World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
49
Citations
16620
World Ranking
4207
National Ranking
1203

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Statistics
  • Regression analysis
  • Mechanical engineering

Jon C. Helton mostly deals with Uncertainty analysis, Uncertainty quantification, Sensitivity analysis, Statistics and Latin hypercube sampling. His research in Uncertainty analysis intersects with topics in Sampling, Regression analysis, Artificial intelligence and Sensitivity. His Sampling research incorporates themes from Variance decomposition of forecast errors, Sobol sequence, Stratified sampling and Space.

He focuses mostly in the field of Sensitivity, narrowing it down to topics relating to Data mining and, in certain cases, Distribution and Ranking. Jon C. Helton has included themes like Representation, Probability theory, Econometrics and Management science in his Uncertainty quantification study. His study looks at the relationship between Latin hypercube sampling and topics such as Stability, which overlap with Sample size determination, Hypercube, Kruskal–Wallis one-way analysis of variance, Statistic and Type I and type II errors.

His most cited work include:

  • Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems (1424 citations)
  • Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis (886 citations)
  • Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal (573 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Radioactive waste, Uncertainty quantification, Uncertainty analysis, Waste Isolation Pilot Plant and Waste management are his primary areas of study. Jon C. Helton interconnects Waste disposal and Civil engineering in the investigation of issues within Radioactive waste. His study looks at the relationship between Uncertainty quantification and fields such as Representation, as well as how they intersect with chemical problems.

Jon C. Helton has researched Uncertainty analysis in several fields, including Latin hypercube sampling, Mathematical optimization and Operations research. His work carried out in the field of Latin hypercube sampling brings together such families of science as Sampling, Probabilistic risk assessment, Theoretical computer science and Sensitivity. The various areas that he examines in his Waste Isolation Pilot Plant study include Environmental engineering, Transuranic waste and Drilling.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Radioactive waste (30.68%)
  • Uncertainty quantification (27.27%)
  • Uncertainty analysis (27.27%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?

  • High-level waste (12.50%)
  • Uncertainty quantification (27.27%)
  • Uncertainty analysis (27.27%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Jon C. Helton focuses on High-level waste, Uncertainty quantification, Uncertainty analysis, Radioactive waste and Reliability engineering. Jon C. Helton combines subjects such as Latin hypercube sampling and Sensitivity with his study of Uncertainty quantification. His Latin hypercube sampling study frequently links to related topics such as Operations research.

The concepts of his Sensitivity study are interwoven with issues in Sampling and Statistics. By researching both Uncertainty analysis and Metamodeling, Jon C. Helton produces research that crosses academic boundaries. His studies in Radioactive waste integrate themes in fields like System safety and Spent nuclear fuel.

Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in performance assessment for the proposed high-level radioactive waste repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada (29 citations)
  • Use of replicated Latin hypercube sampling to estimate sampling variance in uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results for the geologic disposal of radioactive waste (29 citations)
  • Analysis of computationally demanding models with continuous and categorical inputs (27 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Statistics
  • Mathematical analysis
  • Mechanical engineering

His scientific interests lie mostly in Uncertainty analysis, High-level waste, Radioactive waste, Uncertainty quantification and Civil engineering. His Uncertainty analysis research includes elements of Reliability engineering, Machine learning, Categorical variable, Surrogate model and Computational model. His studies link System safety with Radioactive waste.

His work deals with themes such as Latin hypercube sampling and Sensitivity, which intersect with Uncertainty quantification. His research on Latin hypercube sampling concerns the broader Statistics. The Sensitivity study combines topics in areas such as Econometrics, Sample size determination and Visual inspection.

Best Publications

  • Latin hypercube sampling and the propagation of uncertainty in analyses of complex systems

    Jon C. Helton;F. J. Davis

  • Survey of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis

    Jon C. Helton;Jay D. Johnson;Cédric J. Sallaberry;Curtis B. Storlie

  • Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal

    Jon C Helton

  • An Investigation of Uncertainty and Sensitivity Analysis Techniques for Computer Models

    Ronald L. Iman;Jon C. Helton

  • Challenge problems: uncertainty in system response given uncertain parameters

    William L. Oberkampf;Jon C. Helton;Cliff A. Joslyn;Steven F. Wojtkiewicz

  • An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions

    Jon C. Helton;Jay D. Johnson;William Oberkampf

  • Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis in the presence of stochastic and subjective uncertainty

    J.C. Helton

  • Treatment of Uncertainty in Performance Assessments for Complex Systems

    Jon C. Helton

  • Illustration of sampling-based methods for uncertainty and sensitivity analysis.

    J. C. Helton;F. J. Davis

  • Alternative representations of epistemic uncertainty

    Jon C. Helton;William Oberkampf

  • Implementation and evaluation of nonparametric regression procedures for sensitivity analysis of computationally demanding models

    Curtis B. Storlie;Laura Painton Swiler;Jon C. Helton;Cédric J. Sallaberry

  • A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis results obtained with random and Latin hypercube sampling

    Jon C. Helton;F. J. Davis;Jay D. Johnson

  • Mathematical representation of uncertainty

    William Oberkampf;Jon Helton;Kari Sentz

  • Guest editorial: treatment of aleatory and epistemic uncertainty in performance assessments for complex systems

    Jon C. Helton;David E. Burmaster

  • An Approach to Sensitivity Analysis of Computer Models: Part II - Ranking of Input Variables, Response Surface Validation, Distribution Effect and Technique Synopsis

    Ronald L. Iman;Jon C. Helton;James E. Campbell

  • Summary from the epistemic uncertainty workshop: consensus amid diversity

    Scott Ferson;Cliff A. Joslyn;Jon C. Helton;William L. Oberkampf

  • Multiple predictor smoothing methods for sensitivity analysis: Description of techniques

    Curtis B. Storlie;Jon C. Helton

  • A sampling-based computational strategy for the representation of epistemic uncertainty in model predictions with evidence theory

    J.C. Helton;J.D. Johnson;W.L. Oberkampf;C.B. Storlie

  • Representation of analysis results involving aleatory and epistemic uncertainty

    Jon C. Helton;Jay D. Johnson;William L. Oberkampf;Cédric J. Sallaberry

  • Statistical Analyses of Scatterplots to Identify Important Factors in Large-Scale Simulations, 1: Review and Comparison of Techniques

    J.P.C. Kleijnen;J.C. Helton

  • An exploration of alternative approaches to the representation of uncertainty in model predictions.

    Jay Dean Johnson;William Louis Oberkampf;Jon Craig Helton

Frequent Co-Authors

William L. Oberkampf
William L. Oberkampf Sandia National Laboratories
Jack P. C. Kleijnen
Jack P. C. Kleijnen Tilburg University
Sam S. Yoon
Sam S. Yoon Korea University
Andrea Saltelli
Andrea Saltelli UPF Barcelona School of Management
Brian J. Reich
Brian J. Reich North Carolina State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jon C. Helton

Trending Scientists