World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David Carmel

David Carmel

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
54
Citations
10464
World Ranking
4616
National Ranking
73

David Carmel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Carmel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 213 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Carmel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Carmel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

David Carmel is affiliated with Amazon (Israel) in Israel and has contributed to research primarily in the field of Computer Science, with a focus on Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, and Cognitive Neuroscience. Their work also intersects with Computer Science Applications and Sociology and Political Science.

Their research topics encompass:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Expert finding and Q&A systems
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior
  • Spam and Phishing Detection
  • Mobile Crowdsensing and Crowdsourcing
  • Psychology of Social Influence

David Carmel has published in various venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • Nature Neuroscience
  • ACM SIGWEB Newsletter
  • Journal of Vision

Their recent papers include:

  • "What makes a theory of consciousness unscientific?" (2025), Nature Neuroscience
  • "Alexa, Let's Work Together: Introducing the First Alexa Prize TaskBot Challenge on Conversational Task Assistance" (2022), arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "WSDM'21" (2021), ACM SIGWEB Newsletter
  • "IR Evaluation and Learning in the Presence of Forbidden Documents" (2022), Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval
  • "Analyzing the Support Level for Tips Extracted from Product Reviews" (2022), Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

Their research collaborations frequently involve co-authors such as Yoelle Maarek, Liane Lewin-Eytan, Eugene Agichtein, Simone Filice, and Guy Horowitz.

David Carmel was recognized as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Efficient query evaluation using a two-level retrieval process

    Andrei Z. Broder;David Carmel;Michael Herscovici;Aya Soffer

  • Social media recommendation based on people and tags

    Ido Guy;Naama Zwerdling;Inbal Ronen;David Carmel

  • Searching XML documents via XML fragments

    David Carmel;Yoelle S. Maarek;Matan Mandelbrod;Yosi Mass

  • Blocking blog spam with language model disagreement

    Gilad Mishne;David Carmel;Ronny Lempel

  • Personalized social search based on the user's social network

    David Carmel;Naama Zwerdling;Ido Guy;Shila Ofek-Koifman

  • Personalized recommendation of social software items based on social relations

    Ido Guy;Naama Zwerdling;David Carmel;Inbal Ronen

  • Static index pruning for information retrieval systems

    David Carmel;Doron Cohen;Ronald Fagin;Eitan Farchi

  • What makes a query difficult

    David Carmel;Elad Yom-Tov;Adam Darlow;Dan Pelleg

  • Learning to estimate query difficulty: including applications to missing content detection and distributed information retrieval

    Elad Yom-Tov;Shai Fine;David Carmel;Adam Darlow

  • System, method and computer program product for performing unstructured information management and automatic text analysis, and providing multiple document views derived from different document tokenizations

    Andrei Z Broder;David Carmel;Arthur C Ciccolo;David Ferrucci

  • Estimating the Query Difficulty for Information Retrieval

    David Carmel;Elad Yom-Tov

  • Predicting Query Performance by Query-Drift Estimation

    Anna Shtok;Oren Kurland;David Carmel;Fiana Raiber

  • Learning models of intelligent agents

    David Carmel;Shaul Markovitch

  • Enhancing cluster labeling using wikipedia

    David Carmel;Haggai Roitman;Naama Zwerdling

  • System, method and computer program product for performing unstructured information management and automatic text analysis, including a search operator functioning as a weighted and (WAND)

    Andrei Z Broder;David Carmel;Michael Herscovici;Aya Soffer

  • Information search using knowledge agents

    Yariv Aridor;David Carmel;Michael Herscovici;Yoelle Maarek-Smadja

  • Estimating the validity of the guilty knowledge test from simulated experiments: the external validity of mock crime studies

    David Carmel;Eran Dayan;Ayelet Naveh;Ori Raveh

  • The connectivity sonar: detecting site functionality by structural patterns

    Einat Amitay;David Carmel;Adam Darlow;Ronny Lempel

  • ERD'14: entity recognition and disambiguation challenge

    David Carmel;Ming-Wei Chang;Evgeniy Gabrilovich;Bo-June (Paul) Hsu

  • Unconscious orientation processing depends on perceptual load

    Bahador Bahrami;David Carmel;Vincent Walsh;Geraint Rees

  • Social recommender systems

    Ido Guy;David Carmel

  • The Connectivity Sonar: Detecting Site Functionality by Structural Patterns

    Ronny Lempel;Einat Amitay;David Carmel;Adam Darlow

Frequent Co-Authors

Elad Yom-Tov
Elad Yom-Tov Microsoft (United States)
Yoelle Maarek
Yoelle Maarek Amazon (United States)
Shaul Markovitch
Shaul Markovitch Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Andrei Z. Broder
Andrei Z. Broder Google (United States)
Eugene Agichtein
Eugene Agichtein Emory University
Ronald Fagin
Ronald Fagin IBM (United States)
Evgeniy Gabrilovich
Evgeniy Gabrilovich Google (United States)
Ming-Wei Chang
Ming-Wei Chang Google (United States)
Donna Harman
Donna Harman National Institute of Standards and Technology
Kuansan Wang
Kuansan Wang Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring computer science students in the USA have a wealth of flexible, online degree options to further their education and boost their career prospects. Many are drawn to accelerated programs such as 1 year online masters programs, which provide the convenience of rapid upskilling and a faster route to the workforce.

For those seeking advanced business roles in technology, exploring the cheapest mba programs online can be a strategic choice. These programs help develop essential leadership and management skills without breaking the bank.

Tech professionals interested in specialized fields may consider pursuing the best online masters in ai. These degrees open doors to innovative careers in artificial intelligence, data science, and machine learning.

If you’re searching for a quick transition into the job market, check out a variety of short careers that pay well. These programs can provide a great return on investment through high-paying roles with minimal study time.

Best Scientists Citing David Carmel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles