World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jack F. Schijven

Jack F. Schijven

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 49 5338 5114 143 137 146 7495

Jack F. Schijven publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Jack F. Schijven between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Jack F. Schijven published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 4.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2021. 13 of the 171 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2021. 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 7 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 5 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 9 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 5 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 6 publications
1989 2025

171 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Jack F. Schijven: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 3
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 7
1996 0
1997 0
1998 1
1999 1
2000 5
2001 1
2002 9
2003 2
2004 3
2005 8
2006 7
2007 3
2008 6
2009 3
2010 4
2011 5
2012 2
2013 14
2014 6
2015 5
2016 10
2017 5
2018 3
2019 8
2020 6
2021 15
2022 6
2023 6
2024 7
2025 6
Total 171
Download as CSV

Jack F. Schijven publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack F. Schijven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 146 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 146
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Jack F. Schijven D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jack F. Schijven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273 49
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Jack F. Schijven is affiliated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a notable concentration in water science and technology, environmental engineering, and pulmonary and respiratory medicine. Additional areas of study include health, toxicology and mutagenesis, as well as modeling and simulation.

The scientist's work covers several key topics:

  • Fecal contamination and water quality
  • Infection control and ventilation
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Urban stormwater management solutions
  • COVID-19 epidemiological studies
  • Child nutrition and water access
  • Water treatment and disinfection

Jack F. Schijven has contributed to research published in multiple venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Water Research
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Jack F. Schijven include:

  • Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via Breathing, Speaking, Singing, Coughing, and Sneezing (2021) - Environmental Health Perspectives
  • Exposure assessment for airborne transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via breathing, speaking, coughing and sneezing (2020) - bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

The data also lists papers related to the field, where Schijven is not the primary author but which indicate related research areas:

  • Nationwide surveillance reveals frequent detection of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales in Dutch municipal wastewater (2021) - The Science of The Total Environment
  • Modelling the interplay of future changes and wastewater management measures on the microbiological river water quality considering safe drinking water production (2020) - The Science of The Total Environment
  • A realistic transfer method reveals low risk of SARS-CoV-2 transmission via contaminated euro coins and banknotes (2021) - iScience

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers. Regular co-authors include:

  • Ana Maria de Roda Husman
  • Alfred Paul Blaschke
  • Lucie C. Vermeulen
  • Julia Derx
  • Regina Sommer

Best Publications

  • Removal of Viruses by Soil Passage: Overview of Modeling, Processes, and Parameters

    Jack F. Schijven;S. Majid Hassanizadeh

  • Evaluation of data from the literature on the transport and survival of Escherichia coli and thermotolerant coliforms in aquifers under saturated conditions

    J.W.A. Foppen;J.F. Schijven

  • Modeling removal of bacteriophages MS2 and PRD1 by dune recharge at Castricum, Netherlands

    Jack F. Schijven;Wim Hoogenboezem;S. Majid Hassanizadeh;Jos H. Peters

  • Quantitative assessment of infection risk from exposure to waterborne pathogens in urban floodwater

    H. de Man;H.H.J.L. van den Berg;E.J.T.M. Leenen;J.F. Schijven

  • Exposure assessment for swimmers in bathing waters and swimming pools.

    Franciska M. Schets;Jack F. Schijven;Ana Maria de Roda Husman

  • Monitoring of waterborne pathogens in surface waters in amsterdam, the Netherlands, and the potential health risk associated with exposure to cryptosporidium and giardia in these waters.

    F. M. Schets;J. H. van Wijnen;J. F. Schijven;H. Schoon

  • Risk of otitis externa after swimming in recreational fresh water lakes containing Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

    I. A. Van Asperen;C. M. De Rover;J. F. Schijven;Suparto Bambang Oetomo

  • Kinetic modeling of virus transport at the field scale.

    Unknown

  • QMRAspot: a tool for Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment from surface water to potable water.

    Jack F. Schijven;Peter F.M. Teunis;Saskia A. Rutjes;Martijn Bouwknegt

  • Elimination of viruses, bacteria and protozoan oocysts by slow sand filtration.

    W.A.M. Hijnen;J.F. Schijven;P. Bonné;A. Visser

  • Determining straining of Escherichia coli from breakthrough curves

    J.W.A. Foppen;A. Mporokoso;J.F. Schijven

  • Two-site kinetic modeling of bacteriophages transport through columns of saturated dune sand

    Jack F. Schijven;S.Majid Hassanizadeh;Ria H.A.M. de Bruin

  • Long-term inactivation study of three enteroviruses in artificial surface and groundwaters, using PCR and cell culture.

    A. M. de Roda Husman;W. J. Lodder;S. A. Rutjes;J. F. Schijven

  • Effect of humic acid on the attachment of Escherichia coli in columns of goethite-coated sand.

    Jan Willem Foppen;Yunus Liem;Jack Schijven

  • Removal of microorganisms by deep well injection

    Jack F Schijven;Gertjan Medema;Ad J Vogelaar;S.Majid Hassanizadeh

  • Modelling the sewage discharge and dispersion of Cryptosporidium and Giardia in surface water.

    G.J Medema;J.F Schijven

  • Transport of E. coli in columns of geochemically heterogeneous sediment

    J.W.A. Foppen;J.F. Schijven

  • Bacteriophages and Clostridium spores as indicator organisms for removal of pathogens by passage through saturated dune sand.

    J.F. Schijven;H.A.M. de Bruin;S.M. Hassanizadeh;A.M. de Roda Husman

  • Removal and fate of Cryptosporidium parvum, Clostridium perfringens and small-sized centric diatoms (Stephanodiscus hantzschii) in slow sand filters

    Wim A.M. Hijnen;Yolanda J. Dullemont;Jack F. Schijven;Anke J. Hanzens-Brouwer

  • Quantitative Microbial Risk Assessment for Airborne Transmission of SARS-CoV-2 via Breathing, Speaking, Singing, Coughing, and Sneezing.

    Jack Schijven;Lucie C. Vermeulen;Arno Swart;Adam Meijer

  • Virus Transport in Saturated and Unsaturated Sand Columns

    S. Torkzaban;S. M. Hassanizadeh;J. F. Schijven;H. A. M. de Bruin

  • Definition and quantification of initial anthropogenic pollutant release in swimming pools.

    M.G.A. Keuten;F.M. Schets;J.F. Schijven;J.Q.J.C. Verberk

Frequent Co-Authors

Ana Maria de Roda Husman
Ana Maria de Roda Husman Utrecht University
S. Majid Hassanizadeh
S. Majid Hassanizadeh Utrecht University
Gertjan Medema
Gertjan Medema Michigan State University
Scott A. Bradford
Scott A. Bradford Agricultural Research Service
Erwin Duizer
Erwin Duizer National Institute of Public Health and the Environment (RIVM)
Arie H. Havelaar
Arie H. Havelaar University of Florida
Nicholas J. Ashbolt
Nicholas J. Ashbolt Queensland University of Technology
Julia Walochnik
Julia Walochnik Medical University of Vienna
F. van Knapen
F. van Knapen Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise beyond Environmental Sciences, numerous related online degrees can open new career doors. For educators aiming to contribute at a higher level, exploring eds to edd program options offers a pathway to advanced leadership roles in environmental education and policy.

Social work intersects with environmental issues, especially in community sustainability and advocacy. Pursuing fully funded dsw programs online provides a unique opportunity for professionals to integrate social and environmental welfare at a doctoral level without a heavy financial burden.

For students seeking flexibility and affordability, cheapest online general studies degree programs serve as a versatile option. These programs allow learners to customize their education to include environmental topics while keeping costs manageable.

Finally, those new to online learning or balancing other commitments might consider some of the easiest bachelor's degree to get to gain foundational knowledge before specializing further. These degrees provide a smooth entry point into the environmental field.

Best Scientists Citing Jack F. Schijven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles