World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marcelo Q. Hoexter

Marcelo Q. Hoexter

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
41
Citations
6178
World Ranking
7896
National Ranking
66

Marcelo Q. Hoexter publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo Q. Hoexter sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 174 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Marcelo Q. Hoexter D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marcelo Q. Hoexter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marcelo Q. Hoexter is affiliated with the Universidade de São Paulo in Brazil. Their research spans several interconnected fields, including Psychology, Neuroscience, and Medicine. Within these areas, their work focuses primarily on Clinical Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Psychiatry and Mental Health, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, and Neurology.

The scientist's research topics primarily cover:

  • Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD)
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications

Marcelo Q. Hoexter has contributed to multiple recent papers, including the following:

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups (2020), published in American Journal of Psychiatry
  • Toward a neurocircuit-based taxonomy to guide treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (2021), published in Molecular Psychiatry
  • An overview of the first 5 years of the ENIGMA obsessive-compulsive disorder working group: The power of worldwide collaboration (2020), published in Human Brain Mapping
  • OUP accepted manuscript (2020), published in Brain
  • Structural neuroimaging biomarkers for obsessive-compulsive disorder in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium: medication matters (2020), published in Translational Psychiatry

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Marcelo C. Batistuzzo
  • Eurípedes Constantino Miguel
  • Roseli Gedanke Shavitt
  • Christine Löchner
  • Odile A. van den Heuvel

Marcelo Q. Hoexter's research has appeared repeatedly in several prominent publication venues, such as:

  • Molecular Psychiatry
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Biological Psychiatry
  • Translational Psychiatry
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • Distinct Subcortical Volume Alterations in Pediatric and Adult OCD: A Worldwide Meta- and Mega-Analysis.

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Stephanie H. Ameis

  • Multicenter Voxel-Based Morphometry Mega-Analysis of Structural Brain Scans in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder

    Stella J. De Wit;Pino Alonso;Lizanne Schweren;David Mataix-Cols

  • Cortical Abnormalities Associated With Pediatric and Adult Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group

    Premika S.W. Boedhoe;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • Toward a neurocircuit-based taxonomy to guide treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Elizabeth Shephard;Elizabeth Shephard;Emily R Stern;Odile A van den Heuvel;Daniel L C Costa

  • Subcortical Brain Volume, Regional Cortical Thickness, and Cortical Surface Area Across Disorders: Findings From the ENIGMA ADHD, ASD, and OCD Working Groups

    Premika S W Boedhoe;Daan van Rooij;Martine Hoogman;Jos W R Twisk

  • Gamma ventral capsulotomy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a randomized clinical trial.

    Antonio C. Lopes;Benjamin D. Greenberg;Miguel M. Canteras;Marcelo C. Batistuzzo

  • Gray Matter Volumes in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Before and After Fluoxetine or Cognitive-Behavior Therapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter;Fábio Luis de Souza Duran;Carina Chaubet D'Alcante;Darin Dean Dougherty

  • Cortical thickness in obsessive–compulsive disorder: multisite mega-analysis of 780 brain scans from six centres

    Jean Paul Fouche;Stefan Du Plessis;Coenie Hattingh;Annerine Roos

  • Neuropsychological predictors of response to randomized treatment in obsessive-compulsive disorder

    Carina C. D'Alcante;Juliana B. Diniz;Victor Fossaluza;Marcelo C. Batistuzzo

  • Abnormal brain connectivity patterns in adults with ADHD: a coherence study.

    João Ricardo Sato;João Ricardo Sato;Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter;Xavier Francisco Castellanos;Luis Augusto Paim Rohde

  • Evolution of gamma knife capsulotomy for intractable obsessive-compulsive disorder.

    Euripedes C. Miguel;Antonio C. Lopes;Nicole C. R. McLaughlin;Georg Norén

  • Mapping Cortical and Subcortical Asymmetry in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Findings From the ENIGMA Consortium

    Xiang-Zhen Kong;Premika S W Boedhoe;Yoshinari Abe;Pino Alonso

  • An Empirical Comparison of Meta- and Mega-Analysis With Data From the ENIGMA Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Working Group

    Premika S. W. Boedhoe;Martijn W. Heymans;Lianne Schmaal;Yoshinari Abe

  • Age effects on the default mode and control networks in typically developing children.

    João Ricardo Sato;João Ricardo Sato;João Ricardo Sato;Giovanni Abrahão Salum;Giovanni Abrahão Salum;Ary Gadelha;Ary Gadelha;Felipe Almeida Picon;Felipe Almeida Picon

  • Structural neuroimaging biomarkers for obsessive-compulsive disorder in the ENIGMA-OCD consortium: medication matters

    Willem B Bruin;Luke Taylor;Rajat M Thomas;Jonathan P Shock

  • What is the optimal way to subdivide obsessive-compulsive disorder?

    Maria Alice de Mathis;Juliana Belo Diniz;Maria Conceição do Rosário;Albina R Torres

  • Phenomenology of OCD: lessons from a large multicenter study and implications for ICD-11.

    Roseli G. Shavitt;Maria Alice de Mathis;Fabio Oki;Ygor A. Ferrao

  • Evaluation of pattern recognition and feature extraction methods in ADHD prediction

    João Ricardo Sato;Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter;André Fujita;Luis Augusto Rohde

  • Parkinson's disease and dopamine transporter neuroimaging: a critical review.

    Ming Chi Shih;Ming Chi Shih;Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter;Marcelo Queiroz Hoexter;Luiz Augusto Franco de Andrade;Luiz Augusto Franco de Andrade;Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan;Rodrigo Affonseca Bressan

  • An overview of the first 5 years of the ENIGMA obsessive–compulsive disorder working group: The power of worldwide collaboration

    Odile A van den Heuvel;Odile A van den Heuvel;Premika S W Boedhoe;Sara Bertolin;Willem B Bruin

  • Treatment of resistant obsessive-compulsive disorder with ventral capsular/ventral striatal gamma capsulotomy: a pilot prospective study.

    Antonio Carlos Lopes;Benjamin D. Greenberg;Georg Noren;Miguel Montes Canteras

  • Brain structural covariance networks in obsessive-compulsive disorder: a graph analysis from the ENIGMA Consortium.

    Je-Yeon Yun;Je-Yeon Yun;Premika S W Boedhoe;Chris Vriend;Neda Jahanshad

Frequent Co-Authors

Euripedes Constantino Miguel
Euripedes Constantino Miguel Universidade de São Paulo
João Ricardo Sato
João Ricardo Sato Universidade Federal do ABC
Carles Soriano-Mas
Carles Soriano-Mas University of Barcelona
Giovanni Abrahão Salum
Giovanni Abrahão Salum Child Mind Institute
Luis Augusto Rohde
Luis Augusto Rohde Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
José M. Menchón
José M. Menchón University of Barcelona
Jun Soo Kwon
Jun Soo Kwon Seoul National University
María del Pino Alonso Ortega
María del Pino Alonso Ortega Bellvitge University Hospital
Juliana Belo Diniz
Juliana Belo Diniz Universidade de São Paulo
Damiaan Denys
Damiaan Denys University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Neuroscience is a dynamic field, intersecting with health, technology, and research. Pursuing a neuroscience degree can open doors to some of the most lucrative college degrees and advanced career prospects in medicine, pharmaceuticals, data science, and biotechnology.

Many students explore flexible learning options, including online degrees. If affordability is a top concern, choosing an online school that accepts fafsa can help reduce tuition costs and make higher education more accessible.

For those interested in boosting their credentials or pivoting their careers, consider certificates i can get online. These programs can offer specialized knowledge and often lead to high-paying roles without the commitment of a full degree.

If you’re seeking flexibility or entry points into related fields, you may also explore the easiest degree to get online. These programs enable quicker entry into the workforce or serve as stepping stones toward advanced neuroscience education.

Best Scientists Citing Marcelo Q. Hoexter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles