World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stephanie A. Shepard

Stephanie A. Shepard

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10693 10011 5584 5098 33 14598

Stephanie A. Shepard publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Stephanie A. Shepard between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Stephanie A. Shepard published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 1999. 2 of the 37 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 1999. 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 0 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 0 publications 2025: 2 publications
1997 2025

37 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Stephanie A. Shepard: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 3
1998 2
1999 7
2000 2
2001 3
2002 2
2003 3
2004 5
2005 2
2006 1
2007 0
2008 0
2009 1
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 1
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
2024 0
2025 2
Total 37
Download as CSV

Stephanie A. Shepard publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie A. Shepard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 31–40 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 33 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6 33
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Stephanie A. Shepard D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephanie A. Shepard sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Stephanie A. Shepard is affiliated with Brown University in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work addresses multiple subfields including Infectious Diseases, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Health Informatics, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Family Practice.

Their research topics cover a range of areas related to healthcare and clinical settings, including:

  • Clostridium difficile and Clostridium perfringens research
  • Nosocomial Infections in ICU
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • COVID-19 diagnosis using AI
  • Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices

Stephanie A. Shepard has coauthored publications with several researchers, with some frequent collaborators being:

  • Jenna Wiens
  • Shengpu Tang
  • Ruby-Jean Clark
  • Erkin Ötleş
  • Melinda Seiler

They have contributed to publications in venues such as:

  • JAMA
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Their recent papers illustrate a strong focus on applications of artificial intelligence and infection prevention in hospital settings. These include:

  • Measuring the Impact of AI in the Diagnosis of Hospitalized Patients, 2023, JAMA
  • Guiding Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention Efforts in a Hospital Setting With AI, 2025, JAMA Network Open
  • 202. Targeting Clostridioides difficile Infection Prevention Efforts with Artificial Intelligence, 2025, Open Forum Infectious Diseases

Best Publications

  • The Relations of Regulation and Emotionality to Children's Externalizing and Internalizing Problem Behavior

    Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • The Relations of Parental Warmth and Positive Expressiveness to Children's Empathy-Related Responding and Social Functioning: A Longitudinal Study

    Qing Zhou;Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra H. Losoya;Richard A. Fabes

  • Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's social functioning from regulation and emotionality

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard;Bridget C. Murphy

  • Parental reactions to children's negative emotions: longitudinal relations to quality of children's social functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard;Ivanna K. Guthrie

  • The Relations of Effortful Control and Impulsivity to Children's Resiliency and Adjustment

    Nancy Eisenberg;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes;Mark Reiser

  • Mothers' emotional expressivity and children's behavior problems and social competence: mediation through children's regulation.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Elizabeth Thompson Gershoff;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard

  • Consistency and development of prosocial dispositions: A longitudinal study

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Bridget C. Murphy;Stephanie A. Shepard

  • The relations of problem behavior status to children's negative emotionality, effortful control, and impulsivity: concurrent relations and prediction of change.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Adrienne Sadovsky;Tracy L. Spinrad;Richard A. Fabes

  • Prosocial Development in Early Adulthood: A Longitudinal Study

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Amanda Cumberland;Bridget C. Murphy

  • Prediction of elementary school children's externalizing problem behaviors from attentional and behavioral regulation and negative emotionality.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie Shepard

  • Age Changes in Prosocial Responding and Moral Reasoning in Adolescence and Early Adulthood

    Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Ivanna K. Guthrie;Bridget C. Murphy

  • Regulation, emotionality, and preschoolers' socially competent peer interactions.

    Richard A. Fabes;Nancy Eisenberg;Sarah Jones;Melanie Smith

  • Longitudinal relations among parental emotional expressivity, children's regulation, and quality of socioemotional functioning.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Amanda Sheffield Morris;Richard A.P Fabes

  • Relation of Emotion-Related Regulation to Children's Social Competence: A Longitudinal Study

    Tracy L. Spinrad;Nancy Eisenberg;Amanda Cumberland;Richard A. Fabes

  • Parental socialization of children's dysregulated expression of emotion and externalizing problems

    Nancy Eisenberg;Sandra Losoya;Richard A. Fabes;Ivanna K. Guthrie

  • The relations of effortful control and ego control to children's resiliency and social functioning

    Nancy Eisenberg;Carlos Valiente;Richard A. Fabes;Cynthia L. Smith

  • Prediction of children's empathy-related responding from their effortful control and parents' expressivity.

    Carlos Valiente;Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard

  • Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's sympathy from dispositional regulation and emotionality.

    Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard;Bridget C. Murphy

  • Shyness and Children's Emotionality, Regulation, and Coping: Contemporaneous, Longitudinal, and Across-Context Relations

    Nancy Eisenberg;Stephanie A. Shepard;Richard A. Fabes;Bridget C. Murphy

  • Consistency and change in children's emotionality and regulation: A longitudinal study.

    Bridget C. Murphy;Nancy Eisenberg;Richard A. Fabes;Stephanie A. Shepard

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University
Richard A. Fabes
Richard A. Fabes Arizona State University
Ivanna K. Guthrie
Ivanna K. Guthrie Arizona State University
Bridget C. Murphy
Bridget C. Murphy Arizona State University
Sandra H. Losoya
Sandra H. Losoya Arizona State University
Mark Reiser
Mark Reiser Arizona State University
Carlos Valiente
Carlos Valiente Arizona State University
Tracy L. Spinrad
Tracy L. Spinrad Arizona State University
Qing Zhou
Qing Zhou University of California, Berkeley
Amanda Sheffield Morris
Amanda Sheffield Morris Oklahoma State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in psychology opens up diverse career pathways, especially in counseling and mental health services. From undergraduate to graduate programs, online options provide flexibility for students balancing work or family commitments. When comparing programs, it’s important to consider both academic reputation and overall value.

Regional factors can influence career prospects and the value of your degree. For example, choosing from the best value counseling programs in Pennsylvania may offer strong networking opportunities within the state. Similarly, students in urban areas can consider the most valuable counseling degrees in Philadelphia to gain access to a large professional community.

On the West Coast, the most valuable counseling programs in Seattle are recognized for their innovative approaches and strong job prospects. For those in the South, exploring the best value counseling degrees in Texas can lead to competitive salaries and growing demand.

As you plan your studies and career, comparing programs nationwide will help you make an informed decision about your education and future in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Stephanie A. Shepard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles