World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Vincent Larivière

Vincent Larivière

Award Badge
Computer Science
Canada
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 77 454 390 27 25 388 26574
Computer Science 69 1945 1883 70 64 245 23621

Vincent Larivière publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Vincent Larivière between 1999 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Vincent Larivière published across 27 years, from 1999 to 2025, averaging 19.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 41 publications in 2014. 54 of the 538 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 41. Peak 41 publications in 2014. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 10 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 16 publications 2013: 30 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 40 publications 2016: 39 publications 2017: 26 publications 2018: 39 publications 2019: 33 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 29 publications 2022: 41 publications 2023: 33 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 27 publications
1999 2025

538 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Vincent Larivière: publications per year, 1999 to 2025
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 3
2001 1
2002 2
2003 0
2004 5
2005 10
2006 11
2007 5
2008 15
2009 16
2010 13
2011 8
2012 16
2013 30
2014 41
2015 40
2016 39
2017 26
2018 39
2019 33
2020 27
2021 29
2022 41
2023 33
2024 27
2025 27
Total 538
Download as CSV

Vincent Larivière publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Larivière sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 384–393 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 388 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44 388
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Vincent Larivière D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Vincent Larivière sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30 77
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in Canada Leader Award

Overview

Vincent Larivière is affiliated with the University of Montreal in Canada, focusing primarily on Decision Sciences. Their research spans several subfields, including Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Sociology and Political Science, Information Systems and Management, Artificial Intelligence, and Economics and Econometrics.

The main topics explored by Larivière include scientometrics and bibliometrics research, academic publishing and open access, research data management practices, academic writing and publishing, topic modeling, climate change communication and perception, and gender diversity and inequality.

Recent publications illustrate the diversity of Larivière's research interests. Selected papers include:

  • "Intersectional inequalities in science" (2022), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Improving Reproducibility in Machine Learning Research (A Report from the NeurIPS 2019 Reproducibility Program)" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "The gendered nature of authorship" (2021), published in Science Advances
  • "Investigating the division of scientific labor using the Contributor Roles Taxonomy (CRediT)" (2020), published in Quantitative Science Studies
  • "Exploring the personal and professional factors associated with student evaluations of tenure-track faculty" (2020), published in PLoS ONE

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Larivière include:

  • Cassidy R. Sugimoto
  • Diego Kozlowski
  • Marc-André Simard
  • Philippe Mongeon
  • Natsumi S. Shokida

Larivière publishes regularly in several venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Scientometrics
  • Quantitative Science Studies
  • PLoS ONE

Additionally, Larivière has contributed to book publications, including:

  • "Equity for Women in Science" (2023), published by Harvard University Press

Best Publications

  • Bibliometrics: Global gender disparities in science

    Vincent Larivière;Chaoqun Ni;Yves Gingras;Blaise Cronin

  • The Oligopoly of Academic Publishers in the Digital Era

    Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Stefanie Haustein;Philippe Mongeon

  • The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles

    Heather Piwowar;Jason Priem;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Juan Pablo Alperin;Juan Pablo Alperin

  • Do Altmetrics Work? Twitter and Ten Other Social Web Services

    Mike Thelwall;Stefanie Haustein;Vincent Larivière;Cassidy R. Sugimoto

  • Self-Selected or Mandated, Open Access Increases Citation Impact for Higher Quality Research

    Yassine Gargouri;Chawki Hajjem;Vincent Larivière;Yves Gingras

  • Scholarly use of social media and altmetrics: A review of the literature

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Sam Work;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Stefanie Haustein

  • Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases

    Éric Archambault;Étienne Vignola-Gagné;Grégoire Côté;Vincent Larivière

  • Tweeting biomedicine: An analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature

    Stefanie Haustein;Isabella Peters;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Mike Thelwall

  • Comparing Bibliometric Statistics Obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus

    Eric Archambault;David Campbell;Yves Gingras;Vincent Lariviere

  • Team size matters: Collaboration and scientific impact since 1900

    Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière;Yves Gingras;Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Andrew Tsou

  • Comparing bibliometric statistics obtained from the Web of Science and Scopus

    Éric Archambault;David Campbell;Yves Gingras;Vincent Larivière

  • History of the journal impact factor: contingencies and consequences

    Éric Archambault;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière

  • Characterizing social media metrics of scholarly papers: the effect of document properties and collaboration patterns

    Stefanie Haustein;Rodrigo Costas;Vincent Larivière

  • The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities

    Vincent Larivière;Éric Archambault;Yves Gingras;Étienne Vignola-Gagné

  • Intersectional inequalities in science

    Unknown

  • The weakening relationship between the impact factor and papers' citations in the digital age

    George A. Lozano;Vincent Larivière;Yves Gingras

  • Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities

    Vincent Larivière;Yves Gingras;Éric Archambault

  • The Use of Bibliometrics for Assessing Research: Possibilities, Limitations and Adverse Effects

    Stefanie Haustein;Vincent Larivière

  • Misconduct Policies, Academic Culture and Career Stage, Not Gender or Pressures to Publish, Affect Scientific Integrity.

    Daniele Fanelli;Rodrigo Costas;Vincent Larivière

  • Factors affecting sex-related reporting in medical research: a cross-disciplinary bibliometric analysis.

    Cassidy R. Sugimoto;Yong Yeol Ahn;Elise Smith;Benoit Macaluso

  • Tweets as impact indicators: Examining the implications of automated bot accounts on Twitter

    Stefanie Haustein;Timothy D. Bowman;Kim Holmberg;Andrew Tsou

  • The Effects of Aging on Researchers' Publication and Citation Patterns

    Yves Gingras;Vincent Larivière;Benoît Macaluso;Jean-Pierre Robitaille

  • Who reads research articles? An altmetrics analysis of Mendeley user categories

    Ehsan Mohammadi;Mike Thelwall;Stefanie Haustein;Vincent Larivière;Vincent Larivière

Frequent Co-Authors

Cassidy R. Sugimoto
Cassidy R. Sugimoto Indiana University
Yves Gingras
Yves Gingras University of Quebec at Montreal
Rodrigo Costas
Rodrigo Costas Leiden University
Mike Thelwall
Mike Thelwall University of Sheffield
Stevan Harnad
Stevan Harnad University of Quebec at Montreal
Blaise Cronin
Blaise Cronin Indiana University
Ying Ding
Ying Ding The University of Texas at Austin
Ludo Waltman
Ludo Waltman Leiden University
Katy Börner
Katy Börner Indiana University
David B. Resnik
David B. Resnik National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering advancing your education in the Social Sciences and Humanities, a range of online programs can open doors to fulfilling careers. Popular options include counseling, psychology, social work, and marriage and family therapy, each offering unique pathways and specializations.

Fully online cacrep accredited programs online equip students for licensure in counseling roles, blending affordability with rigorous standards. Future therapists may explore marriage and family masters programs, which focus on helping individuals, couples, and families thrive.

For those interested in the science of behavior and mental processes, an online psychology degree can lead to careers in counseling, research, education, and organizational development. Alternatively, programs highlighted among msw schools prepare graduates to become licensed social workers, advocates, or community leaders.

Each of these online degree options offers flexibility, diverse career opportunities, and the ability to make a meaningful impact in society while studying at your own pace.

Best Scientists Citing Vincent Larivière

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles