World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
75
Citations
45240
World Ranking
1370
National Ranking
24

David Harel publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Harel sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 351 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

David Harel D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Harel sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2020 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Sciences
  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2014 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For invention of statecharts and contributions to the logic of programming.
  • 2007 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2007 - ACM Software System Award For Statemate, the first embodiment in a commercial computer-aided software engineering tool of a rigorous approach to model-driven development based on statecharts, and employing techniques for the executability of visual formalisms, and for code-generation.
  • 2006 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1994 - ACM Fellow A brilliant expositor, he has exposed laymen to deep computer science concepts through his widely acclaimed book Algorithmics, the Spirit of Computing (1987) and through numerous lectures to a variety of audiences. His work on Israeli national councils and ministerial committees is profoundly influencing curricula at both the high-school and university level.
  • 1992 - ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award A brilliant expositor, he has exposed laymen to deep computer science concepts through his widely acclaimed book Algorithmics, the Spirit of Computing (1987) and through numerous lectures to a variety of audiences. His work on Israeli national councils and ministerial committees is profoundly influencing curricula at both the high-school and university level.

Overview

David Harel is affiliated with the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with significant contributions in subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Software, Information Systems, Computational Theory and Mathematics, and Social Psychology.

The main topics of their research work include Software Engineering Research, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Reinforcement Learning in Robotics, and Formal Methods in Verification.

Frequent publication venues for David Harel include arXiv (Cornell University) with 17 publications, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences with 3 publications, Science China Information Sciences and IEEE Design and Test each with 2, and Nature with 1 publication.

Recent papers published by David Harel include:

  • Categorizing methods for integrating machine learning with executable specifications, 2023, Science China Information Sciences
  • Creating a Foundation for Next-Generation Autonomous Systems, 2021, IEEE Design and Test

Other recent papers by co-authors include works such as "A measure of smell enables the creation of olfactory metamers" (2020, Nature), "Trustworthy Autonomous System Development" (2022, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems), and "Computational Paradigm to Elucidate the Effects of Arts-Based Approaches: Art and Music Studies and Implications for Research and Therapy" (2020, Frontiers in Psychology).

Frequent co-authors of David Harel are Assaf Marron, Smadar Szekely, Raz Yerushalmi, Guy Amir, and Guy Katz.

David Harel has received several awards and honors, including:

  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom (2020)
  • Member of the National Academy of Sciences (2019)
  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences (2014)
  • Member of the National Academy of Engineering (2014) for invention of statecharts and contributions to the logic of programming
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2007)
  • ACM Software System Award (2007) for Statemate, a computer-aided software engineering tool based on statecharts
  • Member of Academia Europaea (2006)
  • ACM Fellow (1994) recognized for contributions in algorithmics and educational outreach
  • ACM Karl V. Karlstrom Outstanding Educator Award (1992) for impactful educational contributions related to algorithmics and computing curricula

Best Publications

  • Statecharts: A visual formalism for complex systems

    David Harel

  • Dynamic Logic

    David Harel;Dexter Kozen;Jerzy Tiuryn

  • On visual formalisms

    David Harel

  • STATEMATE: a working environment for the development of complex reactive systems

    D. Harel;H. Lachover;A. Naamad;A. Pnueli

  • Executable object modeling with statecharts

    D. Harel;E. Gery

  • The STATEMATE semantics of statecharts

    David Harel;Amnon Naamad

  • On the development of reactive systems

    D. Harel;A. Pnueli

  • LSCs: Breathing Life into Message Sequence Charts

    Werner Damm;David Harel

  • First-Order Dynamic Logic

    David Harel

  • Modeling Reactive Systems With Statecharts : The Statemate Approach

    David Harel;Michal Politi

  • Drawing graphs nicely using simulated annealing

    Ron Davidson;David Harel

  • Meaningful modeling: what's the semantics of "semantics"?

    D. Harel;B. Rumpe

  • Come, Let's Play: Scenario-Based Programming Using LSCs and the Play-Engine

    David Harel;Rami Marelly

  • Algorithmics: The Spirit of Computing

    David Harel;Yishai Feldman

  • Structure and complexity of relational queries

    Ashok K. Chandra;David Harel

  • A fast multi-scale method for drawing large graphs.

    David Harel;Yehuda Koren

  • Computable queries for relational data bases

    Ashok K. chandra;David Harel

  • Graph drawing by high-dimensional embedding.

    David Harel;Yehuda Koren

  • HORN CLAUSE QUERIES AND GENERALIZATIONS

    Ashok K. Chandra;David Harel

  • Come, Let’s Play

    David Harel;Rami Marelly

  • On the Formal Semantics of Statecharts (Extended Abstract)

    David Harel;Amir Pnueli;Jeanette P. Schmidt;Rivi Sherman

  • Statemate: a working environment for the development of complex reactive systems

    D. Harel;H. Lachover;A. Naamad;A. Pnueli

Frequent Co-Authors

Amir Pnueli
Amir Pnueli Weizmann Institute of Science
Dexter Kozen
Dexter Kozen Cornell University
Yehuda Koren
Yehuda Koren Google (United States)
Irun R. Cohen
Irun R. Cohen Weizmann Institute of Science
Doron Lancet
Doron Lancet Weizmann Institute of Science
Ashok K. Chandra
Ashok K. Chandra IBM (United States)
Moshe Y. Vardi
Moshe Y. Vardi Rice University
Noam Sobel
Noam Sobel Weizmann Institute of Science
Joel L. Sussman
Joel L. Sussman Weizmann Institute of Science
Orna Kupferman
Orna Kupferman Hebrew University of Jerusalem

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to many different degree and career options. For those interested in flexible and faster alternatives, there are easy degrees to get online that pay well, allowing you to accelerate your education and quickly enter high-demand fields.

Artificial intelligence is another booming area within computer science. There are now ai degrees online that provide a pathway into cutting-edge tech careers, often at a fraction of the traditional cost.

Choosing your area of study is an important first step. Reviewing a list of college majors can help you align your interests with fast-growing industries like cybersecurity, software engineering, or data science.

For those considering advanced education, pursuing an easy online masters degree is another way to boost your skill set and career prospects. Online degrees offer crucial flexibility while opening the door to a wide range of technical and leadership roles in the industry.

Best Scientists Citing David Harel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles