World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9491 8874 5031 4586 147 5860

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant between 2006 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant published across 20 years, from 2006 to 2025, averaging 8.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 20 publications in 2021. 19 of the 161 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2006 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 20. Peak 20 publications in 2021. 2006: 4 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 18 publications 2020: 14 publications 2021: 20 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 8 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 9 publications
2006 2025

161 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant: publications per year, 2006 to 2025
Year Publications
2006 4
2007 7
2008 4
2009 3
2010 3
2011 5
2012 5
2013 7
2014 7
2015 8
2016 6
2017 7
2018 3
2019 18
2020 14
2021 20
2022 13
2023 8
2024 10
2025 9
Total 161
Download as CSV

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 147 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597 147
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within psychology and social sciences, with a strong focus on child and adolescent development, cognitive processes, and social dynamics.

The main fields of study for Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant include:

  • Psychology
  • Social Sciences

Within these fields, they have contributed extensively to several subfields, such as:

  • Clinical Psychology
  • Education
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Social Psychology

Their work covers a range of topics, prominently featuring:

  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Cognitive Abilities and Testing
  • Sleep and related disorders
  • Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Youth Substance Use and School Attendance
  • Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior

Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant has published in various peer-reviewed journals. Some of the most frequent publication venues include:

  • Development and Psychopathology
  • SLEEP
  • Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology
  • Behavior Genetics
  • Developmental Psychology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Leah D. Doane
  • Daniel S. Shaw
  • Melvin N. Wilson
  • Sierra Clifford
  • Mary C. Davis

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant include:

  • "The long-term indirect effect of the early Family Check-Up intervention on adolescent internalizing and externalizing symptoms via inhibitory control" (2020), published in Development and Psychopathology
  • "Harsh Parenting Predicts Novel HPA Receptor Gene Methylation and NR3C1 Methylation Predicts Cortisol Daily Slope in Middle Childhood" (2020), published in Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology
  • "Family SES Is Associated with the Gut Microbiome in Infants and Children" (2021), published in Microorganisms
  • "Effortful Control Moderates the Relation Between Electronic-Media Use and Objective Sleep Indicators in Childhood" (2020), published in Psychological Science
  • "Second-by-second infant and mother emotion regulation and coregulation processes" (2021), published in Development and Psychopathology

Best Publications

  • Prediction of Children’s Academic Competence From Their Effortful Control, Relationships, and Classroom Participation

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Jodi Swanson;Mark Reiser

  • Pathways to Problem Behaviors: Chaotic Homes, Parent and Child Effortful Control, and Parenting.

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Mark Reiser

  • Postpartum depression prevalence and impact on infant health, weight, and sleep in low-income and ethnic minority women and infants.

    Jenna L. Gress-Smith;Linda J. Luecken;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Rose Howe

  • Prediction of Kindergartners' Academic Achievement from Their Effortful Control and Emotionality: Evidence for Direct and Moderated Relations.

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Jodi Swanson

  • Children's Effortful Control and Academic Competence: Mediation through School Liking

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Kimberly S. Castro

  • Examining the familial link between positive affect and empathy development in the second year.

    Michele M. Volbrecht;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Nazan Aksan;Carolyn Zahn-Waxler

  • Physiological Regulation and Fearfulness as Predictors of Young Children's Empathy-related Reactions

    Jeffrey Liew;Nancy Eisenberg;Tracy L. Spinrad;Natalie D. Eggum

  • Predicting Early Adolescents' Academic Achievement, Social Competence, and Physical Health from Parenting, Ego Resilience, and Engagement Coping.

    Jodi Swanson;Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;T. Caitlin O'Brien

  • Kindergartners' Temperament, Classroom Engagement, and Student–teacher Relationship: Moderation by Effortful Control

    Carlos Valiente;Jodi Swanson;Kathryn Lemery‐Chalfant

  • The development of stranger fear in infancy and toddlerhood: normative development, individual differences, antecedents, and outcomes.

    Rebecca J. Brooker;Kristin A. Buss;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Nazan Aksan

  • Genetic Relations Between Effortful and Attentional Control and Symptoms of Psychopathology in Middle Childhood.

    Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Lisa Doelger;H. Hill Goldsmith

  • Resilience in common life: introduction to the special issue.

    Mary C. Davis;Linda Luecken;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

  • Environmental influences on family similarity in afternoon cortisol levels: twin and parent-offspring designs.

    Jane E. Schreiber;Elizabeth Shirtcliff;Carol Van Hulle;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

  • Early Life Socioeconomic Disparities in Children’s Sleep: The Mediating Role of the Current Home Environment

    Leah D Doane;Reagan S Breitenstein;Charles Beekman;Sierra Clifford

  • Assessing internalizing, externalizing, and attention problems in young children: validation of the MacArthur HBQ.

    Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Jane E. Schreiber;Nicole L. Schmidt;Carol A. Van Hulle

  • Genetic and environmental influences on individual differences in cortisol level and circadian rhythm in middle childhood.

    Carol A. Van Hulle;Elizabeth A. Shirtcliff;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;H. Hill Goldsmith

  • COMT moderates the relation of daily maladaptive coping and pain in fibromyalgia

    Patrick H. Finan;Alex J. Zautra;Mary C. Davis;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

  • Genetic Influences on the Dynamics of Pain and Affect in Fibromyalgia

    Patrick H. Finan;Alex J. Zautra;Mary C. Davis;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

  • Children's shyness, popularity, school liking, cooperative participation, and internalizing problems in the early school years

    Natalie D. Eggum-Wilkens;Carlos Valiente;Jodi Swanson;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

  • Children's responses to daily social stressors: relations with parenting, children's effortful control, and adjustment.

    Carlos Valiente;Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant;Jodi Swanson

Frequent Co-Authors

H. Hill Goldsmith
H. Hill Goldsmith University of Wisconsin–Madison
Carlos Valiente
Carlos Valiente Arizona State University
Leah D. Doane
Leah D. Doane Arizona State University
Carol A. Van Hulle
Carol A. Van Hulle University of Wisconsin–Madison
Melvin N. Wilson
Melvin N. Wilson University of Virginia
Daniel S. Shaw
Daniel S. Shaw University of Pittsburgh
Mary C. Davis
Mary C. Davis Arizona State University
Tracy L. Spinrad
Tracy L. Spinrad Arizona State University
Nancy Eisenberg
Nancy Eisenberg Arizona State University
Thomas J. Dishion
Thomas J. Dishion Arizona State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens the door to a wide range of academic and professional options. Today, many students are exploring best college counseling programs in Illinois and similar programs nationwide to target specific interests such as clinical, school, or career counseling.

Online degrees in counseling blend theory with practical skills, allowing for flexible study schedules. Students based in metropolitan areas often look for specialized programs, such as Los Angeles counseling degree programs, which can offer unique internship and networking opportunities.

Several states, including Maryland and Michigan, are renowned for their accredited counseling programs. For example, aspiring counselors can review the best counseling degree programs in Maryland or explore options through the best counseling degree programs in Michigan. These programs often provide specialized tracks and strong connections to healthcare providers, schools, and clinics.

Whether you are beginning your academic journey or seeking career advancement, exploring these pathways can help you find the right fit and build meaningful, impactful careers in mental health and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles