World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
92
Citations
37576
World Ranking
11160
National Ranking
5740

Robert J. Siegel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 664 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert J. Siegel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert J. Siegel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2015 - Distinguished Teacher Award, American College of Cardiology (ACC)
  • 1996 - Max Jakob Memorial Award

Overview

Robert J. Siegel is affiliated with Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, focusing primarily on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their body of work includes 299 publications, with a significant emphasis on cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, reflecting 180 publications in this subfield.

The scientist's research interests encompass several interrelated areas, notably:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Imaging and Diagnostics
  • Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Siegel has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Florian Rader
  • Tarun Chakravarty
  • Raj Makkar
  • Takahiro Shiota
  • Moody Makar

Their research has appeared in various high-impact journals, with multiple papers published in venues such as:

  • Journal of the American College of Cardiology
  • Circulation
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • JACC. Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Echocardiography

Some of the recent papers by Robert J. Siegel include:

  • Right-Sided Infective Endocarditis 2020: Challenges and Updates in Diagnosis and Treatment, 2020, Journal of the American Heart Association
  • Blinded, randomized trial of sonographer versus AI cardiac function assessment, 2023, Nature
  • Recommendations for the Use of Echocardiography in the Evaluation of Rheumatic Heart Disease: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography, 2022, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography
  • Artificial Intelligence Trumps TAVI2-SCORE and CoreValve Score in Predicting 1-Year Mortality Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement, 2020, Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
  • Prognostic Value of Increased Mitral Valve Gradient After Transcatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Primary Mitral Regurgitation, 2022, JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions

Over the course of their career, Siegel has been recognized with awards such as the Distinguished Teacher Award from the American College of Cardiology in 2015 and the Max Jakob Memorial Award in 1996.

Best Publications

  • American College of Cardiology Clinical Expert Consensus Document on Standards for Acquisition, Measurement and Reporting of Intravascular Ultrasound Studies (IVUS). A report of the American College of Cardiology Task Force on Clinical Expert Consensus Documents.

    Gary S Mintz;Steven E Nissen;William D Anderson;Steven R Bailey

  • Percutaneous Repair or Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation

    Ted Feldman;Elyse Foster;Donald G. Glower;Saibal Kar

  • Transcatheter Aortic-Valve Replacement for Inoperable Severe Aortic Stenosis

    Raj R Makkar;Gregory P Fontana;Hasan Jilaihawi;Samir Kapadia

  • Pembrolizumab versus paclitaxel for previously treated, advanced gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction cancer (KEYNOTE-061): a randomised, open-label, controlled, phase 3 trial

    Kohei Shitara;Mustafa Özgüroğlu;Yung-Jue Bang;Maria Di Bartolomeo

  • Subclinical leaflet thrombosis in surgical and transcatheter bioprosthetic aortic valves: an observational study

    Tarun Chakravarty;Lars Søndergaard;John Friedman;Ole De Backer

  • Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Repair and Surgery for Mitral Regurgitation 5-Year Results of EVEREST II

    Ted Feldman;Saibal Kar;Sammy Elmariah;Steven C. Smart

  • Acute and 12-Month Results With Catheter-Based Mitral Valve Leaflet Repair: The EVEREST II (Endovascular Valve Edge-to-Edge Repair) High Risk Study

    Patrick L. Whitlow;Ted Feldman;Wes R. Pedersen;D. Scott Lim

  • Idiopathic dilated Cardiomyopathy: Analysis of 152 necropsy patients

    William C. Roberts;Robert J. Siegel;Bruce M. McManus

  • Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography.

    Kirk T. Spencer;Bruce J. Kimura;Claudia E. Korcarz;Patricia A. Pellikka

  • Cardiovascular manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus.

    Neil E. Doherty;Robert J. Siegel

  • Ventricular Septal Rupture after Acute Myocardial Infarction

    Yochai Birnbaum;Michael C Fishbein;Carlos Blanche;Robert J Siegel

  • The Left Atrial Appendage: Anatomy, Function, and Noninvasive Evaluation

    Roy Beigel;Nina C. Wunderlich;Siew Yen Ho;Reza Arsanjani

  • Ultrasound catheter having integrated drug delivery system and methods of using same

    Henry Nita;Timothy Mills;Robert Siegel

  • Origin of the right coronary artery from the left sinus of Valsalva and its functional consequences: Analysis of 10 necropsy patients

    William C. Roberts;Robert J. Siegel;Douglas P. Zipes

  • Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination.

    Sergio L. Kobal;Luca Trento;Simin Baharami;Kirsten Tolstrup

  • Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis: A review

    J A Lopez;R S Ross;M C Fishbein;R J Siegel

  • Guidelines for the Evaluation of Valvular Regurgitation After Percutaneous Valve Repair or Replacement: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography Developed in Collaboration with the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, Japanese Society of Echocardiography, and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

    William A. Zoghbi;Federico M. Asch;Charles Bruce;Linda D. Gillam

  • Contribution of inadequate compensatory enlargement to development of human coronary artery stenosis: an in vivo intravascular ultrasound study.

    Toshihiko Nishioka;Huai Luo;Neal L. Eigler;Hans Berglund

  • Alterations of phasic coronary artery flow velocity humans during percutaneous coronary angioplasty

    Jerome Segal;Morton J. Kern;Neal A. Scott;Spencer B. King

  • Accuracy of right ventricular volumes and function determined by three-dimensional echocardiography in comparison with magnetic resonance imaging: a meta-analysis study.

    Yuichi J. Shimada;Maiko Shiota;Robert J. Siegel;Takahiro Shiota

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Fishbein
Michael C. Fishbein University of California, Los Angeles
Raj Makkar
Raj Makkar Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Gerald Maurer
Gerald Maurer Medical University of Vienna
Daniel S. Berman
Daniel S. Berman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
John D. Friedman
John D. Friedman Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Peter M. Schlag
Peter M. Schlag Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Martin B. Leon
Martin B. Leon Columbia University Medical Center
Jonathan W. Said
Jonathan W. Said University of California, Los Angeles
Donald D. Glower
Donald D. Glower Duke University
Pamela S. Douglas
Pamela S. Douglas Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare can lead to rewarding careers beyond a traditional MD. Many aspiring professionals are choosing flexible study options, with online nursing degrees standing out for their accessibility and relevance.

Those already holding an RN license might consider advancing their education with cheap rn to bsn programs to unlock broader career opportunities and higher salaries. Meanwhile, for individuals aiming to enter advanced practice or leadership roles in nursing, phd nursing programs online offer rigorous yet flexible doctoral-level study.

Non-nurses who hold a bachelor's degree may fast-track their nursing career with direct entry msn programs online. These programs are designed for those looking to pivot into nursing without having to repeat undergraduate coursework.

If you are searching for more accessible options, easiest nursing programs to get into can be a good starting point, helping you begin your journey in healthcare sooner and with fewer barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Robert J. Siegel

Trending Scientists