World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Andrew L. Folpe

Andrew L. Folpe

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
26551
World Ranking
13698
National Ranking
6957

Andrew L. Folpe publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew L. Folpe sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 356 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Andrew L. Folpe D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew L. Folpe sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew L. Folpe is a researcher affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States. Their scholarly work primarily spans across the field of Medicine, with a special focus on subfields including Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Rheumatology, Oncology, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, and Neurology.

Their research topics cover a range of clinical and pathological areas, notably:

  • Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Soft tissue tumor case studies
  • Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas
  • Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Tumors and Oncological Cases
  • Neurofibromatosis and Schwannoma Cases
  • Cardiac tumors and thrombi

Some recent papers that represent their research interests include:

  • Radiation Therapy for Treatment of Soft Tissue Sarcoma in Adults: Executive Summary of an ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline, 2021, Practical Radiation Oncology
  • Mesenchymal tumors of the gastrointestinal tract with NTRK rearrangements: a clinicopathological, immunophenotypic, and molecular study of eight cases, emphasizing their distinction from gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), 2020, Modern Pathology
  • Head and Neck Mesenchymal Neoplasms With GLI1 Gene Alterations, 2020, The American Journal of Surgical Pathology
  • Myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma-a clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, molecular genetic and epigenetic study of 12 cases, suggesting a possible relationship with conventional pleomorphic liposarcoma, 2021, Modern Pathology
  • Lipoblastomas presenting in older children and adults: analysis of 22 cases with identification of novel PLAG1 fusion partners, 2020, Modern Pathology

Folpe has collaborated frequently with various researchers, including:

  • Karen Fritchie
  • Elizabeth G. Demicco
  • Yuri Fedoriw
  • Sarah Dry
  • William C. Faquin

Publications by Folpe have appeared notably in the following venues:

  • Modern Pathology
  • Laboratory Investigation
  • Human Pathology
  • Archiv für Pathologische Anatomie und Physiologie und für Klinische Medicin
  • Histopathology

Best Publications

  • Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms of soft tissue and gynecologic origin: a clinicopathologic study of 26 cases and review of the literature.

    Andrew L Folpe;Thomas Mentzel;Hans-Anton Lehr;Cyril Fisher

  • Atypical and malignant glomus tumors: analysis of 52 cases, with a proposal for the reclassification of glomus tumors.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Julie C. Fanburg-Smith;Markku Miettinen;Sharon W. Weiss

  • Most osteomalacia-associated mesenchymal tumors are a single histopathologic entity: an analysis of 32 cases and a comprehensive review of the literature.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Julie C. Fanburg-Smith;Steven D. Billings;Michele Bisceglia

  • Pathology of Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors: Diagnostic Overview and Update on Selected Diagnostic Problems

    Fausto J. Rodriguez;Andrew L. Folpe;Caterina Giannini;Arie Perry

  • Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms: pathology and pathogenesis

    Andrew L. Folpe;David J. Kwiatkowski

  • Kaposiform hemangioendothelioma: a study of 33 cases emphasizing its pathologic, immunophenotypic, and biologic uniqueness from juvenile hemangioma.

    Lisa L Lyons;Paula E North;Fernand Mac-Moune Lai;Mark H Stoler

  • Morphologic and immunophenotypic diversity in Ewing family tumors: a study of 66 genetically confirmed cases.

    Andrew L Folpe;John R Goldblum;Brian P Rubin;Bahig M Shehata

  • Low-grade fibromyxoid sarcoma and hyalinizing spindle cell tumor with giant rosettes: a clinicopathologic study of 73 cases supporting their identity and assessing the impact of high-grade areas.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Kathryn L. Lane;Gerson Paull;Sharon W. Weiss

  • Immunohistochemical detection of FLI-1 protein expression: a study of 132 round cell tumors with emphasis on CD99-positive mimics of Ewing's sarcoma/primitive neuroectodermal tumor.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Charles E. Hill;David M. Parham;Patricia A. O'shea

  • Thyroid Transcription Factor-1 Is Expressed in Extrapulmonary Small Cell Carcinomas but Not in Other Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Tumors

    S Nicholas Agoff;Laura W Lamps;Abraham T Philip;Mahul B Amin

  • Expression of Fli-1, a Nuclear Transcription Factor, Distinguishes Vascular Neoplasms From Potential Mimics

    Andrew L. Folpe;Eric M. Chand;John R. Goldblum;Sharon W. Weiss

  • (F-18) fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography as a predictor of pathologic grade and other prognostic variables in bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Robert H. Lyles;Jason T. Sprouse;E. U. Conrad

  • Clear cell myomelanocytic tumor of the falciform ligament/ligamentum teres: a novel member of the perivascular epithelioid clear cell family of tumors with a predilection for children and young adults.

    Andrew L. Folpe;Zachary D. Goodman;Kamal G. Ishak;Augusto F. G. Paulino

  • Common Musculoskeletal Tumors of Childhood and Adolescence

    Carola A.S. Arndt;Peter S. Rose;Andrew L. Folpe;Nadia N. Laack

  • Poorly Differentiated Synovial Sarcoma: Immunohistochemical Distinction From Primitive Neuroectodermal Tumors and High-grade Malignant Peripheral Nerve Sheath Tumors

    Andrew L. Folpe;Rodney A. Schmidt;Douglas Chapman;Allen M. Gown

  • Alveolar soft-part sarcoma: a review and update

    A L Folpe;A T Deyrup

  • Thyroid transcription factor-1: immunohistochemical evaluation in pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors.

    A L Folpe;A M Gown;L W Lamps;R Garcia

  • Distribution of cytokeratins and vimentin in adult renal neoplasms and normal renal tissue: potential utility of a cytokeratin antibody panel in the differential diagnosis of renal tumors.

    Brian F Skinnider;Andrew L Folpe;Randolph A Hennigar;So Dug Lim

  • Activation of the mTOR pathway in sporadic angiomyolipomas and other perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms.

    Heidi Kenerson;Andrew L. Folpe;Thomas K. Takayama;Raymond S. Yeung

  • Cutaneous Angiosarcoma Following Breast-conserving Surgery and Radiation: An Analysis of 27 Cases

    Steven D Billings;Jesse K McKenney;Andrew L Folpe;Michael C Hardacre

Frequent Co-Authors

Sharon W. Weiss
Sharon W. Weiss Emory University
Mahul B. Amin
Mahul B. Amin University of Tennessee Health Science Center
John R. Goldblum
John R. Goldblum Cleveland Clinic
Allen M. Gown
Allen M. Gown University of British Columbia
Brian P. Rubin
Brian P. Rubin Cleveland Clinic
John C. Cheville
John C. Cheville Mayo Clinic
Cyril Fisher
Cyril Fisher Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
Cynthia Cohen
Cynthia Cohen Emory University
Esther Oliva
Esther Oliva Harvard University
Elizabeth A. Montgomery
Elizabeth A. Montgomery University of Miami

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in studying Medicine in the USA but want to explore alternative or complementary career routes, there are several dynamic pathways available. These options offer flexibility and can open doors to a wide variety of health professions.

Nursing remains a popular and rewarding field. Individuals looking for a more streamlined admissions process can find a nursing school that doesn't require teas or HESI exams—a great choice if you want to avoid extra testing requirements.

For those drawn to the organizational side of healthcare, an online healthcare administration degree helps prepare graduates for leadership and management roles in hospitals, clinics, and related settings.

Current nurses seeking career advancement may consider adn to fnp bridge programs to move efficiently from an associate degree in nursing to an advanced practice nurse position, such as Family Nurse Practitioner.

Additionally, if nutrition and wellness interest you, the best online food science degree programs offer training for careers in nutrition, health education, and food safety—all delivered with online flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew L. Folpe

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles