World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
37
Citations
5573
World Ranking
6810
National Ranking
31

Kuo-Fong Ma publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kuo-Fong Ma sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 145 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Kuo-Fong Ma D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kuo-Fong Ma sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Fellow of American Geophysical Union (AGU)

Overview

Kuo-Fong Ma is affiliated with National Central University in Taiwan. Their primary field of study is Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a strong focus on Geophysics. Ma's research intersects subfields such as Civil and Structural Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Ocean Engineering, and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology.

The researcher has contributed extensively to topics including earthquake and tectonic studies, seismic waves and analysis, seismology and earthquake studies, seismic performance and analysis, high-pressure geophysics and materials, earthquake detection and analysis, and seismic imaging and inversion techniques.

Ma's recent publications span from 2020 to 2024 and demonstrate a range of investigations in seismology and geophysics:

  • Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis at Regional and National Scales: State of the Art and Future Challenges, 2020, Reviews of Geophysics
  • Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Taiwan: TEM PSHA2020, 2020, Earthquake Spectra
  • Within- and Between-Event Variabilities of Strong-Velocity Pulses of Moderate Earthquakes within Dense Seismic Arrays, 2021, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
  • The Global DAS Month of February 2023, 2023, Seismological Research Letters
  • Broad-band strain amplification in an asymmetric fault zone observed from borehole optical fiber and core, 2024, Communications Earth & Environment

Their frequent coauthors include Chung-Han Chan, Yen-Yu Lin, Ming-Che Hsieh, Sebastian von Specht, and Jia-Cian Gao.

Kuo-Fong Ma's work has been published in well-known venues such as Seismological Research Letters, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, Geophysical Journal International, Journal of Asian Earth Sciences, and Reviews of Geophysics.

Among their recognitions, Ma was named a Fellow of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Slip zone and energetics of a large earthquake from the Taiwan Chelungpu-fault Drilling Project

    Kuo Fong Ma;Hidemi Tanaka;Sheng Rong Song;Chien Ying Wang

  • Spatial and Temporal Distribution of Slip for the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

    Kuo Fong Ma;Jim Mori;Shiann Jong Lee;S. B. Yu

  • The Chi‐Chi, Taiwan earthquake: Large surface displacements on an inland thrust fault

    Kuo Fong Ma;Chyi Tyi Lee;Yi Ben Tsai;Tzay Chyn Shin

  • Slip history and dynamic implications of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake

    Chen Ji;Donald V. Helmberger;David J. Wald;Kuo Fong Ma

  • Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis at Regional and National Scales: State of the Art and Future Challenges

    Matthew C. Gerstenberger;Warner Marzocchi;Trevor Allen;Marco Pagani

  • Response of seismicity to Coulomb stress triggers and shadows of the 1999 Mw=7.6 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake

    Kuo Fong Ma;Chung Han Chan;Ross S. Stein

  • Transition from oblique subduction to collision: Earthquakes in the southernmost Ryukyu arc-Taiwan region

    Honn Kao;Sern-su Jack Shen;Kuo-Fong Ma

  • Heat signature on the Chelungpu fault associated with the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan earthquake

    Yasuyuki Kano;Jim Mori;Ryo Fujio;Hisao Ito

  • Ionospheric GPS total electron content (TEC) disturbances triggered by the 26 December 2004 Indian Ocean tsunami

    Jann Yenq Liu;Yi Ben Tsai;Kuo Fong Ma;Yuh Ing Chen

  • Evidence for fault lubrication during the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, earthquake (Mw7.6)

    Kuo-Fong Ma;Emily E. Brodsky;Jim Mori;Chen Ji

  • Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Structure of the Crust and Uppermost Mantle beneath Taiwan

    Kuo-Fong Ma;Jeen-Hwa Wang;Dapeng Zhao

  • Spatial slip distribution of the September 20, 1999, Chi‐Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake (MW7.6) —Inverted from teleseismic data

    Kuo Fong Ma;Teh Ru Alex Song;Shiann Jong Lee;Hsiang I. Wu

  • Moment-tensor inversion for offshore earthquakes east of Taiwan and their implications to regional collision

    Honn Kao;Pei-Ru Jian;Kuo-Fong Ma;Bor-Shouh Huang

  • Rapid afterslip following the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan Earthquake

    Ya Ju Hsu;Ya Ju Hsu;Noa Bechor;Paul Segall;Shui Beih Yu

  • Source-Scaling relationship for M 4.6-8.9 earthquakes, specifically for earthquakes in the Collision Zone of Taiwan

    Yin Tung Yen;Kuo Fong Ma

  • High magnetic susceptibility of fault gouge within Taiwan Chelungpu fault: Nondestructive continuous measurements of physical and chemical properties in fault rocks recovered from Hole B, TCDP

    Tetsuro Hirono;Weiren Lin;En Chao Yeh;Wonn Soh

  • Stress orientations of Taiwan Chelungpu-Fault Drilling Project (TCDP) hole-A as observed from geophysical logs

    Hung Yu Wu;Kuo Fong Ma;Mark Zoback;Naomi Boness

  • In situ measurement of the hydraulic diffusivity of the active Chelungpu Fault, Taiwan

    M. L. Doan;M. L. Doan;E. E. Brodsky;Y. Kano;K. F. Ma

  • Frictional heat from faulting of the 1999 Chi‐Chi, Taiwan earthquake

    H. Tanaka;W. M. Chen;C. Y. Wang;K. F. Ma

  • Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Taiwan

    Yu Ju Wang;Yu Ju Wang;Chung Han Chan;Ya Ting Lee;Kuo Fong Ma

  • Slip distribution and tectonic implication of the 1999 Chi-Chi, Taiwan, Earthquake

    Chen Ji;Donald V. Helmberger;Teh Ru Alex Song;Kuo Fong Ma

Frequent Co-Authors

Hiroo Kanamori
Hiroo Kanamori California Institute of Technology
Jim Mori
Jim Mori Kyoto University
Sheng-Rong Song
Sheng-Rong Song National Taiwan University
Weiren Lin
Weiren Lin Kyoto University
Emily E. Brodsky
Emily E. Brodsky University of California, Santa Cruz
Yih-Min Wu
Yih-Min Wu National Taiwan University
Fabrice Cotton
Fabrice Cotton University of Potsdam
Bor-Shouh Huang
Bor-Shouh Huang Academia Sinica
Masataka Kinoshita
Masataka Kinoshita University of Tokyo
Kenji Satake
Kenji Satake University of Tokyo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing Earth Science often intersects with various academic disciplines and career paths. For professionals or students seeking flexible learning options, exploring the short Spanish degrees can complement Earth Science studies, especially for roles in international research or fieldwork where bilingual skills are valuable.

Veterans interested in broadening their expertise might find tailored opportunities through Spanish degree online for veterans, offering accessible pathways to enhance communication skills within scientific communities or government organizations.

Additionally, integrating creativity with science is possible by exploring master of fine arts online programs. This combination can benefit Earth Science professionals engaged in environmental visualization, science communication, or educational content development.

For those aiming to advance into leadership or administrative roles, pursuing the best online master degree in human resource management can equip graduates with essential skills for managing teams and projects within scientific organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Kuo-Fong Ma

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles