World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
53
Citations
9113
World Ranking
4294
National Ranking
328

Andrew B. Smith publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew B. Smith sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 164 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Andrew B. Smith D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew B. Smith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 53 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Andrew B. Smith is a researcher affiliated with the Natural History Museum in the United Kingdom. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily within Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. Their research output covers subfields such as Molecular Biology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Infectious Diseases, Immunology, and Biomedical Engineering.

Smith's academic contributions involve several main topics, including:

  • Viral Infectious Diseases and Gene Expression in Insects
  • Protein purification and stability
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • Viral Infections and Outbreaks Research
  • Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation

Their recent publications cover a diverse range of scientific areas and include the following papers:

  • "Autophagy and intracellular product degradation genes identified by systems biology analysis reduce aggregation of bispecific antibody in CHO cells," 2022, New Biotechnology
  • "Antibody Responses to the SARS-CoV-2 Ancestral Strain and Omicron Variants in Moderna mRNA-1273 Vaccinated Active-Duty US Navy Sailors and Marines," 2023, The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • "Demonstration of continuous gradient elution functionality with automated liquid handling systems for high-throughput purification process development," 2022, Journal of Chromatography A
  • "0185 Circadian Rhythm of Rock Climbing Specific Finger Strength," 2023, SLEEP
  • "Cell-Resolved MR Spectroscopic Signatures for Cancer Cells Mapping: Dual-State Subspaces and GFP-Labeled Glioma Mouse Validation," 2025, Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Smith frequently collaborates with other researchers. Among their known coauthors are Mona Moradi Barzadd, Magnus Lundqvist, Claire Harris, Magdalena Malm, and Anna-Luisa Volk.

The venues where Smith's work has appeared include:

  • New Biotechnology
  • The Journal of Infectious Diseases
  • Journal of Chromatography A
  • SLEEP
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Best Publications

  • Large-scale heterogeneity of the fossil record: implications for Phanerozoic biodiversity studies.

    Andrew B. Smith

  • The phylogeny and classification of post-Palaeozoic echinoids

    Andreas Kroh;Andrew B. Smith

  • The Cretaceous-Tertiary biotic transition

    N. Macleod;P. F. Rawson;P. L. Forey;F. T. Banner;F. T. Banner

  • Rooting molecular trees: problems and strategies

    Andrew B. Smith

  • Deciphering deuterostome phylogeny: molecular, morphological and palaeontological perspectives

    Billie J Swalla;Andrew B Smith

  • THE SHAPE OF THE PHANEROZOIC MARINE PALAEODIVERSITY CURVE: HOW MUCH CAN BE PREDICTED FROM THE SEDIMENTARY ROCK RECORD OF WESTERN EUROPE?

    Andrew B. Smith;Alistair J. McGOWAN

  • Sea-level change and rock-record bias in the Cretaceous: a problem for extinction and biodiversity studies

    Andrew B. Smith;Andrew S. Gale;Neale E. A. Monks

  • Problems of Reproducibility-Does Geologically Ancient DNA Survive in Amber-Preserved Insects?

    Jeremy J. Austin;Andrew J. Ross;Andrew B. Smith;Richard A. Fortey

  • Marine biodiversity through the Late Cenomanian–Early Turonian: palaeoceanographic controls and sequence stratigraphic biases

    A. S. Gale;A. B. Smith;N. E. A. Monks;J. A. Young

  • Tectonics from fossils? Analysis of reef-coral and sea-urchin distributions from late Cretaceous to Recent, using a new method

    Brian R. Rosen;Andrew B. Smith

  • Systematics and the Fossil Record

    Peter J. Wagner;Andrew Smith

  • Testing the Molecular Clock: Molecular and Paleontological Estimates of Divergence Times in the Echinoidea (Echinodermata)

    Andrew B. Smith;Davide Pisani;Jacqueline A. Mackenzie-Dodds;Bruce Stockley

  • Dating the Time of Origin of Major Clades: Molecular Clocks and the Fossil Record

    Andrew B. Smith;Kevin J. Peterson

  • The interrelationships of the echinoderm classes: morphological and molecular evidence

    D. T. J. Littlewood;D. T. J. Littlewood;A. B. Smith;K. A. Clough;R. H. Emson

  • Selectivity of extinction among sea urchins at the end of the Cretaceous period

    Andrew B. Smith;Charlotte H. Jeffery

  • A Combined Morphological and Molecular Phylogeny for Sea Urchins (Echinoidea: Echinodermata)

    D. T. J. Littlewood;A. B. Smith

  • Phylogenetic Relationsghip, Divergence Times, and Rates of Molecular Evolution for Camarodent Sea Urchins

    Andrew B. Smith

  • AN OVERVIEW OF THE CLASSIFICATION AND EVOLUTION OF THE MAJOR SCARAB BEETLE CLADES (COLEOPTERA: SCARABAEOIDEA) BASED ON PRELIMINARY MOLECULAR ANALYSES

    Andrew B. T. Smith;David C. Hawks;John M. Heraty

  • Palaeontology in a molecular world: the search for authentic ancient DNA

    Jeremy J. Austin;Andrew B. Smith;Richard H. Thomas

  • Dynamic evolutionary change in post-Paleozoic echinoids and the importance of scale when interpreting changes in rates of evolution

    Melanie J. Hopkins;Andrew B. Smith

  • Implications of lantern morphology for the phylogeny of post-Palaeozoic echinoids

    Andrew B Smith

  • Taxonomy and fossils: a critical appraisal

    Peter L. Forey;Richard A. Fortey;Paul Kenrick;Andrew B. Smith

  • Resolving phylogenetic signal from noise when divergence is rapid: a new look at the old problem of echinoderm class relationships

    Davide Pisani;Roberto Feuda;Kevin J. Peterson;Andrew B. Smith

  • Palaeoanatomy and biological affinities of a Cambrian deuterostome (Stylophora)

    Sébastien Clausen;Andrew B. Smith

  • Plated Cambrian Bilaterians Reveal the Earliest Stages of Echinoderm Evolution

    Samuel Zamora;Imran A. Rahman;Andrew B. Smith

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeremy J. Austin
Jeremy J. Austin University of Adelaide
Richard A. Fortey
Richard A. Fortey Natural History Museum
Andrew S. Gale
Andrew S. Gale University of Portsmouth
Jeremy R. Young
Jeremy R. Young University College London
Paul D. Taylor
Paul D. Taylor American Museum of Natural History
J. Javier Álvaro
J. Javier Álvaro Spanish National Research Council
Kevin J. Peterson
Kevin J. Peterson Dartmouth College
Paul M. Barrett
Paul M. Barrett Natural History Museum
Gregory A. Wray
Gregory A. Wray Duke University
D. T. J. Littlewood
D. T. J. Littlewood Natural History Museum

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many begin by considering the what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get, which often includes programs that build a solid foundation without overwhelming difficulty. This approach can help streamline entry into environmental fields.

Specialized degrees like an online geoscience degree offer strong technical expertise, combining geology with environmental science to address natural resource management, climate change, and sustainability challenges.

Furthermore, geographic data plays a crucial role in environmental monitoring. Studying at one of the best GIS schools equips students with mapping and spatial analysis skills, increasing employability in conservation, urban planning, and disaster response.

For those seeking leadership roles, pursuing one of the top online MPA programs can prepare graduates for management positions in environmental policy, nonprofit organizations, and government agencies, blending science knowledge with public administration.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew B. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles