World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
40
Citations
16993
World Ranking
8034
National Ranking
4297

Mark Reiser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Reiser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 57 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mark Reiser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Reiser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark Reiser is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields including Psychology, Engineering, and Mathematics, with contributions also noted in the subfields of Developmental and Educational Psychology, Architecture, and Modeling and Simulation.

The scientist's work focuses particularly on topics related to Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences, Engineering Education and Pedagogy, and Mathematics Education and Programs.

Among their recent publications is the paper titled Using Push Technology for Maintaining Proficiency and Promoting a Growth Mindset in a STEM Course, published in 2021 in the Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice.

  • Using Push Technology for Maintaining Proficiency and Promoting a Growth Mindset in a STEM Course (2021, Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice)

Frequent co-authors include Carla van de Sande. Publication venues include:

  • Journal of Higher Education Theory and Practice

Their multidisciplinary approach integrates psychological principles with engineering and mathematical education, with special attention to promoting growth mindsets and proficiency in STEM fields.

Best Publications

  • The Relations of Regulation and Emotionality to Children's Externalizing and Internalizing Problem Behavior

    Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • Dispositional emotionality and regulation: their role in predicting quality of social functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Mark Reiser

  • Longitudinal Relations of Children’s Effortful Control, Impulsivity, and Negative Emotionality to Their Externalizing, Internalizing, and Co-Occurring Behavior Problems

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Tracy L. Spinrad;Amanda Cumberland

  • The Relations of Parental Warmth and Positive Expressiveness to Children's Empathy-Related Responding and Social Functioning: A Longitudinal Study

    Qing Zhou;Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra H. Losoya;Richard A. Fabes

  • Parental reactions to children's negative emotions: longitudinal relations to quality of children's social functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard;Ivanna K. Guthrie

  • The Relations of Effortful Control and Impulsivity to Children's Resiliency and Adjustment

    Nancy Eisenberg;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes;Mark Reiser

  • The relations of problem behavior status to children's negative emotionality, effortful control, and impulsivity: concurrent relations and prediction of change.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Adrienne Sadovsky;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • Prediction of elementary school children's externalizing problem behaviors from attentional and behavioral regulation and negative emotionality.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie Shepard

  • Prediction of Children’s Academic Competence From Their Effortful Control, Relationships, and Classroom Participation

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Jodi Swanson;Mark Reiser

  • The Relations of Regulation and Emotionality to Resiliency and Competent Social Functioning in Elementary School Children

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Richard A. Fabes;Mark Reiser

  • Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children's regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Richard A.P Fabes

  • Relation of Emotion-Related Regulation to Children's Social Competence: A Longitudinal Study

    Tracy L. Spinrad;Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Richard A. Fabes

  • Parental socialization of children's dysregulated expression of emotion and externalizing problems

    Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra Losoya;Richard A. Fabes;Ivanna K. Guthrie

  • Chinese children's effortful control and dispositional anger/frustration: relations to parenting styles and children's social functioning.

    Qing Zhou;Nancy Eisenberg;Yun Wang;Mark Reiser

  • Pathways to Problem Behaviors: Chaotic Homes, Parent and Child Effortful Control, and Parenting.

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Mark Reiser

  • Power Analysis for Complex Mediational Designs Using Monte Carlo Methods

    Felix Thoemmes;David P. MacKinnon;Mark R. Reiser

  • The relations of effortful control and ego control to children's resiliency and social functioning

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Richard A. Fabes;Cynthia L. Smith

  • Preschoolers’ academic readiness: What role does the teacher–child relationship play?

    Francisco Palermo;Laura D. Hanish;Carol Lynn Martin;Richard A. Fabes

  • The relations of effortful control and reactive control to children's externalizing problems: a longitudinal assessment.

    Carlos Valiente;Nancy Eisenberg;Cynthia L. Smith;Mark Reiser

  • The Developmental Trajectories of Attention Focusing, Attentional and Behavioral Persistence, and Externalizing Problems during School Age Years

    Qing Zhou;Claire Hofer;Nancy Eisenberg;Mark Reiser

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University
Tracy L. Spinrad
Tracy L. Spinrad Arizona State University
Richard A. Fabes
Richard A. Fabes Arizona State University
Sandra H. Losoya
Sandra H. Losoya Arizona State University
Carlos Valiente
Carlos Valiente Arizona State University
Ivanna K. Guthrie
Ivanna K. Guthrie Arizona State University
Stephanie A. Shepard
Stephanie A. Shepard Brown University
Jeffrey Liew
Jeffrey Liew Texas A&M University
Bridget C. Murphy
Bridget C. Murphy Arizona State University
Qing Zhou
Qing Zhou University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology opens up a range of educational and professional avenues, especially with the growth of online programs. If you’re interested in counseling, the requirements may vary based on your location. For instance, those aiming to become a mental health counselor in Santa Ana must complete a graduate degree, gain supervised experience, and meet licensing criteria.

Similarly, understanding the Scottsdale mental health counselor education requirements is essential, as Arizona may require additional coursework or practicum hours. In other regions, such as Washington, meeting the Seattle mental health counselor certification requirements involves passing a recognized exam and adhering to state-specific regulations.

For students considering a move or remote study, comparing the Spokane mental health counselor education requirements is also valuable. By reviewing these pathways, you can choose an online psychology degree that fits both your career goals and your local licensure requirements, helping you prepare for a rewarding role in mental health counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Reiser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles