World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 96 9733 9135 55 51 570 31570

Gerald Maurer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Gerald Maurer between 1981 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Gerald Maurer published across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025, averaging 13.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2013. 9 of the 589 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2013. 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 12 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 1 publication 1987: 5 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 5 publications 1990: 8 publications 1991: 6 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 10 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 14 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 22 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 14 publications 2003: 23 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 25 publications 2006: 28 publications 2007: 22 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 23 publications 2012: 21 publications 2013: 47 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 29 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 4 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 6 publications 2025: 3 publications
1981 2025

589 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Gerald Maurer: publications per year, 1981 to 2025
Year Publications
1981 1
1982 2
1983 1
1984 12
1985 1
1986 1
1987 5
1988 4
1989 5
1990 8
1991 6
1992 8
1993 3
1994 5
1995 7
1996 10
1997 17
1998 14
1999 12
2000 22
2001 7
2002 14
2003 23
2004 24
2005 25
2006 28
2007 22
2008 9
2009 16
2010 28
2011 23
2012 21
2013 47
2014 41
2015 29
2016 27
2017 19
2018 9
2019 7
2020 4
2021 4
2022 2
2023 7
2024 6
2025 3
Total 589
Download as CSV

Gerald Maurer publications per year - data summary

  • Gerald Maurer, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, has 589 publications recorded across 45 years, from 1981 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1981 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 47 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1981, 1983, 1985 and 1986, with 1 publication each.
  • The rate of publication averages 13.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 13.1 per year counting only the 45 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 22 publications, 4% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1981-1995: 69 publications (4.6 per year); 1996-2010: 271 publications (18.1 per year); 2011-2025: 249 publications (16.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Gerald Maurer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Maurer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 561–580 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 570 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504 570
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Gerald Maurer publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Gerald Maurer, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, records 570 publications - the 68th percentile of the discipline.
  • 68% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gerald Maurer, and about 32% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Gerald Maurer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Gerald Maurer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gerald Maurer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 96–97 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779 96
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Gerald Maurer D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Gerald Maurer, a Medicine scholar from Medical University of Vienna, records 96 D-Index - the 53rd percentile of the discipline.
  • 53% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Gerald Maurer, and about 47% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Gerald Maurer ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Gerald Maurer is affiliated with the Medical University of Vienna in Austria. Their research encompasses a broad spectrum of medicine, focusing particularly on cardiology, cardiovascular medicine, radiology, nuclear medicine and imaging, infectious diseases, public health, and biomedical engineering. The scientist has contributed extensively to topics such as cardiac imaging and diagnostics, cardiovascular function and risk factors, cardiovascular effects of exercise, mosquito-borne diseases and control, viral infections and vectors, cardiomyopathy and myosin studies, and advanced X-ray and CT imaging.

Their recent publications include:

  • COVID-19 pandemic and cardiac imaging: EACVI recommendations on precautions, indications, prioritization, and protection for patients and healthcare personnel, 2020, European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Vulnerable or High-Risk Plaque, 2025, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Safety and immunogenicity against ancestral, Delta and Omicron virus variants following a booster dose of an inactivated whole-virus COVID-19 vaccine (VLA2001): Interim analysis of an open-label extension of the randomized, controlled, phase 3 COV-COMPARE trial, 2023, Journal of Infection
  • Pooled safety evaluation for a new single-shot live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine, 2024, Journal of Travel Medicine
  • Combined immunogenicity evaluation for a new single-dose live-attenuated chikungunya vaccine, 2024, Journal of Travel Medicine

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors including Bernard Cosyns, Thor Edvardsen, Alessia Gimelli, Bogdan A. Popescu, and Susanne Eder-Lingelbach.

Key venues for their publications are:

  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging
  • Journal of Travel Medicine
  • ARQUIVOS BRASILEIROS DE CARDIOLOGIA - IMAGEM CARDIOVASCULAR
  • JACC. Cardiovascular imaging
  • Journal of Infection

Their work primarily contributes to cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, with a significant focus on cardiac imaging and cardiovascular diagnostics. They also address implications related to infectious diseases, particularly mosquito-borne illnesses and vaccine safety.

Best Publications

  • Predictors of outcome in severe, asymptomatic aortic stenosis.

    Raphael Rosenhek;Thomas Binder;Gerold Porenta;Irene Lang

  • Myocardial Viability and Survival in Ischemic Left Ventricular Dysfunction

    Robert O. Bonow;Gerald Maurer;Kerry L. Lee;Thomas A. Holly

  • Late prognostic value of flow-mediated dilation in the brachial artery of patients with chest pain.

    Thomas Neunteufl;Sandra Heher;Reinhold Katzenschlager;Gabriele Wölfl

  • Natural History of Very Severe Aortic Stenosis

    Raphael Rosenhek;Robert Zilberszac;Michael Schemper;Martin Czerny

  • Outcome of Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Severe Mitral Regurgitation

    Raphael Rosenhek;Florian Rader;Ursula Klaar;Harald Gabriel

  • Natriuretic Peptides Predict Symptom-Free Survival and Postoperative Outcome in Severe Aortic Stenosis

    Jutta Bergler-Klein;Ursula Klaar;Maria Heger;Raphael Rosenhek

  • Mild and moderate aortic stenosis. Natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography.

    Raphael Rosenhek;Ursula Klaar;Michael Schemper;Christine Scholten

  • Statins but not angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors delay progression of aortic stenosis

    Raphael Rosenhek;Florian Rader;Nicole Loho;Harald Gabriel

  • Implementation of Guidelines Improves the Standard of Care The Viennese Registry on Reperfusion Strategies in ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction (Vienna STEMI Registry)

    Karim Kalla;Günter Christ;Ronald Karnik;Reinhard Malzer

  • PexeLizumab for Acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction in patients undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention: A randomized controlled trial

    Paul W. Armstrong;N. Bett;D. Brieger;D. Chew

  • Diastolic Pulmonary Vascular Pressure Gradient: A Predictor of Prognosis in “Out-of-Proportion” Pulmonary Hypertension

    Christian Gerges;Mario Gerges;Marie B. Lang;Yuhui Zhang

  • Mechanisms Underlying Aortic Dilatation in Congenital Aortic Valve Malformation

    Diana Bonderman;Elisabeth Gharehbaghi-Schnell;Gregor Wollenek;Gerald Maurer

  • Two-dimensional contrast echocardiography. I. In vitro development and quantitative analysis of echo contrast agents

    Steven B. Feinstein;Folkert J. Ten Cate;Werner Zwehl;Kenneth Ong

  • Gated technetium-99m sestamibi for simultaneous assessment of stress myocardial perfusion, postexercise regional ventricular function and myocardial viability. Correlation with echocardiography and rest thallium-201 scintigraphy.

    Terrance Chua;Hosen Kiat;Guido Germano;Gerald Maurer

  • “overestimation” of catheter gradients by doppler ultrasound in patients with aortic stenosis: a predictable manifestation of pressure recovery

    Helmut Baumgartner;Thomas Stefenelli;Julia Niederberger;Heinrich Schima

  • Inflammation and Carotid Artery—Risk for Atherosclerosis Study (ICARAS)

    Martin Schillinger;Markus Exner;Wolfgang Mlekusch;Schila Sabeti

  • Meta-Analysis of Cell-based CaRdiac stUdiEs (ACCRUE) in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Based on Individual Patient Data

    Mariann Gyöngyösi;Wojciech Wojakowski;Patricia Lemarchand;Ketil Lunde

  • Medical conditions increasing the risk of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.

    Diana Bonderman;Johannes Jakowitsch;Christopher Adlbrecht;Michael Schemper

  • Contribution of nicotine to acute endothelial dysfunction in long-term smokers.

    Thomas Neunteufl;Sandra Heher;Karam Kostner;Goran Mitulovic

  • 780 Mild and moderate aortic stenosis: natural history and risk stratification by echocardiography

    R. Rosenhek;U. Klaar;C. Scholten;M. Heger

Frequent Co-Authors

Kurt Huber
Kurt Huber Sigmund Freud University Vienna
Irene M. Lang
Irene M. Lang Medical University of Vienna
Helmut Baumgartner
Helmut Baumgartner University Hospital of Münster
Patrizio Lancellotti
Patrizio Lancellotti University of Liège
Thor Edvardsen
Thor Edvardsen Oslo University Hospital
Robert J. Siegel
Robert J. Siegel Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
Bogdan A. Popescu
Bogdan A. Popescu Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy
Oswald Wagner
Oswald Wagner Medical University of Vienna
Gilbert Habib
Gilbert Habib Aix-Marseille University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medicine, there are multiple flexible online pathways beyond traditional medical school. Nursing is a popular choice, with options for licensed RNs to advance their qualifications. rn to bsn programs are ideal for nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional clinicals, offering a streamlined route to career advancement.

If you already hold a master’s degree in nursing, you may consider the fastest msn to dnp program options available online, allowing you to earn a terminal doctorate quickly. Cost is also a key concern—exploring the cheapest dnp program can help minimize debt while maximizing your credentials.

Those at the start of their nursing careers may be drawn to fast track lpn programs online. These accelerated courses offer a fast entry into practical nursing, often with flexible study from home. With online programs catering to many stages of your medical career, there’s a pathway for nearly every goal.

Best Scientists Citing Gerald Maurer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles