World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
79
Citations
34826
World Ranking
17363
National Ranking
8698

Saibal Kar publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saibal Kar sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 339 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Saibal Kar D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Saibal Kar sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Saibal Kar is affiliated with the David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine with a strong emphasis on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

The subfields of study within Kar's work include:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Epidemiology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

Their main topics of work address various cardiovascular conditions and treatments, detailed as follows:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

Saibal Kar has contributed to numerous scientific papers, some of which include:

  • Primary Outcome Evaluation of a Next-Generation Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device, 2021, Circulation
  • Transcatheter Repair for Patients with Tricuspid Regurgitation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Five-Year Follow-up after Transcatheter Repair of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation, 2023, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Thirty-Day Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Replacement for Degenerated Mitral Bioprostheses (Valve-in-Valve), Failed Surgical Rings (Valve-in-Ring), and Native Valve With Severe Mitral Annular Calcification (Valve-in-Mitral Annular Calcification) in the United States, 2020, Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
  • 3-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Heart Failure, 2021, Journal of the American College of Cardiology

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Gregg W. Stone
  • JoAnn Lindenfeld
  • William T. Abraham
  • Michael J. Mack
  • Federico M. Asch

Saibal Kar's research has been published in several key venues, reflecting their active engagement in cardiovascular research:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions
  • Circulation
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions

Best Publications

  • Percutaneous Repair or Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation

    Ted Feldman;Elyse Foster;Donald G. Glower;Saibal Kar

  • Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure.

    Gregg W. Stone;JoAnn Lindenfeld;William T. Abraham;Saibal Kar

  • Prospective Randomized Evaluation of the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage Closure Device in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation Versus Long-Term Warfarin Therapy: The PREVAIL Trial

    David R. Holmes;Saibal Kar;Matthew J. Price;Brian Whisenant

  • Closure or Medical Therapy for Cryptogenic Stroke with Patent Foramen Ovale

    Anthony J. Furlan;Mark Reisman;Joseph Massaro;Laura Mauri

  • Percutaneous mitral repair with the MitraClip system: safety and midterm durability in the initial EVEREST (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge REpair Study) cohort.

    Ted Feldman;Saibal Kar;Michael Rinaldi;Peter Fail

  • Safety of Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure Results From the Watchman Left Atrial Appendage System for Embolic Protection in Patients With AF (PROTECT AF) Clinical Trial and the Continued Access Registry

    Vivek Y. Reddy;David Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Petr Neuzil

  • Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure vs Warfarin for Atrial Fibrillation A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Vivek Y Reddy;Horst Sievert;Jonathan Halperin;Shephal K Doshi

  • 5-Year Outcomes After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: From the PREVAIL and PROTECT AF Trials

    Vivek Y. Reddy;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Douglas N. Gibson

  • Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation 5-Year Results of EVEREST II

    Ted Feldman;Saibal Kar;Sammy Elmariah;Steven C. Smart

  • The clinical impact of incomplete left atrial appendage closure with the Watchman Device in patients with atrial fibrillation: a PROTECT AF (Percutaneous Closure of the Left Atrial Appendage Versus Warfarin Therapy for Prevention of Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation) substudy.

    Juan F. Viles-Gonzalez;Saibal Kar;Pamela Douglas;Srinivas Dukkipati

  • Acute and 12-Month Results With Catheter-Based Mitral Valve Leaflet Repair: The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study

    Patrick L. Whitlow;Ted Feldman;Wes R. Pedersen;D. Scott Lim

  • Left Atrial Appendage Closure as an Alternative to Warfarin for Stroke Prevention in Atrial Fibrillation: A Patient-Level Meta-Analysis

    David R. Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi;Saibal Kar;Matthew J. Price

  • Percutaneous mitral valve repair for mitral regurgitation in high-risk patients: results of the EVEREST II study.

    Donald D. Glower;Saibal Kar;Alfredo Trento;D. Scott Lim

  • Comparison of Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery With Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

    Michael S. Lee;Nikhil Kapoor;Faizi Jamal;Lawrence Czer

  • Outcomes With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in the United States: An STS/ACC TVT Registry Report.

    Paul Sorajja;Sreekanth Vemulapalli;Ted Feldman;Michael Mack

  • Mechanisms of Cardiac Nerve Sprouting After Myocardial Infarction in Dogs

    Shengmei Zhou;Lan S. Chen;Yasushi Miyauchi;Mizuho Miyauchi

  • Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination.

    Sergio L. Kobal;Luca Trento;Simin Baharami;Kirsten Tolstrup

  • Physician-Directed Patient Self-Management of Left Atrial Pressure in Advanced Chronic Heart Failure

    Jay Ritzema;Richard Troughton;Iain Melton;Ian Crozier

  • Device-Related Thrombus After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes.

    Srinivas R. Dukkipati;Saibal Kar;David R. Holmes;Shephal K. Doshi

  • Iconographies supplémentaires de l'article : Comparison of Effectiveness of Hand-Carried Ultrasound to Bedside Cardiovascular Physical Examination

    Sergio L Kobal;Luca Trento;Simin Baharami;Kirsten Tolstrup

Frequent Co-Authors

Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Prediman K. Shah
Prediman K. Shah Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
James S. Forrester
James S. Forrester Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Robert J. Siegel
Robert J. Siegel Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Elyse Foster
Elyse Foster University of California, San Francisco
Ted Feldman
Ted Feldman Edwards Lifesciences (United States)
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Joseph M. Massaro
Joseph M. Massaro Boston University
Richard W. Smalling
Richard W. Smalling The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Laura Mauri
Laura Mauri University of Milan

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring careers linked to Medicine in the USA goes beyond traditional MD programs. Many students look for flexible education options, especially when balancing work, family, or personal commitments. Several reputable online pmhnp programs (Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner) allow registered nurses to specialize in mental health care while continuing to work.

Healthcare administration is another dynamic field with high demand for skilled professionals. Earning a bachelors in health administration equips you for roles in hospital management, policy, and operations. For those seeking advanced leadership positions, comparing the cost of mha degree (Master of Healthcare Administration) programs is essential for making an informed decision.

Many nursing professionals consider advancing their clinical expertise by pursuing the cheapest online bsn to dnp programs. These programs provide a direct path from bachelor's to doctorate level in nursing, combining affordability with the flexibility of online study. Exploring related online degrees broadens your career options and aligns your education with the growing needs of the healthcare industry.

Best Scientists Citing Saibal Kar

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles