World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 49 5713 5308 3100 2810 162 8856

Robert Lickliter publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert Lickliter between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert Lickliter published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 3.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1998. 4 of the 173 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1998. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 7 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 8 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 4 publications
1982 2025

173 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert Lickliter: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 3
1985 2
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 4
1991 2
1992 3
1993 3
1994 2
1995 4
1996 7
1997 2
1998 10
1999 1
2000 8
2001 3
2002 7
2003 6
2004 10
2005 3
2006 7
2007 7
2008 6
2009 6
2010 6
2011 2
2012 3
2013 6
2014 3
2015 3
2016 6
2017 6
2018 3
2019 3
2020 3
2021 3
2022 2
2023 5
2024 0
2025 4
Total 173
Download as CSV

Robert Lickliter publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Lickliter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 161–170 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 162 publications — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477 162
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert Lickliter D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert Lickliter sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487 49
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert Lickliter is a researcher affiliated with Florida International University in the United States. Their work spans several fields including cognitive neuroscience, social psychology, sociology and political science, animal science and zoology, as well as molecular biology. The scientist's research covers a variety of topics such as evolutionary game theory and cooperation, hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, animal nutrition and physiology, epigenetics and DNA methylation, birth, development, and health, nutrition, genetics, and disease, and child and animal learning development.

Lickliter has published in multiple venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Human Development
  • Developmental Psychobiology
  • American Psychologist
  • Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • Applied Animal Behaviour Science

Recent papers by Robert Lickliter include the following:

  • "Molecular and Systemic Epigenetic Inheritance: Integrating Development, Genetics, and Evolution," 2023, Human Development
  • "Evolving evolutionary psychology," 2021, American Psychologist
  • "Development as explanation: Understanding phenotypic stability and variability after the failure of genetic determinism," 2023, Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology
  • "Hearing better with the right eye? The lateralization of multisensory processing affects auditory learning in Northern bobwhite quail (Colinus Virginianus) chicks," 2021, Applied Animal Behaviour Science
  • "How deep do we have to go to rehabilitate evolutionary psychology? Reply to Bjorklund et al. (2022)," 2022, American Psychologist

Collaborations are an integral part of Lickliter's research activities. Frequent co-authors include:

  • David S. Moore
  • David C. Witherington
  • Lorraine E. Bahrick
  • Darcia Narváez
  • Timothy I Vandiver

Best Publications

  • Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy.

    Lorraine E. Bahrick;Robert Lickliter

  • The Significance of Biology for Human Development: A Developmental Psychobiological Systems View

    Gilbert Gottlieb;Douglas Wahlsten;Robert Lickliter

  • Developmental Dynamics: Toward a Biologically Plausible Evolutionary Psychology

    Robert Lickliter;Hunter Honeycutt

  • Intersensory Redundancy Guides the Development of Selective Attention, Perception, and Cognition in Infancy:

    Lorraine E. Bahrick;Robert Lickliter;Ross Flom

  • The Development of Intersensory Perception : Comparative Perspectives

    David J. Lewkowicz;Robert Lickliter

  • Intersensory redundancy guides early perceptual and cognitive development.

    Lorraine E Bahrick;Robert Lickliter

  • Intersensory redundancy facilitates discrimination of tempo in 3-month-old infants.

    Lorraine E. Bahrick;Ross Flom;Robert Lickliter

  • The role of intersensory redundancy in early perceptual, cognitive, and social development

    Lorraine E. Bahrick;Robert Lickliter

  • The development of infant intersensory perception: advantages of a comparative convergent-operations approach.

    Robert Lickliter;Lorraine E. Bahrick

  • The integrated development of sensory organization.

    Robert Lickliter

  • The phylogeny fallacy: Developmental psychology's misapplication of evolutionary theory

    Robert Lickliter;Thomas D Berry

  • Premature visual stimulation accelerates intersensory functioning in bobwhite quail neonates.

    Robert Lickliter

  • Social interaction with siblings is necessary for visual imprinting of species-specific maternal preferences in ducklings (Anas platyrhynchos).

    Robert E. Lickliter;Gilbert Gottlieb

  • Infants' perception of rhythm and tempo in unimodal and multimodal stimulation: a developmental test of the intersensory redundancy hypothesis.

    Lorraine E. Bahrick;Robert Lickliter

  • Contextual determinants of auditory learning in bobwhite quail embryos and hatchlings.

    Robert Lickliter;Timothy B. Hellewell

  • Atypical perinatal sensory stimulation and early perceptual development: insights from developmental psychobiology.

    Robert Lickliter

  • Behavior associated with parturition in the domestic goat

    Robert E. Lickliter

  • Intersensory experience and early perceptual development: Attenuated prenatal sensory stimulation affects postnatal auditory and visual responsiveness in bobwhite quail chicks (Colinus virginianus).

    Robert Lickliter;David J. Lewkowicz

  • Intersensory redundancy facilitates prenatal perceptual learning in bobwhite quail (Colinus virginianus) embryos.

    Robert Lickliter;Lorraine E. Bahrick;Hunter Honeycutt

  • Book review: a dynamic systems approach to the development of cognition and action by, esther thelen and linda b. smith, cambridge, ma: The mit press, 1994, hardbound, 376 pages, $50.00. isbn 0-262-70059-x

    David J. Lewkowicz;Robert Lickliter

Frequent Co-Authors

Lorraine E. Bahrick
Lorraine E. Bahrick Florida International University
David J. Lewkowicz
David J. Lewkowicz Northeastern University
Gilbert Gottlieb
Gilbert Gottlieb University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Erich Möstl
Erich Möstl University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
John Colombo
John Colombo University of Kansas

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a psychology degree opens the door to a range of rewarding online degrees and career pathways across the USA. Among the most popular is school counseling, which is a vital role in education settings. Requirements for becoming a school counselor vary by state, so careful research is essential.

For instance, candidates interested in becoming a school counselor in Georgia or how to become a school counselor in Hawaii will find that both states have their own licensure stipulations, coursework prerequisites, and practicum hours.

Similarly, becoming a school counselor in Idaho and becoming a school counselor in Illinois involves completing specific graduate programs, passing exams, and meeting supervised internship requirements.

Many universities now offer flexible online master’s degrees in counseling, psychology, or education, helping students meet state standards while balancing other commitments. Choosing the right online program and understanding state-specific pathways is crucial for future success in this impactful field.

Best Scientists Citing Robert Lickliter

Trending Scientists