World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9538 8919 5049 4604 119 5286

Andrew L. Geers publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew L. Geers between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew L. Geers published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 13 publications in 2019. 20 of the 143 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 13. Peak 13 publications in 2019. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 2 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 3 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 1 publication 2008: 2 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 11 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 11 publications
1998 2025

143 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew L. Geers: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 2
2000 1
2001 3
2002 5
2003 2
2004 2
2005 5
2006 1
2007 1
2008 2
2009 6
2010 2
2011 5
2012 2
2013 7
2014 9
2015 7
2016 4
2017 4
2018 5
2019 13
2020 9
2021 11
2022 9
2023 5
2024 9
2025 11
Total 143
Download as CSV

Andrew L. Geers publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew L. Geers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 119 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 119
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew L. Geers D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew L. Geers sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Andrew L. Geers is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields of study, with a particular focus on neuroscience and medicine. Predominantly, their work relates to cognitive neuroscience and psychiatry and mental health, alongside contributions in clinical psychology, complementary and alternative medicine, and applied psychology.

The scientist's research topics include pain management and placebo effect, empathy and medical education, complementary and alternative medicine studies, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, behavioral health and interventions, psychosomatic disorders and their treatments, and neuroscience education and cognitive function.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • Annals of Behavioral Medicine
  • Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • BMC Psychology
  • Social and Personality Psychology Compass

Andrew L. Geers has collaborated often with several co-authors, such as Kelly S. Clemens, Kate Faasse, Ben Colagiuri, Luana Colloca, and Lene Vase.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Andrew L. Geers are:

  • Affect and emotions in placebo and nocebo effects: What do we know so far? (2020), published in Social and Personality Psychology Compass
  • Psychosocial Factors Predict COVID-19 Vaccine Side Effects (2021), published in Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics

Other notable recent publications relevant to the broader field include:

  • What Should Clinicians Tell Patients about Placebo and Nocebo Effects? Practical Considerations Based on Expert Consensus (2020), Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics
  • European Headache Federation recommendations for placebo and nocebo terminology (2020), The Journal of Headache and Pain
  • Determinants of safety-focused product purchasing in the United States at the beginning of the global COVID-19 pandemic (2020), Safety Science

Best Publications

  • Implications of Placebo and Nocebo Effects for Clinical Practice: Expert Consensus.

    Andrea W M Evers;Luana Colloca;Charlotte Blease;Marco Annoni

  • Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response.

    Andrew L. Geers;Suzanne G. Helfer;Kristin Kosbab;Paul E. Weiland

  • Goal activation, expectations, and the placebo effect.

    Andrew L. Geers;Paul E. Weiland;Kristin Kosbab;Sarah J. Landry

  • Dispositional optimism predicts placebo analgesia.

    Andrew L. Geers;Justin A. Wellman;Stephanie L. Fowler;Suzanne G. Helfer

  • Getting to know you: Face-to-face versus online interactions

    Bradley M. Okdie;Rosanna E. Guadagno;Frank J. Bernieri;Andrew L. Geers

  • Further evidence for individual differences in placebo responding: an interactionist perspective.

    Andrew L. Geers;Kristin Kosbab;Suzanne G. Helfer;Paul E. Weiland

  • Dispositional optimism and engagement: the moderating influence of goal prioritization.

    Andrew L. Geers;Justin A. Wellman;G. Daniel Lassiter

  • Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience.

    Andrew L. Geers;G.Daniel Lassiter

  • Expectations and Placebo Response: A Laboratory Investigation into the Role of Somatic Focus

    Andrew L. Geers;Suzanne G. Helfer;Paul E. Weiland;Kristin Kosbab

  • Videotaped interrogations and confessions: a simple change in camera perspective alters verdicts in simulated trials.

    G. Daniel Lassiter;Andrew L. Geers;Ian M. Handley;Paul E. Weiland

  • Illusory Causation: Why It Occurs

    G. Daniel Lassiter;Andrew L. Geers;Patrick J. Munhall;Robert J. Ploutz-Snyder

  • Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating

    Stephen D Christman;Bradley R Henning;Andrew L Geers;Ruth E Propper

  • Optimistic expectations in early marriage: a resource or vulnerability for adaptive relationship functioning?

    Lisa Ann Neff;Andrew L. Geers

  • Effects of Affective Expectations on Affective Experience: The Moderating Role of Optimism-Pessimism

    Andrew L. Geers;G. Daniel Lassiter

  • Why does choice enhance treatment effectiveness? Using placebo treatments to demonstrate the role of personal control.

    Andrew L. Geers;Jason P. Rose;Stephanie L. Fowler;Heather M. Rasinski

  • Dispositional optimism and thoughts of well-being determine sensitivity to an experimental pain task.

    Andrew L. Geers;Justin A. Wellman;Suzanne G. Helfer;Stephanie L. Fowler

  • Can Positive Framing Reduce Nocebo Side Effects? Current Evidence and Recommendation for Future Research.

    Kirsten Barnes;Kate Faasse;Andrew L. Geers;Suzanne G. Helfer

  • Discerning the role of optimism in persuasion: the valence-enhancement hypothesis.

    Andrew L Geers;Ian M Handley;Amber R McLarney

  • Affect and exercise: positive affective expectations can increase post-exercise mood and exercise intentions

    Suzanne G. Helfer;Jon D. Elhai;Andrew L. Geers

  • Videotaped confessions: Is guilt in the eye of the camera?

    G. Daniel Lassiter;Andrew L. Geers;Patrick J. Munhall;Ian M. Handley

  • Optimism, Pessimism, and Friendship

    Andrew L. Geers;Sean P. Reilley;William N. Dember

Frequent Co-Authors

Ben Colagiuri
Ben Colagiuri University of Sydney
Irving Kirsch
Irving Kirsch Harvard University
Joseph D. Hovey
Joseph D. Hovey The University of Texas at Austin
Fabrizio Benedetti
Fabrizio Benedetti University of Turin
Tor D. Wager
Tor D. Wager Dartmouth College
Jon D. Elhai
Jon D. Elhai University of Toledo
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Louise Sharpe
Louise Sharpe University of Sydney
Jens Gaab
Jens Gaab University of Basel
Matthew T. Tull
Matthew T. Tull University of Toledo

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens multiple versatile career pathways. For those interested in mental health services, online psychology programs can be the first step towards positions such as school counselor, substance abuse counselor, or mental health counselor. Each career pathway comes with its own specific requirements, and many roles require both a relevant degree and state licensure.

The process may vary depending on your state or city. You can find detailed steps for how to become a mental health counselor in Chicago as well as more regionally specific advice for those looking to become a mental health counselor in Chula Vista. It’s important to research the mental health counselor requirements in Cincinnati or wherever you plan to practice, since coursework, supervised experience, and exams may differ.

If you’re considering starting your journey, look into region-specific resources like how to become a mental health counselor in Cleveland for tailored advice. Online degrees in psychology offer flexibility for those balancing work, family, or other commitments, while also providing a gateway to rewarding mental health careers.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew L. Geers

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles