World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Albert R. Meyer

Albert R. Meyer

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
35
Citations
7668
World Ranking
8884
National Ranking
2471

Albert R. Meyer publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert R. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 114 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Albert R. Meyer D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Albert R. Meyer sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 35 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1987 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences

Overview

Albert R. Meyer is affiliated with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the United States. Their research intersects multiple disciplines, primarily focusing on computer science and social sciences, with significant contributions to the subfields of artificial intelligence, information systems, and education.

The scientist's work prominently addresses topics such as intelligent tutoring systems and adaptive learning, educational technology and assessment, and educational assessment and pedagogy. These areas reflect a concentration on how technology and pedagogical approaches can be integrated to enhance educational outcomes and assessments.

Recent academic output includes a publication titled "Automatic feedback on physics tasks using open-source generative artificial intelligence", published in 2025 in the International Journal of Science Education. This paper exemplifies the intersection of artificial intelligence and educational assessment in their research portfolio.

Frequent collaborators in their research endeavors include Tom Bleckmann and Gunnar Friege, highlighting ongoing partnerships that contribute to the development of their research themes and outputs.

The primary venue for their publications is the International Journal of Science Education, reflecting a focus on science education within their scholarly activities. The engagement with this specific journal underscores the applied nature of their work in educational contexts.

In recognition of their contributions to their fields of study, Albert R. Meyer was named a Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences in 1987. This award marks a notable achievement within their professional career.

  • Main fields of study: Computer Science, Social Sciences
  • Subfields of study: Artificial Intelligence, Information Systems, Education
  • Main research topics: Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning, Educational Technology and Assessment, Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
  • Recent paper: "Automatic feedback on physics tasks using open-source generative artificial intelligence" (2025), International Journal of Science Education
  • Frequent co-authors: Tom Bleckmann, Gunnar Friege
  • Frequent publication venue: International Journal of Science Education
  • Awards: Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (1987)

Best Publications

  • Word problems requiring exponential time(Preliminary Report)

    Unknown

  • The equivalence problem for regular expressions with squaring requires exponential space

    A. R. Meyer;L. J. Stockmeyer

  • Bisimulation can't be traced

    Bard Bloom;Sorin Istrail;Albert R. Meyer

  • Economy of description by automata, grammars, and formal systems

    A. R. Meyer;M. J. Fischer

  • Counter machines and counter languages

    Patrick C. Fischer;Albert R. Meyer;Arnold L. Rosenberg

  • Boolean matrix multiplication and transitive closure

    M. J. Fischer;A. R. Meyer

  • Coping with errors in binary search procedures

    Ronald L. Rivest;Albert R. Meyer;Daniel J. Kleitman;Karl Winklmann

  • What is a model of the lambda calculus

    Albert R. Meyer

  • Separating Nondeterministic Time Complexity Classes

    Joel I. Seiferas;Michael J. Fischer;Albert R. Meyer

  • Bisimulation can't be traced. Preliminary report

    B. Bloom;S. Istrail;A.R. Meyer

  • Exponential space complete problems for Petri nets and commutative semigroups (Preliminary Report)

    Unknown

  • Continuation Semantics in Typed Lambda-Calculi (Summary)

    Albert R. Meyer;Mitchell Wand

  • The semantics of second-order lambda calculus

    Kim B. Bruce;Albert R. Meyer;John C. Mitchell

  • Towards fully abstract semantics for local variables

    A. R. Meyer;K. Sieber

  • Real-Time Simulation of Multihead Tape Units

    Patrick C. Fischer;Albert R. Meyer;Arnold L. Rosenberg

  • Classes of computable functions defined by bounds on computation: Preliminary Report

    E. M. McCreight;A. R. Meyer

  • Computability and completeness in logics of programs (Preliminary Report)

    Unknown

  • Semantical paradigms: notes for an invited lecture

    A.R. Meyer;S.S. Cosmadakis

  • Deciding true concurrency equivalences on safe, finite nets

    Lalita Jategaonakar;Lalita Jategaonakar;Albert R. Meyer

  • Towards fully abstract semantics for local variables: preliminary report

    Albert R. Meyer;Kurt Sieber

  • "Type" is not a type

    Albert R. Meyer;Mark B. Reinhold

  • Program size in restricted programming languages

    Albert R. Meyer

  • The semantics of second order polymorphic lambda calculus.

    Kim B. Bruce;Albert R. Meyer

  • The Semantics of Local Storage, or What Makes the Free-List Free?

    Joseph Y. Halpern;Albert R. Meyer;Boris A. Trakhtenbrot

  • A Classification of the Recursive Functions

    Albert R. Meyer;Dennis M. Ritchie

  • The semantics of local storage, or what makes the free-list free?(Preliminary Report)

    Joseph Y. Halpern;Albert R. Meyer;B. A. Trakhtenbrot

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael J. Fischer
Michael J. Fischer Yale University
Joseph Y. Halpern
Joseph Y. Halpern Cornell University
Arnold L. Rosenberg
Arnold L. Rosenberg University of Massachusetts Amherst
John C. Mitchell
John C. Mitchell Stanford University
Mike Paterson
Mike Paterson University of Warwick
Sorin Istrail
Sorin Istrail Brown University
Shimon Even
Shimon Even Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Ashok K. Chandra
Ashok K. Chandra IBM (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As technology and engineering fields evolve, so do the available what can you do with a project management degree. Project management is a valuable skill, allowing professionals to lead complex technical teams and oversee large-scale engineering projects.

Those interested in emerging technologies may want to explore programs focused on the finance sector, such as a crypto degree. This can open the door to innovative roles within blockchain, cryptocurrency, and fintech industries.

Versatile online programs are also available outside traditional engineering tracks. For example, the demand for professionals trained in sports technology and analytics is growing, and you can fast-track your credentials with an online sports degree.

Urban environments are rapidly adopting smart tech and sustainable design solutions. If urban planning interests you, consider pursuing the cheapest online master's in urban planning to help shape the future of our cities without breaking the bank.

These online degrees offer flexible pathways for those wanting to blend engineering and technology expertise with dynamic, real-world applications.

Best Scientists Citing Albert R. Meyer

Recently Published Articles