World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
87
Citations
50338
World Ranking
13388
National Ranking
151

Matthew T. V. Chan publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew T. V. Chan sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 398 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthew T. V. Chan D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew T. V. Chan sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 87 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Matthew T. V. Chan is affiliated with the Chinese University of Hong Kong in China and has a research focus within the field of Medicine. Their work spans multiple subfields including Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Molecular Biology, Computational Mechanics, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

The scientist's research broadly covers topics related to clinical outcomes and therapeutic monitoring, including:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
  • Combustion and flame dynamics
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Fluid Dynamics and Turbulent Flows

Matthew T. V. Chan has contributed extensively to multiple publication venues, with frequent publications in:

  • British Journal of Anaesthesia (8 publications)
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials (7)
  • Anesthesiology (6)
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (4)
  • AIAA Scitech 2020 Forum (4)

Some notable recent papers include:

  • "American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19" (2021, Blood Advances)
  • "Anaesthetic depth and delirium after major surgery: a randomised clinical trial" (2021, British Journal of Anaesthesia)
  • "Tranexamic Acid in Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery" (2022, New England Journal of Medicine)
  • "Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study" (2020, Anaesthesia)
  • "Streptococcus thermophilus Inhibits Colorectal Tumorigenesis Through Secreting β-Galactosidase" (2020, Gastroenterology)

Frequent collaborators in their research include William Ka Kei Wu, P.J. Devereaux, Lin Zhang, Daniel I. Sessler, and Xiaodong Liu. These coauthors have contributed significantly to the wide-ranging research outputs of Matthew T. V. Chan, reflecting collaboration across clinical and scientific disciplines.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Consensus Guidelines for the Management of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

    Tong J Gan;Pierre Diemunsch;Ashraf S Habib;Anthony L Kovac

  • Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: the B-Aware randomised controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Kate Leslie;John James McNeil;John James McNeil;Andrew Benjamin Forbes;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

  • Association between postoperative troponin levels and 30-day mortality among patients undergoing noncardiac surgery

    P. J. Devereaux;M. T. Chan;P. Alonso-Coello

  • Myocardial Injury after Noncardiac Surgery: A Large, International, Prospective Cohort Study Establishing Diagnostic Criteria, Characteristics, Predictors, and 30-day Outcomes

    Fernando Botto;Pablo Alonso-Coello;Matthew T V Chan;Matthew T V Chan;Juan Carlos Villar

  • BIS-guided anesthesia decreases postoperative delirium and cognitive decline.

    Matthew T.V. Chan;Benny C.P. Cheng;Tatia M.C. Lee;Tony Gin

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Association of Postoperative High-Sensitivity Troponin Levels With Myocardial Injury and 30-Day Mortality Among Patients Undergoing Noncardiac Surgery.

    P. J. Devereaux;Bruce M. Biccard;Alben Sigamani;Denis Xavier

  • Restrictive versus Liberal Fluid Therapy for Major Abdominal Surgery

    Paul S Myles;Rinaldo Bellomo;Tomas Corcoran;Tomas Corcoran;Andrew Forbes

  • Global patient outcomes after elective surgery: Prospective cohort study in 27 low-, middle- and high-income countries

    T Ahmad;RA Bouwman;I Grigoras;C Aldecoa

  • Avoidance of nitrous oxide for patients undergoing major surgery - A randomized controlled trial

    Paul S Myles;Kate Leslie;Matthew T V Chan;Andrew Benjamin Forbes

  • Short-term preoperative smoking cessation and postoperative complications: a systematic review and meta-analysis

    Jean Wong;David Paul Lam;Amir Abrishami;Matthew T. V. Chan

  • Exhaled air dispersion during high-flow nasal cannula therapy versus CPAP via different masks.

    David S. Hui;Benny K. Chow;Thomas Lo;Owen T.Y. Tsang

  • American Society of Hematology 2021 guidelines on the use of anticoagulation for thromboprophylaxis in patients with COVID-19.

    Adam Cuker;Eric K. Tseng;Robby Nieuwlaat;Robby Nieuwlaat;Pantep Angchaisuksiri

  • Alterations in Enteric Virome Are Associated With Colorectal Cancer and Survival Outcomes

    Geicho Nakatsu;Haokui Zhou;William Ka Kei Wu;Sunny Hei Wong

  • NEAT1: A novel cancer-related long non-coding RNA.

    Xin Yu;Zheng Li;Heyi Zheng;Matthew T. V. Chan

  • Erratum to: Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition) (Autophagy, 12, 1, 1-222, 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Kotb Abdelmohsen;Akihisa Abe;Joynal Abedin

  • Intravenous Magnesium Sulphate for Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (IMASH) A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Phase III Trial

    George Kwok Chu Wong;Wai S. Poon;Matthew T.V. Chan;Ronald Boet

  • Risks to healthcare workers following tracheal intubation of patients with COVID-19: a prospective international multicentre cohort study.

    K. El‐Boghdadly;K. El‐Boghdadly;D. J. N. Wong;R. Owen;M. D. Neuman

Frequent Co-Authors

William K. K. Wu
William K. K. Wu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Paul S. Myles
Paul S. Myles Monash University
Philip J. Devereaux
Philip J. Devereaux Population Health Research Institute
Jun Yu
Jun Yu Chinese University of Hong Kong
Daniel I. Sessler
Daniel I. Sessler The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
Joseph J.Y. Sung
Joseph J.Y. Sung Nanyang Technological University
Andrew Forbes
Andrew Forbes Monash University
David S.C. Hui
David S.C. Hui Chinese University of Hong Kong
Rupert M. Pearse
Rupert M. Pearse Queen Mary University of London
Salim Yusuf
Salim Yusuf McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA often brings up questions about alternative study options and flexible career tracks. Online degrees and accelerated programs are gaining traction, providing faster and more affordable routes to rewarding healthcare professions. For those aiming for advanced practice, the easiest dnp programs can help working nurses achieve top clinical roles without extensive time away from work.

If you’re eager to begin your healthcare career quickly, check out fast track lpn programs that allow you to start as a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time than traditional programs. For those with an interest in mental health, there are psych nurse practitioner programs designed to fast-track your path to becoming a specialized nurse practitioner.

Beyond clinical work, leadership and administrative roles are also in demand. Consider earning an online master of health administration to prepare for careers in healthcare management and policy. These degree options offer flexibility, affordability, and diverse pathways to success in the U.S. healthcare system.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew T. V. Chan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles