World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Willis F. Overton

Willis F. Overton

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
8789
World Ranking
5046
National Ranking
2768

Willis F. Overton publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willis F. Overton sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 120 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Willis F. Overton D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Willis F. Overton sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1977 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

Willis F. Overton is affiliated with Temple University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study including Neuroscience, Psychology, and Mathematics, with focused subfields in Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, and Statistics and Probability.

The scientist's work addresses several main topics, notably:

  • Neuroscience, Education and Cognitive Function
  • Educational and Psychological Assessments
  • Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills

Overton has contributed to the academic dialogue through publications in venues such as Mind Brain and Education. One recent paper authored by Mary Helen Immordino-Yang featuring Overton discusses a commemorative topic titled "In Memoriam: Remembering Kurt W. Fischer" published in 2020.

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Mary Helen Immordino-Yang
  • David B. Daniel
  • Richard M. Lerner

In recognition of professional contributions, Overton was awarded the status of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA) in 1977.

Best Publications

  • Processes, Relations, and Relational‐Developmental‐Systems

    Willis F. Overton

  • Models of Development and Theories of Development

    Hayne W. Reese;Willis F. Overton

  • Developmental Psychology: Philosophy, Concepts, Methodology

    Willis F. Overton

  • A New Paradigm for Developmental Science: Relationism and Relational-Developmental Systems

    Willis F. Overton

  • Turn Left at the Church, Or Three Miles North A Study of Direction Giving and Sex Differences

    Shawn L. Ward;Nora Newcombe;Willis F. Overton

  • Reasoning, necessity, and logic: Developmental perspectives.

    Willis F. Overton

  • Exemplifying the Integrations of the Relational Developmental System: Synthesizing Theory, Research, and Application to Promote Positive Development and Social Justice

    Richard M. Lerner;Willis F. Overton

  • Life-span development: Concepts and issues.

    Willis F. Overton

  • The development of cognitive gender constancy and sex role preferences.

    Dale E. Marcus;Willis F. Overton

  • Reasoning about certainty and uncertainty in concrete, causal, and propositional contexts.

    James P. Byrnes;Willis F. Overton

  • The representation of imagined objects in action sequences: a developmental study.

    Willis F. Overton;Joseph P. Jackson

  • Personality as the basis for theoretical predilections.

    John A. Johnson;Christopher K. Germer;Jay S. Efran;Willis F. Overton

  • Form and Content in the Development of Deductive Reasoning.

    Willis F. Overton

  • Relationism and relational developmental systems: a paradigm for developmental science in the post-Cartesian era.

    Willis F Overton

  • The Role of Negative Priming in Preschoolers' Flexible Rule Use on the Dimensional Change Card Sort Task

    Ulrich Müller;Anthony Steven Dick;Katherine Gela;Willis F. Overton

  • Competence and procedures: Constraints on the development of logical reasoning.

    Willis F. Overton

  • On the Assumptive Base of the Nature-Nurture Controversy: Additive versus Interactive Conceptions

    W.F. Overton

  • World Views and Their Influence on Psychological Theory and Research: Kuhn-Lakatos-Laudan

    Willis F. Overton

  • The Relationship Between Social and Cognitive Development

    Willis F. Overton

  • Semantic Familiarity, Relevance, and the Development of Deductive Reasoning

    Shawn L. Ward;Willis F. Overton

  • Development Across the Life Span

    Willis F. Overton

Frequent Co-Authors

Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Ulrich Müller
Ulrich Müller University of Victoria
James P. Byrnes
James P. Byrnes Temple University
Anthony Steven Dick
Anthony Steven Dick Florida International University
Peter C. M. Molenaar
Peter C. M. Molenaar Pennsylvania State University
David M. Brodzinsky
David M. Brodzinsky Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Frank C. Keil
Frank C. Keil Yale University
Elliot Turiel
Elliot Turiel University of California, Berkeley
Gilbert Gottlieb
Gilbert Gottlieb University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Vicki Anderson
Vicki Anderson Murdoch Children's Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens doors to numerous rewarding career paths, especially in fields like substance abuse counseling. Online degree programs offer flexibility for students aiming to complete their studies while gaining practical experience. Choosing an online program accredited by recognized bodies is crucial for meeting job and state licensure requirements.

Each state and city sets its own educational and certification criteria for substance abuse counselors. For example, the substance abuse counselor requirements in Laredo differ from the substance abuse counselor requirements in Las Vegas. In how to become a substance abuse counselor in Lexington, prospective counselors must follow the specific steps required by Kentucky, while the Lincoln substance abuse counselors education requirements emphasize local regulations and coursework.

Whether choosing a traditional or online route, understanding these pathways helps students prepare for licensure, certification, and real-world practice in a high-impact field that changes lives.

Best Scientists Citing Willis F. Overton

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles