World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
52
Citations
11443
World Ranking
4972
National Ranking
2730

Mary C. Davis publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Davis sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 141 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Mary C. Davis D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mary C. Davis sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mary C. Davis is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the fields of Medicine and Psychology. Their contributions encompass subfields such as Clinical Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Physiology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

Their research addresses several main topics including frailty in older adults, heart failure treatment and management, nutrition and health in aging, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, sleep and related disorders, early childhood education and development, and mindfulness and compassion interventions.

Recent notable publications authored by Mary C. Davis include:

  • Gender differences in the prevalence of frailty in heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis, 2021, International Journal of Cardiology

Frequent co-authors in their work are:

  • Quin E. Denfeld
  • Christopher S. Lee
  • Shirin O. Hiatt
  • Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant
  • Leah D. Doane

Mary C. Davis publishes regularly in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to the European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing, Circulation, Journal of Cardiac Failure, UNC Libraries, and Developmental Psychology.

In addition to journal articles, Mary C. Davis has contributed to book publications such as The Impacts of Vehicle Automation on the Public Transportation Workforce, published by Transportation Research Board eBooks in 2022, and UNITE History Volume 5 (1974-1992), published by Liverpool University Press in 2023.

Best Publications

  • Depression and cortisol responses to psychological stress: A meta-analysis

    Heather M. Burke;Mary C. Davis;Christian Otte;David C. Mohr;David C. Mohr

  • Positive Affect as a Source of Resilience for Women in Chronic Pain.

    Alex J. Zautra;Lisa M. Johnson;Mary C. Davis

  • Comparison of Cognitive Behavioral and Mindfulness Meditation Interventions on Adaptation to Rheumatoid Arthritis for Patients With and Without History of Recurrent Depression

    Alex J. Zautra;Mary C. Davis;John W. Reich;Perry Nicassario

  • Sex Differences in Physiological Responses to Stress and in Coronary Heart Disease: A Causal Link?

    Catherine M. Stoney;Mary C. Davis;Karen A. Matthews

  • Dynamic Approaches to Emotions and Stress in Everyday Life: Bolger and Zuckerman Reloaded with Positive as Well as Negative Affects

    Alex J. Zautra;Glenn G. Affleck;Howard Tennen;John W. Reich

  • Dimensions of Affect Relationships: Models and Their Integrative Implications

    John W. Reich;Alex J. Zautra;Mary Davis

  • Is life more difficult on Mars or Venus? A meta-analytic review of sex differences in major and minor life events.

    Mary C. Davis;Karen A. Matthews;Elizabeth W. Twamley

  • Chronic pain, stress, and the dynamics of affective differentiation.

    Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra;Bruce W. Smith

  • Vulnerability to stress among women in chronic pain from fibromyalgia and osteoarthritis.

    Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra;John W. Reich

  • Daily fatigue in women with osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, and fibromyalgia

    Alex J. Zautra;Robert Fasman;Brendt P. Parish;Mary C. Davis

  • Chronic stress and regulation of cellular markers of inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis: implications for fatigue.

    Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra;Jarred Younger;Sarosh J. Motivala

  • Resilience: Promoting Well-Being Through Recovery, Sustainability, and Growth

    Alex J. Zautra;Anne Arewasikporn;Mary C. Davis

  • Pain acceptance moderates the relation between pain and negative affect in female osteoarthritis and fibromyalgia patients

    Anna L. Kratz;Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra

  • The role of stressful events in the relationship between positive and negative affects: evidence from field and experimental studies.

    Alex J. Zautra;John W. Reich;Mary C. Davis;Phillip T. Potter

  • Fibromyalgia: Evidence for deficits in positive affect regulation

    Alex J. Zautra;Robert Fasman;John W. Reich;Peter Harakas

  • The impact of internalized homophobia on HIV preventive interventions.

    David M. Huebner;Mary C. Davis;Carol J. Nemeroff;Leona S. Aiken

  • Mindfulness and cognitive–behavioral interventions for chronic pain: Differential effects on daily pain reactivity and stress reactivity.

    Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra;Laurie D. Wolf;Howard Tennen

  • An Online Mindfulness Intervention Targeting Socioemotional Regulation in Fibromyalgia: Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial

    Mary C. Davis;Alex J. Zautra

  • The sociocultural model of eating disturbance in young women : The effects of personal attributes and family environment

    Elizabeth W. Twamley;Mary C. Davis

  • The effects of slow breathing on affective responses to pain stimuli: an experimental study

    Alex J Zautra;Robert Fasman;Mary C Davis;Arthur D Bud Craig

  • Perceived antigay discrimination and physical health outcomes.

    David M. Huebner;Mary C. Davis

Frequent Co-Authors

Alex J. Zautra
Alex J. Zautra Arizona State University
Howard Tennen
Howard Tennen University of Connecticut
John W. Reich
John W. Reich Arizona State University
Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant
Kathryn Lemery-Chalfant Arizona State University
Karen A. Matthews
Karen A. Matthews University of Pittsburgh
Michael R. Irwin
Michael R. Irwin University of California, Los Angeles
Leah D. Doane
Leah D. Doane Arizona State University
David M. Huebner
David M. Huebner George Washington University
Leona S. Aiken
Leona S. Aiken Arizona State University
Elizabeth W. Twamley
Elizabeth W. Twamley University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens the door to a wide range of rewarding and specialized career options. For those interested in education, there are diverse careers in school psychology which involve supporting students’ mental and emotional well-being in academic settings. Professionals in these roles often work closely with teachers and families to develop effective interventions and promote student success.

Another emerging field is spiritual psychology jobs, where practitioners integrate spiritual perspectives with psychological principles to help clients achieve personal growth and holistic well-being. This pathway appeals to those drawn to counseling that addresses the mind, body, and spirit.

If you are passionate about sports and performance, you might consider whether are sports psychologists in demand. Sports psychologists play a crucial role in helping athletes manage stress, boost motivation, and enhance performance, making it a growing and in-demand specialty.

It’s also important to understand the differences between key professional roles. If you’re choosing a clinical pathway, review the distinctions in clinical therapist vs psychologist roles and responsibilities to determine which aligns best with your interests and career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Mary C. Davis

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles