download as CSV

Zakaria Maamar publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zakaria Maamar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 492–501 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 498 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62 498
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Zakaria Maamar D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Zakaria Maamar sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 39 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 39
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Zakaria Maamar is affiliated with Zayed University in the United Arab Emirates. Their research primarily spans the fields of Computer Science and Business, Management and Accounting, with a total of 104 and 21 publications respectively. Within these areas, Maamar's work delves into specific subfields such as Computer Networks and Communications, Information Systems, Management Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, and Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition.

The research topics addressed by Zakaria Maamar encompass a range of contemporary technological and management issues. These include:

  • IoT and Edge/Fog Computing
  • Service-Oriented Architecture and Web Services
  • Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
  • Cloud Computing and Resource Management
  • Business Process Modeling and Analysis
  • Software System Performance and Reliability
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Maamar's recent publications highlight a focus on machine learning, resource allocation, and network management within IoT and cloud-enabled systems. Representative recent papers include:

  • "IoT-Enabled Flood Severity Prediction via Ensemble Machine Learning Models," 2020, IEEE Access
  • "A multi-model based microservices identification approach," 2021, Journal of Systems Architecture
  • "Intelligent Control and Security of Fog Resources in Healthcare Systems via a Cognitive Fog Model," 2020, ACM Transactions on Internet Technology
  • "Toward a correct and optimal time-aware cloud resource allocation to business processes," 2020, Future Generation Computer Systems
  • "Congestion avoidance in wireless sensor network using software defined network," 2021, Computing

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Maamar include Noura Faci, Fadwa Yahya, Thar Baker, Djamal Benslimane, and Mohammed Al-Khafajiy. These collaborative networks suggest a multidisciplinary approach across computer science and information systems domains.

Publication venues where Maamar's work regularly appears include Computing, Service Oriented Computing and Applications, Internet of Things, Future Generation Computer Systems, and Computer Science and Information Systems. These outlets reflect a consistent contribution to both theoretical and applied research in computing and systems engineering.

In addition to journal articles, Zakaria Maamar has contributed to book publications with Springer Science+Business Media, particularly in the area of Web Information Systems Engineering, with works published in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Toward an agent-based and context-oriented approach for Web services composition

    Z. Maamar;S.K. Mostefaoui;H. Yahyaoui

  • What can context do for web services

    Zakaria Maamar;Djamal Benslimane;Nanjangud C. Narendra

  • Towards an Approach forWeb services Substitution

    Yehia Taher;Djamal Benslimane;Marie-christine Fauvet;Zakaria Maamar

  • Improving Fog Computing Performance via Fog-2-Fog Collaboration

    Mohammed Al-khafajiy;Thar Baker;Hilal Al-Libawy;Zakaria Maamar

  • A context-based mediation approach to compose semantic Web services

    Michael Mrissa;Chirine Ghedira;Djamal Benslimane;Zakaria Maamar

  • Why Web Services Need Social Networks

    Zakaria Maamar;Hakim Hacid;Michael N Huhns

  • Towards an Approach for Web services Substitution

    Yehia Taher;Djamal Benslimane;Marie-Christine Fauvet;Zakaria Maamar

  • Configurable Composition and Adaptive Provisioning of Web Services

    Q.Z. Sheng;B. Benatallah;Z. Maamar;A.H.H. Ngu

  • Integration of workflow and agent technology for business process management

    Yuhong Yan;Z. Maamar;Weiming Shen

  • Using Social Networks for Web Services Discovery

    Z. Maamar;P. Santos;L. Wives;Y. Badr

  • Enabling Personalized Composition and Adaptive Provisioning of Web Services

    Quan Z. Sheng;Boualem Benatallah;Zakaria Maamar;Marlon Dumas

  • LinkedWS: A Novel Web Services Discovery Model Based on the Metaphor of Social Networks

    Zakaria Maamar;Leandro Krug Wives;Youakim Badr;Said Elnaffar

  • On the Enhancement of BPEL Engines for Self-Healing Composite Web Services

    S. Subramanian;P. Thiran;N.C. Narendra;G.K. Mostefaoui

  • On Composite Web Services Provisioning in an Environment of Fixed and Mobile Computing Resources

    Zakaria Maamar;Quan Z. Sheng;Boualem Benatallah

  • Context for Personalized Web Services

    Z. Maamar;S.K. Mostefaoui;Q.H. Mahmoud

  • A Petri Net Approach to Analyzing Behavioral Compatibility and Similarity of Web Services

    Xitong Li;Yushun Fan;Q Z Sheng;Z Maamar

  • Service composition: concepts, techniques, tools and trends

    Boualem Benatallah;Remco M. Dijkman;Marlon Dumas;Zakaria Maamar

  • Toward intelligent business objects

    Zakaria Maamar;Jeff Sutherland

  • An Argumentation Framework for Communities of Web Services

    J. Bentahar;Z. Maamar;D. Benslimane;P. Thiran

  • An Approach to Engineer Communities of Web Services: Concepts, architecture, operation, and deployment

    Zakaria Maamar;Sattanathan Subramanian;Philippe Thiran;Djamal Benslimane

Frequent Co-Authors

Quan Z. Sheng
Quan Z. Sheng Macquarie University
Thar Baker
Thar Baker University of Khorfakkan
Qusay H. Mahmoud
Qusay H. Mahmoud University of Ontario Institute of Technology
Jamal Bentahar
Jamal Bentahar Concordia University
Boualem Benatallah
Boualem Benatallah Dublin City University
Sherif Sakr
Sherif Sakr University of Tartu
Michael N. Huhns
Michael N. Huhns University of South Carolina
Sherali Zeadally
Sherali Zeadally University of Kentucky
Lina Yao
Lina Yao Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Rajkumar Buyya
Rajkumar Buyya University of Melbourne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are considering studying Computer Science in the USA, it’s helpful to explore other programs that can support your professional growth and broaden your career path. Many students look into the best college majors for the future to find areas with high demand, solid salaries, and technological relevance.

Graduate education can also enhance job opportunities. For those seeking to continue their studies, researching what's the easiest masters degree to get can help balance workload and career speed, especially for working professionals. If you’re considering advancing to the highest academic levels, there are now many affordable doctoral programs available online, making it more feasible to achieve your goals without massive debt.

For those interested in educational leadership roles, fast options exist like fastest online edd programs. Exploring these related degrees can open new pathways—whether you want to deepen your technical knowledge or transition into academia, management, or research.

Best Scientists Citing Zakaria Maamar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles