World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
55
Citations
11471
World Ranking
4695
National Ranking
16

James W. Sleigh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Sleigh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 348 publications — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

James W. Sleigh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where James W. Sleigh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

James W. Sleigh is affiliated with the University of Auckland in New Zealand. Their research primarily focuses on medicine and neuroscience, with a significant interest in anesthesiology and pain medicine. The scientist's work spans several subfields, including cognitive neuroscience, pharmacology, cellular and molecular neuroscience, and radiology, nuclear medicine, and imaging.

The main topics covered in their research include anesthesia and sedative agents, treatment of major depression, neuroscience and neuropharmacology research, EEG and brain-computer interfaces, optical imaging and spectroscopy techniques, anesthesia and neurotoxicity research, and intensive care unit cognitive disorders.

The scientist has published research in a variety of journals, with frequent publications in:

  • Anesthesiology
  • British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Molecules
  • NeuroImage
  • Frontiers in Pain Research

Recent papers authored by James W. Sleigh include:

  • Spectral and Entropic Features Are Altered by Age in the Electroencephalogram in Patients under Sevoflurane Anesthesia (2020, Anesthesiology)
  • Effects of Noxious Stimulation on the Electroencephalogram during General Anaesthesia: A Narrative Review and Approach to Analgesic Titration (2021, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • Structure-Activity Relationships for the Anaesthetic and Analgaesic Properties of Aromatic Ring-Substituted Ketamine Esters (2020, Molecules)
  • Analysis of the Hindriks and van Putten Model for Propofol Anesthesia: Limitations and Extensions (2020, NeuroImage)
  • Non-NMDA Mechanisms of Analgesia in Ketamine Analogs (2022, Frontiers in Pain Research)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with James W. Sleigh include:

  • Matthias Kreuzer
  • Darren Hight
  • Paul S. García
  • Martyn Harvey
  • Logan J. Voss

Best Publications

  • Unresponsiveness ≠ Unconsciousness

    Unknown

  • Permutation entropy of the electroencephalogram: a measure of anaesthetic drug effect

    E Olofsen;James Sleigh;A Dahan

  • EEG entropy measures in anesthesia

    Zhenhu Liang;Yinghua Wang;Xue Sun;Duan Li

  • The bispectral index: a measure of depth of sleep?

    James W. Sleigh;John Andrzejowski;D. Alistair Steyn-Ross;Moira L. Steyn-Ross

  • Psychosocial functioning during the year following severe traumatic brain injury

    Denyse A. Kersel;Nigel V. Marsh;Jack H. Havill;James W. Sleigh

  • The howling cortex: seizures and general anesthetic drugs.

    Logan J Voss;James W Sleigh;John P M Barnard;Heidi E Kirsch

  • The Bispectral Index

    James W. Sleigh;John Andrzejowski;Alistair Steyn-Ross;Moira Steyn-Ross

  • Theoretical electroencephalogram stationary spectrum for a white-noise-driven cortex: evidence for a general anesthetic-induced phase transition.

    Moira L. Steyn-Ross;D. A. Steyn-Ross;J. W. Sleigh;D. T. J. Liley

  • Caregiver burden during the year following severe traumatic brain injury.

    Nigel V. Marsh;Denyse A. Kersel;Jack H. Havill;James W. Sleigh

  • Association of electroencephalogram trajectories during emergence from anaesthesia with delirium in the postanaesthesia care unit: an early sign of postoperative complications.

    S. Hesse;S. Hesse;M. Kreuzer;M. Kreuzer;M. Kreuzer;D. Hight;A. Gaskell

  • Multiscale permutation entropy analysis of EEG recordings during sevoflurane anesthesia

    Duan Li;Xiaoli Li;Zhenhu Liang;Logan J Voss

  • Modelling general anaesthesia as a first-order phase transition in the cortex

    Moira L. Steyn-Ross;D.A. Steyn-Ross;J.W. Sleigh

  • Changes in airway configuration with different head and neck positions using magnetic resonance imaging of normal airways: a new concept with possible clinical applications

    Keith Greenland;Keith Greenland;Keith Greenland;Michael Edwards;N. Hutton;Vivien Challis

  • Analysis of depth of anesthesia with Hilbert-Huang spectral entropy.

    Xiaoli Li;Duan Li;Zhenhu Liang;Logan J. Voss

  • Cortical entropy changes with general anaesthesia: theory and experiment.

    J W Sleigh;D A Steyn-Ross;M L Steyn-Ross;C Grant

  • Comparison of changes in electroencephalographic measures during induction of general anaesthesia: influence of the gamma frequency band and electromyogram signal

    J.W. Sleigh;D.A. Steyn-Ross;M.L. Steyn-Ross;M.L. Williams

  • The use of polymerase chain reaction to detect septicemia in critically ill patients.

    Ray T. M. Cursons;Emmanuel Jeyerajah;James W. Sleigh

  • Incidence of Connected Consciousness after Tracheal Intubation A Prospective, International, Multicenter Cohort Study of the Isolated Forearm Technique

    Robert D. Sanders;Amy Gaskell;Aeyal Raz;Joel Winders

  • Changes in consciousness, conceptual memory, and quantitative electroencephalographical measures during recovery from sevoflurane- and remifentanil-based anesthesia.

    Andrew Ronald Gordon Muncaster;James Wallace Sleigh;Murray Williams

  • Does bispectral analysis of the electroencephalogram add anything but complexity

    A Miller;J.W. Sleigh;J Barnard;D.A. Steyn-Ross

  • Brain functional connectivity differentiates dexmedetomidine from propofol and natural sleep

    P. Guldenmund;A. Vanhaudenhuyse;R.D. Sanders;R.D. Sanders;J. Sleigh

  • Toward a theory of the general-anesthetic-induced phase transition of the cerebral cortex. I. A thermodynamics analogy.

    Moira L. Steyn-Ross;D. A. Steyn-Ross;J. W. Sleigh;Lara C. Wilcocks

  • The Sleep Cycle Modelled as a Cortical Phase Transition

    D. A. Steyn-Ross;Moira L. Steyn-Ross;J. W. Sleigh;M. T. Wilson

  • Sleep patterns in intensive care unit patients: a study using the bispectral index.

    T Nicholson;J Patel;J W Sleigh

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter Pickkers
Peter Pickkers Radboud University
William A. Denny
William A. Denny University of Auckland
Albert Dahan
Albert Dahan Leiden University Medical Center
Heidi E. Kirsch
Heidi E. Kirsch University of California, San Francisco
Pierre Gressens
Pierre Gressens Université Paris Cité
Andrew J. Szeri
Andrew J. Szeri University of California, Berkeley
Xiaoli Li
Xiaoli Li Singapore University of Technology and Design
Mark A. Kramer
Mark A. Kramer Boston University
Robert C. Read
Robert C. Read University of Southampton
Irene Tracey
Irene Tracey University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Neuroscience often opens doors to various related fields in mental health, counseling, and social services. Students interested in a more direct counseling role may consider a family therapy degree, which equips graduates with the skills to support couples and families through evidence-based therapeutic approaches.

Another popular path is psychology. For those looking for flexibility and value, pursuing a bachelors in psychology online provides foundational knowledge of human behavior and critical research techniques, opening doors to various entry-level positions and further studies. Advancing further, an online masters psychology program enables specialization in fields like clinical, organizational, or developmental psychology.

Additionally, careers in social work are closely aligned with neuroscience, especially when supporting individuals with neurological conditions or mental health challenges. The easiest msw online program can provide a direct route into community and healthcare settings where strong interdisciplinary knowledge is in demand.

Best Scientists Citing James W. Sleigh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles