World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
48
Citations
10591
World Ranking
5895
National Ranking
3200

Patricia J. Brooks publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Brooks sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 154 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Patricia J. Brooks D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patricia J. Brooks sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patricia J. Brooks is affiliated with the College of Staten Island in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within the social sciences, with a primary focus on developmental and educational psychology. The subfields they contribute to include education, sociology and political science, artificial intelligence, and language and linguistics.

Their recent publications cover themes related to education, cognition, and media literacy. Notable papers include "Improving college students' fact-checking strategies through lateral reading instruction in a general education civics course" (2021, Cognitive Research Principles and Implications), "Executive Functions and Decoding in Children and Adolescents: a Meta-analytic Investigation" (2020, Educational Psychology Review), and "Associations Between Online Instruction in Lateral Reading Strategies and Fact-Checking COVID-19 News Among College Students" (2021, AERA Open). Other works explore neurodevelopmental topics and media literacy, such as "Slower Processing Speed in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-analytic Investigation of Time-Based Tasks" (2022, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders) and "Assessing and fostering college students' algorithm awareness across online contexts" (2020, Journal of Media Literacy Education).

The main topics addressed across their body of work include:

  • Language Development and Disorders
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Child Development and Digital Technology
  • Reading and Literacy Development
  • Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
  • Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism
  • EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning

Patricia J. Brooks frequently collaborates with coauthors such as Jessica E. Brodsky, Arshia K. Lodhi, S. Elizabeth, Teresa Ober, and C. Donnan Gravelle.

Their work has appeared repeatedly in venues including:

  • Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in Psychology
  • Arabixiv (OSF Preprints)
  • AERA Open
  • Journal of Media Literacy Education
  • Frontiers in Education

Overall, the research undertaken by Patricia J. Brooks integrates developmental, educational, and social psychological perspectives, often addressing learning strategies, literacy, and the impacts of misinformation within educational contexts. The intersection with artificial intelligence and media literacy illustrates an engagement with contemporary challenges related to digital technologies and information environments.

Best Publications

  • Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning?.

    Louis Alfieri;Patricia J. Brooks;Naomi J. Aldrich;Harriet R. Tenenbaum

  • Changing College Students' Conceptions of Autism: An Online Training to Increase Knowledge and Decrease Stigma.

    Kristen Gillespie-Lynch;Patricia J. Brooks;Fumio Someki;Rita Obeid

  • Whose Expertise Is It? Evidence for Autistic Adults as Critical Autism Experts.

    Kristen Gillespie-Lynch;Steven K. Kapp;Patricia J. Brooks;Jonathan Pickens

  • Use of computer-assisted technologies (CAT) to enhance social, communicative, and language development in children with autism spectrum disorders.

    Bertram O. Ploog;Alexa Scharf;DeShawn Nelson;Patricia J. Brooks

  • Effects of video-game play on information processing: a meta-analytic investigation.

    Kasey L. Powers;Patricia J. Brooks;Naomi J. Aldrich;Melissa A. Palladino

  • How Children Constrain Their Argument Structure Constructions.

    Patricia J. Brooks;Michael Tomasello

  • Early syntactic development: A Construction Grammar approach.

    Michael Tomasello;Patricia J. Brooks

  • Young Children Learn To Produce Passives with Nonce Verbs.

    Patricia J. Brooks;Michael Tomasello

  • Verb argument structure and the problem of avoiding an overgeneral grammar.

    Martin D. S. Braine;Patricia J. Brooks

  • Young children's overgeneralizations with fixed transitivity verbs.

    Patricia J. Brooks;Michael Tomasello;Kelly Dodson;Lawrence B. Lewis

  • A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Knowledge and Stigma Associated with Autism Spectrum Disorder Among College Students in Lebanon and the United States.

    Rita Obeid;Nidal Daou;Danielle DeNigris;Christina Shane-Simpson

  • Young children's earliest transitive and intransitive constructions.

    Michael Tomasello;Patricia J. Brooks

  • Inference and Action in Early Causal Reasoning.

    Douglas Frye;Philip David Zelazo;Patricia J. Brooks;Patricia J. Brooks;Mark C. Samuels

  • Acquisition of Gender-like Noun Subclasses in an Artificial Language: The Contribution of Phonological Markers to Learning

    Patricia J. Brooks;Martin D.S. Braine;Lisa Catalano;Ruth E. Brody

  • Shortcuts to Quantifier Interpretation in Children and Adults

    Patricia J. Brooks;Irina Sekerina

  • What do children know about the universal quantifiers all and each

    Patricia J. Brooks;Martin D.S. Braine

  • "For a Long Time Our Voices have been Hushed": Using Student Perspectives to Develop Supports for Neurodiverse College Students.

    Kristen Gillespie-Lynch;Dennis Bublitz;Annemarie Donachie;Vincent Wong

  • Exploring language acquisition in children with a miniature artificial language: Effects of item and pattern frequency, arbitrary subclasses, and correction

    Martin D.S Braine;Ruth E Brody;Patricia J Brooks;Vicki Sudhalter

  • Statistical Learning in Specific Language Impairment and Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.

    Rita Obeid;Patricia J. Brooks;Kasey L. Powers;Kristen Gillespie-Lynch

  • Is there a bilingual advantage on interference-control tasks? A multiverse meta-analysis of global reaction time and interference cost.

    Seamus Donnelly;Seamus Donnelly;Patricia J. Brooks;Patricia J. Brooks;Bruce D. Homer

  • The role of selective attention in preschoolers’ rule use in a novel dimensional card sort

    Patricia J Brooks;Julie B Hanauer;Barbara Padowska;Heidy Rosman

  • Phonological Priming in Children's Picture Naming.

    Patricia J. Brooks;Brian MacWhinney

  • Factors affecting young children's use of pronouns as referring expressions.

    Aimee L. Campbell;Patricia Brooks;Michael Tomasello

Frequent Co-Authors

Kristen Gillespie-Lynch
Kristen Gillespie-Lynch The Graduate Center, CUNY
Michael Tomasello
Michael Tomasello Duke University
Bruce D. Homer
Bruce D. Homer City University of New York
Jan L. Plass
Jan L. Plass New York University
Brian MacWhinney
Brian MacWhinney Carnegie Mellon University
Sandra L. Calvert
Sandra L. Calvert Georgetown University
C. Shawn Green
C. Shawn Green University of Wisconsin–Madison
Laura A. Rabin
Laura A. Rabin City University of New York
Nelson Cowan
Nelson Cowan University of Missouri
Jarrad A. G. Lum
Jarrad A. G. Lum Deakin University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Online psychology degrees open doors to a variety of career pathways, from counseling and research to human resources and social services. When selecting a program, students should consider both affordability and popularity, as these factors can impact accessibility and networking opportunities within the field.

For budget-conscious learners, there are several affordable psychology degrees in University Park and affordable psychology degrees in Utah, offering high-quality instruction without the heavy financial burden. Students in the Northeast can also explore the cheapest psychology programs in Vermont for cost-effective options.

Additionally, choosing a degree from institutions that offer popular psychology degrees in Charlotte can help graduates tap into robust alumni networks and promising local job markets. Ultimately, online psychology programs provide flexibility while preparing students for meaningful and diverse careers in mental health, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Patricia J. Brooks

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles