World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Cassidy R. Sugimoto

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
58
Citations
15441
World Ranking
1637
National Ranking
780

Computer Science

D-Index
53
Citations
14208
World Ranking
4741
National Ranking
2207

Cassidy R. Sugimoto publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cassidy R. Sugimoto sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 238 publications — 76th percentile

76% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Cassidy R. Sugimoto D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Cassidy R. Sugimoto sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Cassidy R. Sugimoto is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Decision Sciences, with 32 published works in this field. Their subfields include Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty; Sociology and Political Science; Information Systems and Management; Economics and Econometrics; and Information Systems.

The main topics covered in Sugimoto's research are diverse and encompass scientometrics and bibliometrics research, Academic Publishing and Open Access, Misinformation and Its Impacts, Diversity and Career in Medicine, Pharmaceutical Industry and Healthcare, Health and Medical Research Impacts, and Economic and Technological Innovation.

Recent papers by Cassidy R. Sugimoto include:

  • Intersectional inequalities in science, 2022, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • The gendered nature of authorship, 2021, Science Advances
  • Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT), 2020, Quantitative Science Studies
  • The future of human behaviour research, 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty, 2020, PLoS ONE

Sugimoto has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including Vincent Larivière, Thema Monroe-White, Dakota Murray, Nicolás Robinson-García, and Diego Kozlowski. The number of collaborations ranges from 7 to 53 for these co-authors.

Their work has been published in multiple venues, with recurring appearances in Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), Quantitative Science Studies, Scientometrics, and PLoS ONE.

Cassidy R. Sugimoto has contributed to book publications as well. These include titles published by The MIT Press and Harvard University Press:

  • Open Knowledge Institutions, The MIT Press, 2021
  • Equity for Women in Science, Harvard University Press, 2023

Best Publications

  • Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science

    Vincent Larivière;Chaoqun Ni;Yves Gingras;Blaise Cronin

  • Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services

    Mike Thelwall;Stefanie Haustein;Vincent Larivière;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • Bias in peer review

    Carole J. Lee;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Guo Zhang;Blaise Cronin

  • Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Sam Work;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Stefanie Haustein

  • Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature

    Stefanie Haustein;Isabella Peters;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Mike Thelwall

  • Mapping world scientific collaboration: Authors, institutions, and countries

    Ali Gazni;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Fereshteh Didegah

  • Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900

    Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Yves Gingras;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Andrew Tsou

  • Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review

    Hamid Ekbia;Michael Mattioli;Inna Kouper;G. Arave

  • Intersectional inequalities in science

    Unknown

  • Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Yong Yeol Ahn;Elise Smith;Benoit Macaluso

  • Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated bot accounts on Twitter

    Stefanie Haustein;Timothy D. Bowman;Kim Holmberg;Andrew Tsou

  • Contributorship and division of labor in knowledge production.

    Vincent Larivière;Nadine Desrochers;Benoît Macaluso;Philippe Mongeon

  • The cognitive structure of Library and Information Science: Analysis of article title words

    Staša Milojević;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Erjia Yan;Ying Ding

  • A bibliometric chronicling of library and information science's first hundred years

    Vincent Larivière;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Blaise Cronin

  • Scientists have most impact when they’re free to move

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Nicolas Robinson-Garcia;Dakota S. Murray;Alfredo Yegros-Yegros

  • Beyond bibliometrics : harnessing multidimensional indicators of scholarly impact

    Blaise Cronin;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • A systematic identification and analysis of scientists on Twitter.

    Qing Ke;Yong-Yeol Ahn;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • Scientists popularizing science: Characteristics and impact of TED Talk presenters

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Mike Thelwall;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Andrew Tsou

  • The Journal Impact Factor: A Brief History, Critique, and Discussion of Adverse Effects

    Vincent Larivière;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • The shifting sands of disciplinary development: Analyzing North American Library and Information Science dissertations using latent Dirichlet allocation

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Daifeng Li;Terrell G. Russell;S. Craig Finlay

  • Is Science Built on the Shoulders of Women? A Study of Gender Differences in Contributorship

    Benoit Macaluso;Vincent Larivière;Thomas Sugimoto;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • Author-Reviewer Homophily in Peer Review

    Dakota Murray;Kyle Siler;Vincent Larivière;Wei Mun Chan

Frequent Co-Authors

Vincent Larivière
Vincent Larivière University of Montreal
Blaise Cronin
Blaise Cronin Indiana University
Rodrigo Costas
Rodrigo Costas Leiden University
Ying Ding
Ying Ding The University of Texas at Austin
Mike Thelwall
Mike Thelwall University of Sheffield
Erjia Yan
Erjia Yan Drexel University
Yong-Yeol Ahn
Yong-Yeol Ahn Indiana University
Ludo Waltman
Ludo Waltman Leiden University
Yves Gingras
Yves Gingras University of Quebec at Montreal
Judit Bar-Ilan
Judit Bar-Ilan Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The popularity of online social sciences and humanities programs in the USA is rising, making education more accessible and flexible. Students often seek specialized degrees that lead to meaningful roles in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. When considering your options, affordability, accreditation, admission requirements, and career opportunities are essential factors.

For those interested in counseling, enrolling in cacrep schools ensures your online counseling degree meets the highest industry standards. Individuals aiming to become licensed marriage and family therapists can explore marriage and family therapy certification online for practical, recognized options.

If psychology is your focus, finding an affordable online psychology degree can help you start or advance your career without excessive debt. For those pursuing social work, there are now several choices for the easiest msw program to get into, ideal for students who prefer a streamlined admission process.

Exploring these pathways can open doors to diverse and rewarding careers across social sciences and humanities, adapting to both your academic interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Cassidy R. Sugimoto

Trending Scientists