World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tiinamaija Tuomi

Tiinamaija Tuomi

Award Badge
Best Female Scientists
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Best Female Scientists

D-Index
116
Citations
80657
World Ranking
661
National Ranking
9

Medicine

D-Index
119
Citations
83280
World Ranking
3806
National Ranking
44

Tiinamaija Tuomi publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiinamaija Tuomi sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 391 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Tiinamaija Tuomi D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiinamaija Tuomi sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 119 D-Index — 81st percentile

81% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Best Female Scientists Award

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Gene

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Type 2 diabetes, Diabetes mellitus and Genetics. Insulin and Risk factor are the core of his Internal medicine study. His studies in Endocrinology integrate themes in fields like Glutamate decarboxylase, Melatonin receptor 1B and Candidate gene.

His research in Type 2 diabetes intersects with topics in Odds ratio, CDKAL1, TCF7L2, Insulin resistance and SLC30A8. The concepts of his Diabetes mellitus study are interwoven with issues in Disease and Triglyceride. His study looks at the relationship between Genetics and topics such as Glucose homeostasis, which overlap with Insulin processing, Proinsulin and Quantitative trait locus.

His most cited work include:

  • Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome (4071 citations)
  • Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels (2462 citations)
  • Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index (2348 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Tiinamaija Tuomi mainly focuses on Internal medicine, Type 2 diabetes, Endocrinology, Diabetes mellitus and Genetics. His work in Internal medicine addresses issues such as Type 1 diabetes, which are connected to fields such as Human leukocyte antigen. His Type 2 diabetes study also includes

  • TCF7L2 that connect with fields like CDKAL1,
  • Body mass index that intertwine with fields like Obesity.

His study in Endocrinology is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Glutamate decarboxylase and Prospective cohort study. His Diabetes mellitus study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Gastroenterology and Family history. His Genome-wide association study research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Bioinformatics, Allele, Locus, Glucose homeostasis and Genetic architecture.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Internal medicine (72.75%)
  • Type 2 diabetes (58.26%)
  • Endocrinology (56.23%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • Type 2 diabetes (58.26%)
  • Internal medicine (72.75%)
  • Diabetes mellitus (53.62%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary areas of investigation include Type 2 diabetes, Internal medicine, Diabetes mellitus, Endocrinology and Genome-wide association study. His study on Type 2 diabetes also encompasses disciplines like

  • Body mass index which is related to area like Risk factor,
  • Logistic regression which is related to area like Proportional hazards model and Continuous glucose monitoring. His Internal medicine research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Gastroenterology and SLC30A8.

His Diabetes mellitus study combines topics in areas such as TCF7L2, Case-control study, Genetic predisposition and Cohort. His work focuses on many connections between Endocrinology and other disciplines, such as Prospective cohort study, that overlap with his field of interest in Predictive value of tests. His Genome-wide association study research is included under the broader classification of Genetics.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables (585 citations)
  • Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables (585 citations)
  • Refining the accuracy of validated target identification through coding variant fine-mapping in type 2 diabetes (165 citations)

Best Publications

  • Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality Associated With the Metabolic Syndrome

    Bo Isomaa;Peter Almgren;Tiinamaija Tuomi;Björn Forsén

  • Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index

    Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Cristen J. Willer;Sonja I. Berndt;Keri L. Monda

  • Genome-Wide Association Analysis Identifies Loci for Type 2 Diabetes and Triglyceride Levels

    Richa Saxena;Benjamin F. Voight;Valeriya Lyssenko;Noël P. Burtt

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk

    Josée Dupuis;Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena;Richa Saxena

  • The common PPARgamma Pro12Ala polymorphism is associated with decreased risk of type 2 diabetes.

    David Altshuler;Joel N. Hirschhorn;Joel N. Hirschhorn;Joel N. Hirschhorn;Mia Klannemark;Cecilia M. Lindgren;Cecilia M. Lindgren

  • Meta-analysis of genome-wide association data and large-scale replication identifies additional susceptibility loci for type 2 diabetes

    E Zeggini;L J Scott;R Saxena;B F Voight

  • New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (vol 42, pg 105, 2010)

    J Dupuis;C Langenberg;I Prokopenko;R Saxena

  • Twelve type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci identified through large-scale association analysis

    Benjamin F. Voight;Benjamin F. Voight;Laura J. Scott;Valgerdur Steinthorsdottir;Andrew P. Morris

  • Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes

    Andrew P Morris;Benjamin F Voight;Benjamin F Voight;Tanya M Teslovich;Teresa Ferreira

  • Six new loci associated with body mass index highlight a neuronal influence on body weight regulation

    Cristen J. Willer;Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Elizabeth K. Speliotes;Ruth J. F. Loos;Shengxu Li

  • Novel subgroups of adult-onset diabetes and their association with outcomes: a data-driven cluster analysis of six variables

    Emma Ahlqvist;Petter Storm;Annemari Käräjämäki;Mats Martinell

  • A genome-wide association search for type 2 diabetes genes in African Americans.

    N D Palmer;C W McDonough;P J Hicks;B H Roh

  • The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes

    Christian Fuchsberger;Christian Fuchsberger;Jason A. Flannick;Jason A. Flannick;Tanya M. Teslovich;Anubha Mahajan

  • Association analyses of 249,796 individuals reveal 18 new loci associated with body mass index

    E. K. Speliotes;C. J. Willer;S. I. Berndt;K. L. Monda

  • Clinical risk factors, DNA variants, and the development of type 2 diabetes.

    Valeriya Lyssenko;Anna Jonsson;Peter Almgren;Nicoló Pulizzi

  • Meta-analysis identifies 13 new loci associated with waist-hip ratio and reveals sexual dimorphism in the genetic basis of fat distribution

    Iris M. Heid;Anne U. Jackson;Joshua C. Randall;Tthomas W. Winkler

  • Mechanisms by which common variants in the TCF7L2 gene increase risk of type 2 diabetes

    Valeriya Lyssenko;Roberto Lupi;Piero Marchetti;Silvia Del Guerra

  • Genome-wide trans-ancestry meta-analysis provides insight into the genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes susceptibility.

    Anubha Mahajan;Min Jin Go;Weihua Zhang;Jennifer E. Below

  • Erratum: New genetic loci implicated in fasting glucose homeostasis and their impact on type 2 diabetes risk (Nature Genetics (2010) 42 (105-116))

    Josée Dupuis;Claudia Langenberg;Inga Prokopenko;Richa Saxena

  • The genetic architecture of type 2 diabetes

    Christian Fuchsberger;Jason Flannick;Tanya M. Teslovich;Anubha Mahajan

Frequent Co-Authors

Leif Groop
Leif Groop Lund University
Valeriya Lyssenko
Valeriya Lyssenko University of Bergen
David Altshuler
David Altshuler Harvard University
Jose C. Florez
Jose C. Florez Harvard University
Cecilia M. Lindgren
Cecilia M. Lindgren University of Oxford
Philippe Froguel
Philippe Froguel Imperial College London
Torben Hansen
Torben Hansen University of Copenhagen
Oluf Pedersen
Oluf Pedersen University of Copenhagen
Jaakko Tuomilehto
Jaakko Tuomilehto University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring medical professionals have more online education options than ever before. If you are interested in nutrition, a bachelor's in nutrition online can help you build a foundation in health sciences and open doors to various healthcare careers, wellness coaching, or further medical study.

For those pursuing leadership roles in healthcare, consider one of the best online mha programs that are CAHME-accredited. These programs are designed for working professionals and emphasize management, policy, and administration in medical settings.

Registered Nurses seeking career advancement may complete bridge programs. If you wonder, does rn to bsn require clinicals, some online RN to BSN tracks offer minimal or no clinical hours, making it easier to fit studies into a busy schedule.

Nurses interested in the highest level of clinical practice should explore dnp programs online. These doctorates can often be completed faster through flexible, online formats, preparing graduates for advanced patient care, leadership, and educational roles.

Best Scientists Citing Tiinamaija Tuomi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles