World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
51
Citations
10856
World Ranking
5491
National Ranking
235

Gilles Rode publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles Rode sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 228 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Gilles Rode D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gilles Rode sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gilles Rode is affiliated with the Hospices Civils de Lyon in France and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a particular focus on rehabilitation and medical education. Their research spans various subfields including general health professions, cognitive neuroscience, rehabilitation, public health, environmental and occupational health, and psychiatry and mental health.

The main topics covered in their work include:

  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
  • Healthcare professionals' stress and burnout
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Innovations in Medical Education
  • Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
  • Botulinum Toxin and Related Neurological Disorders

Frequent publication venues for their studies include:

  • Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • BMC Medical Education
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Medical Teacher
  • MedEdPublish

Among their recent papers are:

  • Chest CT for rapid triage of patients in multiple emergency departments during COVID-19 epidemic: experience report from a large French university hospital, 2020, European Radiology
  • Medical students attitudes toward and intention to work with the underserved: a systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, BMC Medical Education
  • Assessing the implementation of community-based learning in public health: a mixed methods approach, 2022, BMC Medical Education
  • Factors associated with post-stroke social participation: A quantitative study based on the ICF framework, 2022, Annals of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine
  • OSCEs for ranking medical students, 2022, Medical Teacher

The scientist collaborates frequently with several colleagues including Jacques Luauté, Marc Lilot, Sophie Schlatter, Antoine Duclos, and Yves Rossetti.

Best Publications

  • Prism adaptation to a rightward optical deviation rehabilitates left hemispatial neglect

    Yves Rossetti;Gilles Rode;Laure Pisella;Alessandro Farné

  • An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia.

    L. Pisella;H. Gréa;C. Tilikete;C. Tilikete;A. Vighetto;A. Vighetto

  • Sensitivity of clinical and behavioural tests of spatial neglect after right hemisphere stroke

    P Azouvi;C Samuel;A Louis-Dreyfus;T Bernati

  • Visuo-spatial neglect: a systematic review of current interventions and their effectiveness.

    Jacques Luauté;Peter Halligan;Gilles Rode;Yves Rossetti

  • Prism adaptation improves representational neglect.

    Gilles Rode;Yves Rossetti;Yves Rossetti;Dominique Boisson;Dominique Boisson

  • Dynamic Changes in Brain Activity during Prism Adaptation

    Jacques Luauté;Sophie Schwartz;Yves Rossetti;Mona Spiridon

  • Partial Remission of Hemiplegia and Somatoparaphrenia Through Vestibular Stimulation in a Case of Unilateral Neglect

    G. Rode;N. Charles;M.-T. Perenin;A. Vighetto

  • Right spatial neglect after left hemisphere stroke: qualitative and quantitative study.

    J.-M. Beis;C. Keller;N. Morin;P. Bartolomeo

  • Predominance of postural imbalance in left hemiparetic patients.

    G Rode;C Tiliket;D Boisson

  • Enhancing Visuomotor Adaptation by Reducing Error Signals: Single-step (Aware) versus Multiple-step (Unaware) Exposure to Wedge Prisms

    Carine Michel;Carine Michel;Laure Pisella;Claude Prablanc;Gilles Rode

  • White matter lesional predictors of chronic visual neglect: a longitudinal study

    Marine Lunven;Marine Lunven;Michel Thiebaut De Schotten;Michel Thiebaut De Schotten;Clémence Bourlon;Christophe Duret

  • Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation improves postural imbalance in left-hemiparetic patients

    Caroline Tilikete;Gilles Rode;Yves Rossetti;Jacques Pichon

  • Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders

    Laure Pisella;Gilles Rode;Alessandro Farnè;Caroline Tilikete

  • Dissociated long lasting improvements of straight-ahead pointing and line bisection tasks in two hemineglect patients.

    Laure Pisella;Gilles Rode;Alessandro Farnè;Dominique Boisson

  • Simulating unilateral neglect in normals using prism adaptation: implications for theory.

    Carine Michel;Laure Pisella;Peter W Halligan;Jacques Luauté

  • Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control

    Y Rossetti;P Revol;Robert McIntosh;L Pisella

  • Cognitive bias induced by visuo-motor adaptation to prisms: a simulation of unilateral neglect in normal individuals?

    C Colent;Laure Pisella;C Bernieri;Gilles Rode

  • Implicit processing of somaesthetic information: a dissociation between where and how?

    Yves Rossetti;Gilles Rode;Dominique Boisson

  • Functional anatomy of the therapeutic effects of prism adaptation on left neglect

    J. Luaute;C. Michel;G. Rode;L. Pisella

  • Rehabilitation of spatial neglect by prism adaptation: A peculiar expansion of sensorimotor after-effects to spatial cognition

    Sophie Jacquin-Courtois;Sophie Jacquin-Courtois;Jacinta O'Shea;Jacinta O'Shea;Jacques Luauté;Jacques Luauté;Laure Pisella;Laure Pisella

  • Semiology of neglect: An update.

    G. Rode;C. Pagliari;L. Huchon;Yves Rossetti

  • Bottom-up transfer of sensory-motor plasticity to recovery of spatial cognition: visuomotor adaptation and spatial neglect

    Gilles Rode;Gilles Rode;Laure Pisella;Yves Rossetti;Yves Rossetti;Alessandro Farnè

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Dominique Boisson
Dominique Boisson Hôpital Édouard-Herriot
Laure Pisella
Laure Pisella Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Christian Collet
Christian Collet Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Aymeric Guillot
Aymeric Guillot Claude Bernard University Lyon 1
Paolo Bartolomeo
Paolo Bartolomeo Allen Institute for Brain Science
Caroline Tilikete
Caroline Tilikete Hospices Civils de Lyon
Giuseppe Vallar
Giuseppe Vallar University of Milano-Bicocca
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten
Michel Thiebaut de Schotten University of Bordeaux

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Gilles Rode

Trending Scientists