World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Caroline Tilikete

Caroline Tilikete

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
42
Citations
9093
World Ranking
7563
National Ranking
349

Caroline Tilikete publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Tilikete sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 139 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Caroline Tilikete D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Caroline Tilikete sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Caroline Tilikete is affiliated with the Hospices Civils de Lyon in France. Their research spans a broad scope within medicine and neuroscience, primarily focusing on neurology and related subfields such as pathology, forensic medicine, ophthalmology, oncology, and cellular and molecular neuroscience. The scientist has contributed extensively to research in these areas with a total of 93 publications in medicine and 24 in neuroscience.

Their work engages with several main topics, including:

  • Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders
  • Ophthalmology and Eye Disorders
  • Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
  • Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Genetic Neurodegenerative Diseases

Frequent publication venues for their research include:

  • Revue Neurologique
  • The Cerebellum
  • Journal of Neurology
  • Neurology Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • The Lancet Neurology

Their notable recent papers are:

  • Diagnosis and classification of optic neuritis, 2022, The Lancet Neurology
  • Cranial Nerve Disorders Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors, 2020, Neurology
  • Ocular Sarcoidosis, 2020, Seminars in Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • Update on Cerebellar Ataxia with Neuropathy and Bilateral Vestibular Areflexia Syndrome (CANVAS), 2020, The Cerebellum
  • Demographic, clinical, biomarker, and neuropathological correlates of posterior cortical atrophy: an international cohort study and individual participant data meta-analysis, 2024, The Lancet Neurology

Caroline Tilikete has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Romain Marignier
  • Romain Deschamps
  • Élisabeth Maillart
  • Xavier Ayrignac
  • de Sèze

Their research contributions encompass clinical investigations and data meta-analyses addressing neurological disorders, ocular diseases, and neuroimmunological conditions. The integration of clinical biomarkers and neuropathological findings highlights their interdisciplinary approach connecting neurology and ophthalmology within broader medical research contexts.

Best Publications

  • Consensus paper: roles of the cerebellum in motor control--the diversity of ideas on cerebellar involvement in movement.

    Mario Manto;James M. Bower;Adriana Bastos Conforto;José M. Delgado-García

  • An 'automatic pilot' for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia.

    L. Pisella;H. Gréa;C. Tilikete;C. Tilikete;A. Vighetto;A. Vighetto

  • Clinical spectrum and prognostic value of CNS MOG autoimmunity in adults: The MOGADOR study.

    Alvaro Cobo-Calvo;Anne Ruiz;Elisabeth Maillart;Bertrand Audoin

  • Penumbral imaging and functional outcome in patients with anterior circulation ischaemic stroke treated with endovascular thrombectomy versus medical therapy: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data

    Bruce C V Campbell;Charles B L M Majoie;Gregory W Albers;Bijoy K Menon

  • A lesion of the posterior parietal cortex disrupts on-line adjustments during aiming movements.

    Hélène Gréa;Laure Pisella;Yves Rossetti;Michel Desmurget

  • Imaging features and safety and efficacy of endovascular stroke treatment: a meta-analysis of individual patient-level data.

    Luis San Roman;Bijoy K. Menon;Jordi Blasco;Maria Hernandez-Perez

  • Consensus Paper: Revisiting the Symptoms and Signs of Cerebellar Syndrome

    Florian Bodranghien;Amy Bastian;Carlo Casali;Mark Hallett

  • Grasping the past. delay can improve visuomotor performance.

    A.D Milner;H.C Dijkerman;L Pisella;R.D McIntosh

  • Sensorimotor adaptation of saccadic eye movements

    D Pélisson;N Alahyane;M Panouillères;C Tilikete

  • Prism adaptation to rightward optical deviation improves postural imbalance in left-hemiparetic patients

    Caroline Tilikete;Gilles Rode;Yves Rossetti;Jacques Pichon

  • Prism adaptation in the rehabilitation of patients with visuo-spatial cognitive disorders

    Laure Pisella;Gilles Rode;Alessandro Farnè;Caroline Tilikete

  • Visually guided reaching: bilateral posterior parietal lesions cause a switch from fast visuomotor to slow cognitive control

    Y Rossetti;P Revol;Robert McIntosh;L Pisella

  • Predicting Visual Outcome After Treatment of Pituitary Adenomas With Optical Coherence Tomography

    Maud Jacob;Gérald Raverot;Gérald Raverot;Emmanuel Jouanneau;Emmanuel Jouanneau;Françoise Borson-Chazot;Françoise Borson-Chazot

  • Adult neuronal ceroid lipofuscinosis with palmitoyl-protein thioesterase deficiency: First adult-onset patients of a childhood disease

    Otto P. Van Diggelen;Stephane Thobois;Caroline Tilikete;Marie‐Thérèse Zabot

  • Preserved prism adaptation in bilateral optic ataxia: strategic versus adaptive reaction to prisms

    L. Pisella;C. Michel;H. Gréa;C. Tilikete

  • Hypertrophic Olivary Degeneration and Palatal or Oculopalatal Tremor.

    Caroline Tilikete;Virginie Desestret

  • Ipsidirectional impairment of prism adaptation after unilateral lesion of anterior cerebellum.

    L. Pisella;Y. Rossetti;C. Michel;G. Rode

  • [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of cancer in patients with paraneoplastic neurological syndrome and anti-Hu antibodies.

    J. C. Antoine;L. Cinotti;C. Tilikete;F. Bouhour

  • Persistent visual impairment in multiple sclerosis: prevalence, mechanisms and resulting disability

    Laurence Jasse;Sandra Vukusic;Françoise Durand-Dubief;Cristina Vartin

  • Ocular scanning and perceptual size distortion in hemispatial neglect: effects of prism adaptation and sequential stimulus presentation

    H. Chris Dijkerman;Robert D. McIntosh;Robert D. McIntosh;A. David Milner;Yves Rossetti

Frequent Co-Authors

Yves Rossetti
Yves Rossetti Lyon Neuroscience Research Center
Laure Pisella
Laure Pisella Inserm : Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale
Gilles Rode
Gilles Rode Hospices Civils de Lyon
Stéphane Thobois
Stéphane Thobois Hospices Civils de Lyon
Dominique Boisson
Dominique Boisson Hôpital Édouard-Herriot
Jérôme Honnorat
Jérôme Honnorat Hospices Civils de Lyon
Robert D. McIntosh
Robert D. McIntosh University of Edinburgh
Mathieu Anheim
Mathieu Anheim University of Strasbourg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Neuroscience opens up diverse career paths, especially in the fields of mental health, psychology, and counseling. If you're exploring further education to expand your expertise or gain specialized credentials, there are several affordable online programs in related disciplines.

For instance, professionals interested in becoming licensed counselors can consider the cheapest online counseling degree options, which offer accredited pathways to advance your qualifications. Those specifically aiming for roles in mental health services might look into the cheapest online masters in mental health counseling programs, which prepare graduates for various therapeutic careers.

If your interest lies in working with families or couples, the cheapest online mft programs focus on marriage and family therapy, merging neuroscience with practical counseling strategies. Additionally, pursuing a masters of psychology online can deepen your understanding of brain function and behavior, opening doors to research, education, and healthcare roles.

These affordable online degrees offer flexible, accessible ways for neuroscience graduates to broaden their career opportunities and make a real impact on mental health and well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Caroline Tilikete

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles