World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michal Michal

Michal Michal

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
29660
World Ranking
17861
National Ranking
12

Michal Michal publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Michal sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 765 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Michal Michal D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michal Michal sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michal Michal is affiliated with Charles University in the Czech Republic. Their research primarily spans medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, contributing to a significant body of work across these fields.

Their work includes a focus on subfields such as pulmonary and respiratory medicine, molecular biology, surgery, oncology, and rheumatology. Major topics covered by Michal Michal's research include sarcoma diagnosis and treatment, renal cell carcinoma treatment, renal and related cancers, salivary gland tumors diagnosis and treatment, ear and head tumors, oral and maxillofacial pathology, and various tumors and oncological cases.

Michal Michal has coauthored publications with several frequent collaborators, including Nikola Ptáková, Michael Michal, Abbas Agaimy, Ondřej Hes, and Reza Alaghehbandan.

The scientist's research contributions have been published prominently in multiple venues. These include:

  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Modern Pathology
  • Annals of Diagnostic Pathology
  • The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Human Pathology

Among their recent published papers are:

  • Expanding the Molecular Spectrum of Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Glands With a Novel VIM-RET Fusion (2020), published in The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/MTOR mutations: next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases (2021), published in Modern Pathology
  • Histologic Classification and Molecular Signature of Polymorphous Adenocarcinoma (PAC) and Cribriform Adenocarcinoma of Salivary Gland (CASG) (2020), published in The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Alterations in key signaling pathways in sinonasal tract melanoma. A molecular genetics and immunohistochemical study of 90 cases and comprehensive review of the literature (2022), published in Modern Pathology
  • Correction to: Eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT) of kidney demonstrates sporadic TSC/MTOR mutations: next-generation sequencing multi-institutional study of 19 cases (2021), published in Modern Pathology

Best Publications

  • Mammary analogue secretory carcinoma of salivary glands, containing the ETV6-NTRK3 fusion gene: a hitherto undescribed salivary gland tumor entity.

    Alena Skálová;Tomas Vanecek;Radek Sima;Jan Laco

  • Most osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors are a single histopathologic entity: an analysis of 32 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Julie C. Fanburg-Smith;Steven D. Billings;Michele Bisceglia

  • Succinate dehydrogenase (SDH)-deficient renal carcinoma: a morphologically distinct entity: a clinicopathologic series of 36 tumors from 27 patients.

    Anthony J. Gill;Anthony J. Gill;Ondrej Hes;Thomas Papathomas;Monika Šedivcová

  • High-grade urothelial carcinoma of the renal pelvis: clinicopathologic study of 108 cases with emphasis on unusual morphologic variants

    Delia Perez-Montiel;Paul E Wakely;Ondrej Hes;Michal Michal

  • Spindle cell lipoma-like tumor, solitary fibrous tumor and myofibroblastoma of the breast: a clinico-pathological analysis of 13 cases in favor of a unifying histogenetic concept

    Gaetano Magro;Michele Bisceglia;Michal Michal;Vincenzo Eusebi

  • Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Glands With High-grade Transformation: Report of 3 Cases With the ETV6-NTRK3 Gene Fusion and Analysis of TP53, β-Catenin, EGFR, and CCND1 Genes

    Alena Skálová;Tomas Vanecek;Hanna Majewska;Jan Laco

  • A clinicopathologic study of 45 pediatric soft tissue tumors with an admixture of adipose tissue and fibroblastic elements, and a proposal for classification as lipofibromatosis.

    John F. Fetsch;Markku Miettinen;William B. Laskin;Michal Michal

  • SWI/SNF Complex-deficient Undifferentiated/Rhabdoid Carcinomas of the Gastrointestinal Tract: A Series of 13 Cases Highlighting Mutually Exclusive Loss of SMARCA4 and SMARCA2 and Frequent Co-inactivation of SMARCB1 and SMARCA2.

    Abbas Agaimy;Ondrej Daum;Bruno Märkl;Ines Lichtmannegger

  • Mammary Analogue Secretory Carcinoma of Salivary Glands: Molecular Analysis of 25 ETV6 Gene Rearranged Tumors With Lack of Detection of Classical ETV6-NTRK3 Fusion Transcript by Standard RT-PCR: Report of 4 Cases Harboring ETV6-X Gene Fusion.

    Alena Skálová;Tomas Vanecek;Roderick H.W. Simpson;Jan Laco

  • Benign mixed epithelial and stromal tumor of the kidney.

    Michal Michal;Martin Syrucek

  • Mucinous Carcinoma of the Skin, Primary, and Secondary A Clinicopathologic Study of 63 Cases With Emphasis on the Morphologic Spectrum of Primary Cutaneous Forms: Homologies With Mucinous Lesions in the Breast

    Dmitry V Kazakov;Saul Suster;Philip E LeBoit;Eduardo Calonje

  • Molecular Profiling of Mammary Analog Secretory Carcinoma Revealed a Subset of Tumors Harboring a Novel ETV6-RET Translocation: Report of 10 Cases.

    Alena Skalova;Tomas Vanecek;Petr Martinek;Ilan Weinreb

  • Lesions of anogenital mammary-like glands: an update.

    Dmitry V. Kazakov;Dominic V. Spagnolo;Denisa Kacerovska;Michal Michal

  • Pigmented (melanotic) neurofibroma: a clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical analysis of 19 lesions from 17 patients.

    John F. Fetsch;Michal Michal;Markku Miettinen

  • Primary thyroid-like follicular carcinoma of the kidney: report of 6 cases of a histologically distinctive adult renal epithelial neoplasm.

    Mahul B. Amin;Ruta Gupta;Hes Ondrej;Jesse K. McKenney

  • Myoepitheliomas of the skin and soft tissues. Report of 12 cases.

    M. Michal;Markku Miettinen

  • Morphologic diversity of malignant neoplasms arising in preexisting spiradenoma, cylindroma, and spiradenocylindroma based on the study of 24 cases, sporadic or occurring in the setting of Brooke-Spiegler syndrome.

    Dmitry V Kazakov;Bernhard Zelger;Arno Rütten;Marina Vazmitel

  • Mixed epithelial and stromal tumors of the kidney. A report of 22 cases

    Michal Michal;Ondrej Hes;Michele Bisceglia;Roderick H. W. Simpson

  • Sporadic hybrid oncocytic/chromophobe tumor of the kidney: a clinicopathologic, histomorphologic, immunohistochemical, ultrastructural, and molecular cytogenetic study of 14 cases.

    Fredrik Petersson;Zoran Gatalica;Petr Grossmann;Maria Delia Perez Montiel

  • Cribriform adenocarcinoma of the tongue: a hitherto unrecognized type of adenocarcinoma characteristically occurring in the tongue

    M. Michal;A. Skalova;R. H. W. Simpson;W. F. Raslan

Frequent Co-Authors

Saul Suster
Saul Suster Medical College of Wisconsin
Guido Martignoni
Guido Martignoni University of Verona
Markku Miettinen
Markku Miettinen National Cancer Institute
Arndt Hartmann
Arndt Hartmann University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Thomas Mentzel
Thomas Mentzel Friedrich Schiller University Jena
Eduardo Calonje
Eduardo Calonje St Thomas' Hospital
Cyril Fisher
Cyril Fisher Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Anthony J. Gill
Anthony J. Gill University of Sydney
Lester D. R. Thompson
Lester D. R. Thompson Kaiser Permanente
Ximing J. Yang
Ximing J. Yang Northwestern University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Choosing the right pathway in healthcare education is essential, especially for those looking to fast-track their careers or seek flexible learning options. For nurses aspiring to higher roles, the shortest msn to dnp program offers a streamlined route to advanced practice and leadership positions. These accelerated programs allow working professionals to complete their degrees quickly without compromising educational quality.

Affordability remains a key issue, with many students seeking the cheapest online dnp programs to minimize debt and better manage costs. Similarly, entry-level pathways like a fast lpn program provide opportunities for rapid entry into the nursing field, which is crucial for individuals eager to start working sooner.

Mental health specialization is also in demand, and many professionals are considering options such as an online psych np programs. These programs cater to those passionate about delivering mental health care and seeking flexible online study. Exploring these diverse online degrees and career pathways can help students find the best fit for their goals in the US medical field.

Best Scientists Citing Michal Michal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles