World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14618 13768 1341 1283 478 26327

David Jones publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Jones between 1979 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Jones published across 48 years, from 1979 to 2026, averaging 24 papers a year. Output peaked at 64 publications in 1999. 3 of the 1,150 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1979 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 64. Peak 64 publications in 1999. 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 1 publication 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 44 publications 1989: 47 publications 1990: 48 publications 1991: 53 publications 1992: 48 publications 1993: 43 publications 1994: 50 publications 1995: 52 publications 1996: 49 publications 1997: 57 publications 1998: 55 publications 1999: 64 publications 2000: 50 publications 2001: 53 publications 2002: 44 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 15 publications 2008: 26 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 27 publications 2011: 16 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 31 publications 2017: 21 publications 2018: 26 publications 2019: 30 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications 2026: 1 publication
1979 2026

1,150 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Jones: publications per year, 1979 to 2026
Year Publications
1979 1
1980 0
1981 1
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 44
1989 47
1990 48
1991 53
1992 48
1993 43
1994 50
1995 52
1996 49
1997 57
1998 55
1999 64
2000 50
2001 53
2002 44
2003 12
2004 12
2005 7
2006 12
2007 15
2008 26
2009 15
2010 27
2011 16
2012 13
2013 15
2014 18
2015 29
2016 31
2017 21
2018 26
2019 30
2020 23
2021 29
2022 2
2023 4
2024 2
2025 2
2026 1
Total 1,150
Download as CSV

David Jones publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 478 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 478
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David Jones D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Jones sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

David Jones is affiliated with Newcastle University in the United Kingdom. Their expertise lies primarily within the field of Engineering, with a focus on Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, Management of Technology and Innovation, Information Systems, and Epidemiology.

Their research addresses a range of topics including Manufacturing Process and Optimization, Design Education and Practice, Digital Transformation in Industry, Product Development and Customization, Engineering Education and Technology, Flexible and Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems, and Usability and User Interface Design.

David Jones has contributed to several publications, focusing on various aspects of digital manufacturing and product development. Recent papers authored by Jones include:

  • Characterising the Digital Twin: A systematic literature review, 2020, CIRP journal of manufacturing science and technology
  • Towards integrated version control of virtual and physical artefacts in new product development: inspirations from software engineering and the digital twin paradigm, 2021, Procedia CIRP
  • Model-based information navigation for engineering documents, 2020, Computers in Industry

These papers explore the interplay between digital tools and manufacturing processes, information navigation in engineering contexts, and the evolving concept of the digital twin.

David Jones regularly collaborates with other researchers in the field. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Ben Hicks
  • Chris Snider
  • Mark Goudswaard
  • James Gopsill
  • Aydin Nassehi

Their work has appeared in multiple publication venues, reflecting the multidisciplinary nature of their research. The most common venues for Jones's publications are:

  • Procedia CIRP
  • Computers in Industry
  • Proceedings of the Design Society
  • Digital Twin
  • Comparative and Continental Philosophy

Jones's contributions mainly intersect with engineering disciplines that emphasize manufacturing and design processes as well as digital innovations within industrial contexts. Their publication record and co-author network indicate active engagement in ongoing research communities centered on manufacturing science and digital transformation.

Best Publications

  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of cholestatic liver diseases

    Ulrich Beuers;Kirsten M. Boberg;Roger W. Chapman;Olivier Chazouillères

  • EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis

    Gideon M. Hirschfield;Ulrich Beuers;Christophe Corpechot;Pietro Invernizzi

  • A Placebo-Controlled Trial of Obeticholic Acid in Primary Biliary Cholangitis

    F. Nevens;P. Andreone;G. Mazzella;S. I. Strasser

  • Natural history of early primary biliary cirrhosis

    Jane V Metcalf;Harriet C Mitchison;Jeremy M Palmer;David E Jones

  • Changing nomenclature for PBC: from ‘cirrhosis’ to ‘cholangitis’

    Ulrich H W Beuers;M Eric Gershwin;Robert G Gish;Pietro Luigi Invernizzi

  • Genome-wide association study identifies 12 new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis

    George F Mells;James A B Floyd;Katherine I Morley;Katherine I Morley;Heather J Cordell

  • FilmArray, an automated nested multiplex PCR system for multi-pathogen detection: development and application to respiratory tract infection.

    Mark A. Poritz;Anne J. Blaschke;Carrie L. Byington;Lindsay Meyers

  • Sex and Age Are Determinants of the Clinical Phenotype of Primary Biliary Cirrhosis and Response to Ursodeoxycholic Acid

    Marco Carbone;George F. Mells;Greta Pells;Muhammad F. Dawwas

  • The UK-PBC risk scores: Derivation and validation of a scoring system for long-term prediction of end-stage liver disease in primary biliary cholangitis

    Marco Carbone;Stephen J. Sharp;Steve Flack;Dimitrios Paximadas

  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis

    Jessica K Dyson;Ulrich Beuers;David E J Jones;Ansgar W Lohse

  • Basal forebrain degeneration precedes and predicts the cortical spread of Alzheimer's pathology.

    Taylor W. Schmitz;R. Nathan Spreng;Michael W. Weiner;Paul Aisen

  • International genome-wide meta-analysis identifies new primary biliary cirrhosis risk loci and targetable pathogenic pathways

    Heather J. Cordell;Younghun Han;George F. Mells;Yafang Li

  • The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines

    Gideon M Hirschfield;Jessica K Dyson;Graeme J M Alexander;Graeme J M Alexander;Michael H Chapman

  • Dense fine-mapping study identifies new susceptibility loci for primary biliary cirrhosis

    Jimmy Z Liu;Mohamed A Almarri;Daniel J Gaffney;George F Mells

  • Epithelial-mesenchymal transition contributes to portal tract fibrogenesis during human chronic liver disease.

    Karolina A Rygiel;Helen Robertson;Helen L Marshall;Marcin Pekalski

  • Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA-4) gene polymorphisms and susceptibility to type 1 autoimmune hepatitis.

    Kosh Agarwal;Albert J. Czaja;David E. Jones;Peter T. Donaldson

  • Alcoholic liver disease: new insights into mechanisms and preventative strategies

    Stephen Stewart;David Jones;Chris P Day

  • A randomized trial of obeticholic acid monotherapy in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

    Kris V. Kowdley;Velimir Luketic;Roger Chapman;Gideon M. Hirschfield

  • Familial primary biliary cirrhosis reassessed: a geographically-based population study.

    David Ej Jones;Fiona E Watt;Jane V Metcalf;Margaret F Bassendine

  • Development, validation, and evaluation of the PBC-40, a disease specific health related quality of life measure for primary biliary cirrhosis

    A Jacoby;A Rannard;D Buck;N Bhala

Frequent Co-Authors

John A. Kirby
John A. Kirby Newcastle University
Margaret F. Bassendine
Margaret F. Bassendine Newcastle University
Gideon M. Hirschfield
Gideon M. Hirschfield University Health Network
Oliver F. W. James
Oliver F. W. James Newcastle University
Christopher P. Day
Christopher P. Day Newcastle University
Graeme J. M. Alexander
Graeme J. M. Alexander University College London
Alastair D. Burt
Alastair D. Burt Newcastle University
John T Harvey
John T Harvey University of California, Davis
Ulrich Beuers
Ulrich Beuers University of Amsterdam
Andrew M. Blamire
Andrew M. Blamire Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways and online degrees can expand your opportunities within healthcare, complementing or providing alternatives to a traditional medical degree. Many students begin their healthcare journey with practical nursing through an lpn fast track program, allowing for quicker entry into clinical roles and valuable work experience.

For those interested in mental health, advanced nursing roles are increasingly in demand. Consider enrolling in one of the online psych np programs, which offer specialization with flexible, remote coursework.

Healthcare is not just about clinical practice—administration and management are crucial. An health administration degree online provides foundational business and leadership skills for those aiming to work in hospital or health system management. If you are looking to further your expertise, consider the cheapest master's in healthcare administration for advanced, affordable career development in the field.

Each of these options opens additional doors in the healthcare industry—helping you find the right fit for your passions and career goals, even before or alongside medical school.

Best Scientists Citing David Jones

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles