World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
23796
World Ranking
13770
National Ranking
6987

Mark R. Wick publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Wick sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 498 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark R. Wick D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark R. Wick sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark R. Wick is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research activity spans several areas within the field of Medicine, with a focus on Oncology, Dermatology, Surgery, Epidemiology, and Rheumatology. The scientific work principally covers topics related to cancer and skin lesions, ear and head tumors, vascular tumors and angiosarcomas, renal transplantation outcomes and treatments, nonmelanoma skin cancer studies, tumors and oncological cases, as well as urologic and reproductive health conditions.

Their recent papers include a variety of clinical and pathological studies published between 2020 and 2022. Key publications are:

  • PRAME immunohistochemistry as an adjunct for diagnosis and histological margin assessment in lentigo maligna (2020) in Histopathology
  • Histomorphological and immunophenotypical spectrum of cutaneous myoepitheliomas: A series of 35 cases (2020) in Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
  • Surgical site infections after simultaneous pancreas kidney and pancreas transplantation in the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study (2022) in Journal of Hospital Infection
  • Inflammatory lobular hemangioma: A vascular proliferation with a prominent lymphoid component. Review of a series of 19 cases (2020) in Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
  • Glioma-Associated Oncogene-1 Expression in Basal Cell Carcinoma and Its Histologic Mimics (2020) in American Journal of Dermatopathology

The following publication venues are frequent channels for their work:

  • Journal of Cutaneous Pathology
  • Histopathology
  • Journal of Hospital Infection
  • American Journal of Dermatopathology
  • Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Mark R. Wick frequently collaborates with several co-authors who have contributed to multiple publications together. These include:

  • Oriol Manuel
  • Alejandro A. Gru
  • Christian van Delden
  • Nicolas J. Mueller
  • Maxwell L. Smith

The scientist's work addresses complex medical conditions, such as various cancers affecting the skin and head regions, vascular proliferations, and post-transplant infectious complications. Such research intersects clinical pathology, surgery, and epidemiological studies, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach within medical sciences.

Best Publications

  • Thymoma. A clinicopathologic review.

    Jean E. Lewis;Mark R. Wick;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Philip E. Bernatz

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of Malignant Mesothelioma: 2017 Update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group

    Aliya Noor Husain;Thomas V. Colby;Nelson G. Ordóñez;Timothy Craig Allen

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: 2012 update of the consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

    Aliya N. Husain;Thomas Colby;Nelson Ordonez;Thomas Krausz

  • Pleuropulmonary blastoma the so-called pulmonary blastoma of childhood

    J. Carlos Manivel;John R. Priest;Jan Watterson;Marie E Steiner

  • Guidelines for pathologic diagnosis of malignant mesothelioma: a consensus statement from the International Mesothelioma Interest Group.

    Aliya N. Husain;Thomas V. Colby;Nelson G. Ordóñez;Thomas Krausz

  • Primary thymic carcinomas.

    M R Wick;B W Scheithauer;L H Weiland;P E Bernatz

  • Whole Slide Imaging Versus Microscopy for Primary Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology: A Multicenter Blinded Randomized Noninferiority Study of 1992 Cases (Pivotal Study).

    Sanjay Mukhopadhyay;Michael D. Feldman;Esther Abels;Raheela Ashfaq

  • Reassessment of malignant "angioendotheliomatosis". Evidence in favor of its reclassification as "intravascular lymphomatosis".

    Mark R. Wick;Stacey E. Mills;Bernd W. Scheithauer;Philip H. Cooper

  • Detailed Studies on Expression and Function of CD19 Surface Determinant by Using B43 Monoclonal Antibody and the Clinical Potential of Anti-CD19 Immunotoxins

    Fatih M. Uckun;Waclaw Jaszcz;Julian L. Ambrus;Anthony S. Fauci

  • Immunohistochemistry of germ cell and trophoblastic neoplasms.

    Gloria A. Niehans;J. Carlos Manivel;Gary T. Copland;Bernd W. Scheithauer

  • Immunohistochemical staining for TLE1 distinguishes synovial sarcoma from histologic mimics.

    Wai Chin Foo;Michael W. Cruise;Mark R. Wick;Jason L. Hornick

  • Homologous Carcinomas of the Breasts, Skin, and Salivary Glands: A Histologic and Immunohistochemical Comparison of Ductal Mammary Carcinoma, Ductal Sweat Gland Carcinoma, and Salivary Duct Carcinoma

    Mark R. Wick;Daniel M. Ockner;Stacey E. Mills;Jon H. Ritter

  • Adnexal carcinomas of the skin. II: Extraocular sebaceous carcinomas

    Mark R. Wick;John R. Goellner;James T. Wolfe;W. P. Daniel Su

  • Localized malignant mesothelioma.

    Timothy Craig Allen;Philip T. Cagle;Andrew M. Churg;Thomas V. Colby

  • Hepatitis B virus replication in diverse cell types during chronic hepatitis B virus infection

    Andrew Mason;Mark Wick;Heather White;Robert Perrillo;Robert Perrillo

  • Small cell undifferentiated carcinoma of the urinary bladder. A light-microscopic, immunocytochemical, and ultrastructural study of 12 cases

    Stacey E. Mills;James T. Wolfe;Mark A. Weiss;Paul E. Swanson

  • Adnexal carcinomas of the skin I. Eccrine carcinomas

    Mark R. Wick;John R. Goellner;James T. Wolfe;W. P. Daniel Su

  • Primitive polypoid granular-cell tumor and other cutaneous granular-cell neoplasms of apparent nonneural origin.

    Philip LeBoit;Ronald Barr;Steven Burall;John Metcalf

  • Renal cell carcinoma with rhabdoid features.

    Neriman Gökden;Oscar Nappi;Paul E. Swanson;John D. Pfeifer

  • Sarcomas of bone complicating osteitis deformans (Paget's disease): fifty years' experience.

    M R Wick;G P Siegal;K K Unni;R A McLeod

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul E. Swanson
Paul E. Swanson University of Washington
Stacey E. Mills
Stacey E. Mills University of Virginia
Louis P. Dehner
Louis P. Dehner Washington University in St. Louis
Mario Plebani
Mario Plebani University of Padua
Nader Rifai
Nader Rifai Boston Children's Hospital
Alan H.B. Wu
Alan H.B. Wu University of California, San Francisco
Carlo Brugnara
Carlo Brugnara Boston Children's Hospital
Andrew Churg
Andrew Churg University of British Columbia
Saul Suster
Saul Suster Medical College of Wisconsin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in expanding their expertise or pursuing alternative healthcare careers, a variety of online degrees are available. Many students opt for a nutrition degree online, which provides a strong foundation in health and wellness and opens doors in clinical, community, and industry settings.

Aspiring healthcare administrators can advance with cahme-accredited online mha programs. These programs offer a flexible path to leadership roles in hospitals, clinics, and healthcare organizations.

For nurses aiming to further their credentials, rn to bsn online programs without clinicals allow working professionals to complete degree requirements without the need for additional clinical hours. This is a convenient option for RNs seeking advanced positions or higher pay.

Those pursuing the highest levels of nursing practice may consider the fastest dnp online program. These accelerated options help experienced nurses gain their Doctor of Nursing Practice degree efficiently, supporting career growth in advanced practice, administration, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Mark R. Wick

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles