World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Computer Science
Sweden
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
88
Citations
52112
World Ranking
661
National Ranking
1

Ricardo Baeza-Yates publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Baeza-Yates sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 601 publications — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ricardo Baeza-Yates D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ricardo Baeza-Yates sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Sweden Leader Award
  • 2011 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the development of computer science
  • 2009 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the development of algorithms and information retrieval techniques.

Overview

Ricardo Baeza-Yates is affiliated with Northeastern University in the United States. Their research spans primarily across the fields of Computer Science and Social Sciences, with a substantial focus on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Communication. Other significant subfields include Safety Research and Sociology and Political Science.

Their scholarly output includes extensive work on key topics such as:

  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Mental Health via Writing
  • Topic Modeling
  • Complex Network Analysis Techniques
  • Wikis in Education and Collaboration
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Web Data Mining and Analysis

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Baeza-Yates demonstrate a multidisciplinary approach, featuring:

  • Detection of Suicidal Ideation on Social Media: Multimodal, Relational, and Behavioral Analysis, 2020, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Predicting Risk of Dyslexia with an Online Gamified Test, 2020, PLoS ONE
  • Fair Top-k Ranking with Multiple Protected Groups, 2021, Information Processing & Management
  • How Are AI Assistants Changing Higher Education?, 2023, Frontiers in Computer Science
  • Towards Intellectual Freedom in an AI Ethics Global Community, 2021, AI and Ethics

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Baeza-Yates include Ana Freire, Diana Ramírez-Cifuentes, Marc Spaniol, Luz Rello, and Maria Rauschenberger. The recurring partnerships suggest ongoing research collaborations across various topics related to AI and social computing.

Their publications appear frequently in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media
  • ACM SIGIR Forum
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Ethics and Information Technology

Baeza-Yates has been recognized with awards including becoming an IEEE Fellow in 2011 for contributions to computer science development and an ACM Fellow in 2009 for work on algorithms and information retrieval techniques.

Best Publications

  • Modern Information Retrieval

    Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates;Berthier Ribeiro-Neto

  • Information Retrieval: Data Structures and Algorithms

    William B. Frakes;Ricardo Baeza-Yates

  • Searching in metric spaces

    Edgar Chávez;Gonzalo Navarro;Ricardo Baeza-Yates;José Luis Marroquín

  • A new approach to text searching

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Gaston H. Gonnet

  • Handbook of algorithms and data structures : in Pascal and C

    G. H. Gonnet;R. Baeza-Yates

  • Query recommendation using query logs in search engines

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Carlos Hurtado;Marcelo Mendoza

  • Modern Information Retrieval: The Concepts and Technology Behind Search

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Berthier Ribeiro-Neto

  • Searching in the Plane

    R.A. Baezayates;J.C. Culberson;G.J.E. Rawlins

  • FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithm

    Meike Zehlike;Francesco Bonchi;Carlos Castillo;Sara Hajian

  • Inverted files

    Donna Harman;R. Baeza-Yates;Edward Fox;W. Lee

  • New indices for text: PAT Trees and PAT arrays

    Gaston H. Gonnet;Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates;Tim Snider

  • Bias on the web

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates

  • Extracting semantic relations from query logs

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Alessandro Tiberi

  • Proceedings of the 38th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Mounia Lalmas;Alistair Moffat;Berthier Ribeiro-Neto

  • Fast and flexible word searching on compressed text

    Edleno Silva de Moura;Gonzalo Navarro;Nivio Ziviani;Ricardo Baeza-Yates

  • Indexing methods for approximate string matching

    Gonzalo Navarro;Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates;Erkki Sutinen;Jorma Tarhio

  • Proximity Matching Using Fixed-Queries Trees

    Ricardo A. Baeza-Yates;Walter Cunto;Udi Manber;Sun Wu

  • Good fonts for dyslexia

    Luz Rello;Ricardo Baeza-Yates

  • The impact of caching on search engines

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Aristides Gionis;Flavio Junqueira;Vanessa Murdock

  • The intention behind web queries

    Ricardo Baeza-Yates;Liliana Calderón-Benavides;Cristina González-Caro

  • Proximal nodes: a model to query document databases by content and structure

    Gonzalo Navarro;Ricardo Baeza-Yates

  • Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE International Conference on Big Data

    Xiaohua Hu;Tsau Young Lin;Vijay Raghavan;Benjamin Wah

Frequent Co-Authors

Carlos Castillo
Carlos Castillo Pompeu Fabra University
Nivio Ziviani
Nivio Ziviani Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Fabrizio Silvestri
Fabrizio Silvestri Sapienza University of Rome
Yoelle Maarek
Yoelle Maarek Amazon (United States)
Horacio Saggion
Horacio Saggion Pompeu Fabra University
Alistair Moffat
Alistair Moffat University of Melbourne
Berthier Ribeiro-Neto
Berthier Ribeiro-Neto Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
Vanessa Murdock
Vanessa Murdock Amazon (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

While pursuing Computer Science in the USA opens doors to tech-driven careers, there are many related online degrees and pathways to consider. For those interested in leadership or advancing to managerial roles, exploring an online executive mba cost offers valuable insight into business management with a technology focus.

If your interests lean toward information management, an master in library science can lead to careers in digital archiving and database management—fields closely aligned with computer science skills.

Affordability is a key concern for many students. Thankfully, there are numerous affordable masters degrees available online, making advanced education accessible for a wider audience. These programs can complement or broaden your tech expertise.

For those aspiring to become leaders or influence organizational strategy with technology, a doctorate in leadership can provide the advanced knowledge and credentials needed to thrive in executive positions.

Best Scientists Citing Ricardo Baeza-Yates

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles