World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
37
Citations
6908
World Ranking
10615
National Ranking
4444

Yoelle Maarek publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoelle Maarek sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 137 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yoelle Maarek D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoelle Maarek sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - ACM Fellow For contributions to industrial leadership and to information retrieval and Web search.
  • 2010 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Yoelle Maarek is affiliated with Amazon in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with particular attention to subfields such as artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, sociology and political science, and information systems.

Their work covers a range of topics, including:

  • AI in Service Interactions
  • Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Topic Modeling

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Liane Lewin-Eytan
  • David Carmel
  • Simone Filice
  • Guy Horowitz
  • Chen Shani

Yoelle Maarek has published mainly in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Recent significant publications include:

  • "Alexa, Do You Want to Build a Snowman?" Characterizing Playful Requests to Conversational Agents, 2022, CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems Extended Abstracts
  • Alexa, Let's Work Together: Introducing the First Alexa Prize TaskBot Challenge on Conversational Task Assistance, 2022, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Alexa, let's work together! How Alexa Helps Customers Complete Tasks with Verbal and Visual Guidance in the Alexa Prize TaskBot Challenge, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia
  • "Alexa, what do you do for fun?" Characterizing playful requests with virtual assistants, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Generating Diverse Q&A Benchmarks for RAG Evaluation with DataMorgana, 2025, arXiv (Cornell University)

Yoelle Maarek has received notable recognitions, including being named an ACM Fellow in 2013 for contributions to industrial leadership and to information retrieval and web search. In 2010, they were also recognized as an ACM Distinguished Member.

Best Publications

  • Proceedings of the 35th international ACM SIGIR conference on Research and development in information retrieval

    William Hersh;Jamie Callan;Yoelle Maarek;Mark Sanderson

  • An information retrieval approach for automatically constructing software libraries

    Y.S. Maarek;D.M. Berry;G.E. Kaiser

  • The shark-search algorithm. An application: tailored Web site mapping

    Michael Hersovici;Michal Jacovi;Yoelle S. Maarek;Dan Pelleg

  • Searching XML documents via XML fragments

    David Carmel;Yoelle S. Maarek;Matan Mandelbrod;Yosi Mass

  • Static index pruning for information retrieval systems

    David Carmel;Doron Cohen;Ronald Fagin;Eitan Farchi

  • System, method and computer program product for performing unstructured information management and automatic text analysis, and providing multiple document views derived from different document tokenizations

    Andrei Z Broder;David Carmel;Arthur C Ciccolo;David Ferrucci

  • Automatic tag extraction from audio annotated photos

    Oren Somekh;Nadav Golbandi;Liran Katzir;Ronny Lempel

  • Automatically organizing bookmarks per contents

    Yoelle S. Maarek;Israel Z. Ben Shaul

  • The Power of Noise: Redefining Retrieval for RAG Systems

    Unknown

  • Learning from the past: answering new questions with past answers

    Anna Shtok;Gideon Dror;Yoelle Maarek;Idan Szpektor

  • WebCutter: a system for dynamic and tailorable site mapping

    Yoelle S. Maarek;Michal Jacovi;Menachem Shtalhaim;Sigalit Ur

  • Improving recommendation for long-tail queries via templates

    Idan Szpektor;Aristides Gionis;Yoelle Maarek

  • Integrating information retrieval and domain specific approaches for browsing and retrieval in object-oriented class libraries

    Richard Helm;Yoëlle S. Maarek

  • Full text indexing based on lexical relations an application: software libraries

    Y. S. Maarek;F. Z. Smadja

  • Do you want to take notes?: identifying research missions in Yahoo! search pad

    Debora Donato;Francesco Bonchi;Tom Chi;Yoelle Maarek

  • I want to answer; who has a question?: Yahoo! answers recommender system

    Gideon Dror;Yehuda Koren;Yoelle Maarek;Idan Szpektor

  • Ephemeral Document Clustering for Web Applications

    Yoelle S. Maarek;Ronald Fagin;Israel Z. Ben-Shaul;Dan Pelleg

  • Mobile information discovery

    Michal Jacovi;Terho Laakso;Yoelle Maarek;Sagee Rosen

  • Predicting web searcher satisfaction with existing community-based answers

    Qiaoling Liu;Eugene Agichtein;Gideon Dror;Evgeniy Gabrilovich

  • Interactive, tree structured, graphical visualization aid

    Yoelle Smadja Maarek;Pnina Vortman;Alan Jay Wecker

  • The Shark-Search Algorithm. An Application: Tailored Web Site Mapping.

    Michael Herscovici;Michal Jacovi;Yoëlle S. Maarek;Dan Pelleg

Frequent Co-Authors

David Carmel
David Carmel Amazon (Israel)
Ricardo Baeza-Yates
Ricardo Baeza-Yates Royal Institute of Technology
Gideon Dror
Gideon Dror Academic College of Tel Aviv-Yafo
Andrei Z. Broder
Andrei Z. Broder Google (United States)
Eugene Agichtein
Eugene Agichtein Emory University
Ronald Fagin
Ronald Fagin IBM (United States)
Gail E. Kaiser
Gail E. Kaiser Columbia University
Yehuda Koren
Yehuda Koren Google (United States)
Ingmar Weber
Ingmar Weber Saarland University
Susan T. Dumais
Susan T. Dumais Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Expanding your study beyond computer science opens valuable career opportunities across growing industries. Today, flexible online programs let you pursue specialized knowledge or switch fields without putting your life on hold.

For those interested in digital security, online cybersecurity master’s programs offer advanced skills for combating modern cyber threats—essential in almost every sector.

Aspiring to lead in the building and infrastructure sector? A masters in construction management can prepare you for roles overseeing complex projects and teams.

Those drawn to public service or law enforcement may consider the cheapest online criminal justice degrees. These programs provide foundational knowledge for in-demand criminal justice careers.

If business and finance appeal to you, exploring the best online accounting program could open doors to accounting, auditing, or financial analysis positions.

With so many accredited, affordable online degrees, you can shape a career path that matches your interests and ambitions while balancing your current commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Yoelle Maarek

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles