World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephen D. Christman

Stephen D. Christman

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
35
Citations
4700
World Ranking
9915
National Ranking
5232

Neuroscience

D-Index
35
Citations
4700
World Ranking
9207
National Ranking
3888

Stephen D. Christman publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Christman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 118 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Stephen D. Christman D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen D. Christman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stephen D. Christman is affiliated with the University of Toledo in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of neuroscience and psychology, with a particular focus on cognitive neuroscience. The subfields of their work also encompass sociology and political science, social psychology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's research interests are reflected in several key topics including hemispheric asymmetry in neuroscience, social and intergroup psychology, action observation and synchronization, animal behavior and reproduction, evolutionary psychology and human behavior, psychology of moral and emotional judgment, and misinformation and its impacts.

Stephen D. Christman has published extensively in academic venues such as Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition and Perceptual and Motor Skills. Other publication venues include Frontiers in Psychology, Rorschachiana Journal of the International Society for the Rorschach, and Personality and Individual Differences.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Authoritarianism, Conspiracy Beliefs, Gender and COVID-19: Links Between Individual Differences and Concern About COVID-19, Mask Wearing Behaviors, and the Tendency to Blame China for the Virus (2020, Frontiers in Psychology)
  • Predicting interactions in handedness research: The role of integrated versus independent dual-processes (2021, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition)
  • The Pen Is Not Always Mightier: Different Ways of Measuring Handedness With the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory Yield Different Handedness Conclusions (2020, Perceptual and Motor Skills)
  • Differences Between Consistent and Inconsistent Handedness Remain Consistently Interesting: Ten Years of Research on the Consistency of Handedness With the Edinburgh Handedness Inventory (2023, Perceptual and Motor Skills)
  • Handedness and the 2016 U.S. Primaries: consistent handedness predicts support for Donald Trump among republicans, but gender predicts support for Hillary Clinton among democrats (2020, Laterality Asymmetries of Body Brain and Cognition)

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Eric C. Prichard
  • Evan M. Clarkson
  • John D. Jasper
  • Evan Clarkson
  • Jeanette Walters

Best Publications

  • Bilateral eye movements enhance the retrieval of episodic memories.

    Stephen D. Christman;Kilian J. Garvey;Ruth E. Propper;Keri A. Phaneuf

  • Degree of Handedness, but not Direction, is a Systematic Predictor of Cognitive Performance

    Eric Prichard;Ruth E Propper;Stephen D Christman

  • Hemispheric differences are found in the identification, but not the detection, of low versus high spatial frequencies.

    Frederick L. Kitterle;Stephen Christman;Joseph B. Hellige

  • A mixed-handed advantage in episodic memory: a possible role of interhemispheric interaction.

    Ruth E. Propper;Stephen D. Christman;Keri Ann Phaneuf

  • Increased Interhemispheric Interaction Is Associated with Decreased False Memories in a Verbal Converging Semantic Associates Paradigm.

    Stephen D. Christman;Ruth E. Propper;Adam Dion

  • Cerebral asymmetries in sensory and perceptual processing

    Stephen Christman

  • Hemispheric asymmetry in the processing of absolute versus relative spatial frequency.

    Stephen Christman;Frederick L. Kitterle;Joseph Hellige

  • Equivalent perceptual asymmetries for free viewing of positive and negative emotional expressions in chimeric faces

    Stephen D. Christman;Michelle D. Hackworth

  • Increased interhemispheric interaction is associated with earlier offset of childhood amnesia.

    Stephen D. Christman;Ruth E. Propper;Tiffany J. Brown

  • Superior episodic memory is associated with interhemispheric processing.

    Stephen D. Christman;Ruth E. Propper

  • Individual differences in stroop and local-global processing: a possible role of interhemispheric interaction.

    Stephen D. Christman

  • Handedness in Musicians: Bimanual Constraints on Performance

    S. Christman

  • Visual hemispheric asymmetries depend on which spatial frequencies are task relevant

    Frederick L Kitterle;Joseph B Hellige;Stephen Christman

  • Mixed-handed persons are more easily persuaded and are more gullible: Interhemispheric interaction and belief updating

    Stephen D Christman;Bradley R Henning;Andrew L Geers;Ruth E Propper

  • Is Television Traumatic?: Dreams, Stress, and Media Exposure in the Aftermath of September 11, 2001:

    Ruth E. Propper;Robert Stickgold;Raeann Keeley;Stephen D. Christman

  • Effect of bilateral eye movements on frontal interhemispheric gamma EEG coherence: implications for EMDR therapy.

    Ruth E. Propper;Jenna Pierce;Mark W. Geisler;Stephen D. Christman

  • Mixed- versus strong right-handedness is associated with biases towards "remember" versus "know" judgements in recognition memory: role of interhemispheric interaction.

    Ruth E Propper;Stephen D Christman

  • Perceptual characteristics in visual laterality research

    Unknown

  • Individual differences in risk perception versus risk taking: Handedness and interhemispheric interaction

    Stephen D. Christman;John D. Jasper;Varalakshmi Sontam;Bruce Cooil

  • Interhemispheric interaction and beliefs on our origin: degree of handedness predicts beliefs in creationism versus evolution.

    Christopher Lee Niebauer;Stephen D Christman;Scott A Reid;Kilian J Garvey

  • Authoritarianism, Conspiracy Beliefs, Gender and COVID-19: Links Between Individual Differences and Concern About COVID-19, Mask Wearing Behaviors, and the Tendency to Blame China for the Virus

    Eric C. Prichard;Stephen D. Christman

  • Is Television Traumatic? Dreams, Stress, and Media Exposure in the Aftermath of

    Ruth E. Propper;Robert Stickgold;Raeann Keeley;Stephen D. Christman

Frequent Co-Authors

Tad T. Brunyé
Tad T. Brunyé Tufts University
Robert Stickgold
Robert Stickgold Harvard Medical School
Andrew L. Geers
Andrew L. Geers University of Toledo
Patricia J. Brooks
Patricia J. Brooks College of Staten Island
Joseph B. Hellige
Joseph B. Hellige Loyola Marymount University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in neuroscience opens the door to many related online degrees and career opportunities in mental health, therapy, and social care. For cost-conscious students wanting a solid foundation, pursuing a psychology degree cost can be both affordable and flexible, making it a popular starting point.

If your interests lean toward counseling or social support, exploring online master's in social work programs can prepare you for impactful roles in community services or clinical environments. Those aspiring to advanced clinical practice or leadership in mental health may consider top online psy d programs, which emphasize hands-on, practitioner-focused education.

Another rewarding pathway is licensure in marriage and family therapy. There are options for accelerated study, such as lmft programs, which allow graduates to serve individuals, couples, and families facing emotional challenges.

Whether you choose psychology, social work, or therapy, these online degrees offer versatile career prospects for those passionate about brain science and mental well-being.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen D. Christman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles