World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 44 7011 6538 63 56 205 7159

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 10.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2021. 25 of the 216 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2021. 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 15 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 19 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 14 publications
2005 2025

216 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 1
2006 4
2007 3
2008 2
2009 5
2010 4
2011 4
2012 4
2013 9
2014 16
2015 3
2016 12
2017 11
2018 15
2019 14
2020 27
2021 28
2022 10
2023 19
2024 11
2025 14
Total 216
Download as CSV

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 201–210 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 205 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328 205
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558 44
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and has contributed extensively to the fields of psychology and medicine, focusing particularly on clinical psychology and psychiatry. Their research encompasses a broad range of topics related to mental health, psychotherapy, and the psychological impacts of COVID-19.

The scientist's recent research output includes work on the psychological ramifications of the COVID-19 pandemic, with several papers examining mental health outcomes during this global crisis. Notable publications include:

  • Risk factors for psychological distress during the COVID-19 pandemic in Israel: Loneliness, age, gender, and health status play an important role (2020), British Journal of Health Psychology
  • Psychological Intervention and COVID-19: What We Know So Far and What We Can Do (2020), Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy
  • Anxiety and Depression Symptoms in COVID-19 Isolated Patients and in Their Relatives (2020), Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The association between witnessing patient death and mental health outcomes in frontline COVID-19 healthcare workers (2021), Depression and Anxiety
  • Trajectories of post-traumatic stress symptoms, anxiety, and depression in hospitalized COVID-19 patients: A one-month follow-up (2021), Journal of Psychosomatic Research

Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon frequently collaborates with several researchers, including Paul H. Lysaker, Libby Igra, David Roe, Adi Lavi-Rotenberg, and Nimrod Hertz-Palmor, reflecting a broad network of co-authorship in their research endeavors.

Their publications regularly appear in journals such as Frontiers in Psychiatry, Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice, Journal of Clinical Psychology, and Schizophrenia Research.

The main fields of study for this scientist are psychology and medicine, with a particular emphasis on clinical psychology and psychiatry. Their research covers several subfields and topics, including:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Psychiatry and Mental Health
  • Philosophy
  • Social Psychology
  • General Health Professions

  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Personality Disorders and Psychopathology

Best Publications

  • Conceptualizations, assessments, and implications of personal recovery in mental illness: A scoping review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses.

    Jaap van Weeghel;Catherine van Zelst;Dienke Boertien;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

  • Internalized stigma and quality of life among persons with severe mental illness: The mediating roles of self-esteem and hope

    Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Philip T. Yanos;Paul H. Lysaker;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Women with advanced breast cancer and their spouses: diversity of support and psychological distress.

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Gil Goldzweig;Michal Braun;Daliah Galinsky

  • Recovery and serious mental illness: a review of current clinical and research paradigms and future directions.

    Bethany L. Leonhardt;Kelsey Huling;Jay A. Hamm;David Roe

  • Insight into psychosis and quality of life

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Shlomo Kravetz;David Roe;Anthony S. David

  • A randomized controlled trial of the effectiveness of the illness management and recovery program.

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;David Roe;Shlomo Kravetz

  • Psychological Intervention and COVID-19: What We Know So Far and What We Can Do.

    Felix Inchausti;Angus MacBeth;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Giancarlo Dimaggio

  • Narrative enhancement and cognitive therapy (NECT) effectiveness: a quasi-experimental study.

    David Roe;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg;Oren Derhy

  • Metacognitive and social cognition approaches to understanding the impact of schizophrenia on social quality of life

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Moran Avidan-Msika;Michal Mashiach-Eizenberg;Shlomo Kravetz

  • Insight into severe mental illness, hope, and quality of life of persons with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorders.

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Shlomo Kravetz;Taly Meir;Silvio Rozencwaig

  • Metacognitive function and fragmentation in schizophrenia: Relationship to cognition, self-experience and developing treatments.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Kyle S. Minor;John T. Lysaker;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

  • The Special Challenges of Psychotherapy with Persons with Psychosis: Intersubjective Metacognitive Model of Agreement and Shared Meaning.

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Shlomo Kravetz;Paul H. Lysaker

  • Promoting recovery from severe mental illness: Implications from research on metacognition and metacognitive reflection and insight therapy

    Paul Henry Lysaker;Jay A Hamm;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Michelle L Pattison

  • Stereotype endorsement, metacognitive capacity, and self-esteem as predictors of stigma resistance in persons with schizophrenia.

    Lori M. Nabors;Phillip T. Yanos;David Roe;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

  • Meaning in life, insight and self-stigma among people with severe mental illness.

    Shir Ehrlich-Ben Or;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Daniel Feingold;Kobi Vahab

  • Nature adventure rehabilitation for combat-related posttraumatic chronic stress disorder: a randomized control trial.

    Marc Gelkopf;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Menashe Bikman;Shlomo Kravetz

  • Insight into mental illness, self-stigma, and the family burden of parents of persons with a severe mental illness

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Itamar Levy;Shlomo Kravetz;Adi Vollanski-Narkis

  • Depression and insight in schizophrenia: comparisons of levels of deficits in social cognition and metacognition and internalized stigma across three profiles.

    Paul H. Lysaker;Jen Vohs;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Marina Kukla;Marina Kukla

  • Talking About Life and Finding Solutions to Different Hardships A Qualitative Study on the Impact of Narrative Enhancement and Cognitive Therapy on Persons With Serious Mental Illness

    David Roe;Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Oren Derhi;Philip T. Yanos

  • Insight into mental illness and self-stigma: The mediating role of shame proneness

    Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon;Shir Ehrlich-Ben Or;Kobi Vahab;Revital Amiaz

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul H. Lysaker
Paul H. Lysaker Indiana University
David Roe
David Roe University of Haifa
Shlomo Kravetz
Shlomo Kravetz Bar-Ilan University
Doron Gothelf
Doron Gothelf Tel Aviv University
André Aleman
André Aleman University Medical Center Groningen
Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg
Gerdina H. M. Pijnenborg University of Groningen
Mark Weiser
Mark Weiser Sheba Medical Center
Philip T. Yanos
Philip T. Yanos City University of New York
Giancarlo Dimaggio
Giancarlo Dimaggio Centro di Terapia Metacognitiva Interpersonale - Rome
Kelly D. Buck
Kelly D. Buck Veterans Health Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology can open the door to a diverse range of online degrees and career options, from clinical roles to research and social services. Many students consider branching into related fields such as social work, which provides both hands-on experience and the chance to make a meaningful impact in communities.

One key consideration is affordability. There are several affordable social work degrees in Boston ideal for those looking to balance cost with quality education. In California, you’ll find some of the most affordable social work degree programs in California, offering flexible online options for psychology graduates seeking to specialize further.

For those based in the Midwest, there are also most affordable social work degree programs in Chicago available both on-campus and online, bridging psychology theory with practical skills. If you’re searching in Ohio, explore affordable social work degrees in Columbus as another potential pathway.

Choosing an online degree in a related field can expand your career opportunities and help you tailor your education to your personal goals and geographic preferences.

Best Scientists Citing Ilanit Hasson-Ohayon

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles