World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mikhail E. Nasrallah

Mikhail E. Nasrallah

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Genetics 59 3240 3066 1408 1322 96 12623

Mikhail E. Nasrallah publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mikhail E. Nasrallah between 1967 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mikhail E. Nasrallah published across 58 years, from 1967 to 2024, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1991. 1 of the 96 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1967 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1991. 1967: 1 publication 1968: 1 publication 1969: 0 publications 1970: 1 publication 1971: 0 publications 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 1 publication 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 3 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 9 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 3 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 5 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1967 2024

96 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mikhail E. Nasrallah: publications per year, 1967 to 2024
Year Publications
1967 1
1968 1
1969 0
1970 1
1971 0
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 1
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 1
1985 3
1986 2
1987 2
1988 1
1989 3
1990 3
1991 9
1992 6
1993 8
1994 5
1995 1
1996 3
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 6
2001 4
2002 3
2003 0
2004 2
2005 2
2006 1
2007 5
2008 1
2009 5
2010 1
2011 2
2012 0
2013 1
2014 2
2015 1
2016 0
2017 0
2018 1
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 96
Download as CSV

Mikhail E. Nasrallah publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail E. Nasrallah sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 95–104 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 96 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151 96
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Mikhail E. Nasrallah D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mikhail E. Nasrallah sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 58–59 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162 59
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mikhail E. Nasrallah is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broad areas, their work further focuses on subfields including Molecular Biology, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, and Plant Science.

The main topics of Nasrallah's research include Plant Reproductive Biology, Plant and Animal Studies, and Plant Molecular Biology Research. These subjects reflect an interdisciplinary approach that connects molecular mechanisms with ecological and evolutionary processes in plants.

Nasrallah has contributed to scholarly literature with publications in established venues. Notably, their recent work appeared in Nature Ecology & Evolution, a venue that has featured their research at least once.

  • A pollen selection system links self and interspecific incompatibility in the Brassicaceae, 2024, Nature Ecology & Evolution

The scientist has collaborated with a number of co-authors, indicating a network of research partnerships that support their investigations. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Bo Liu
  • Mengya Li
  • Jianfang Qiu
  • Jing Xue
  • Wenhong Liu

Best Publications

  • The male determinant of self-incompatibility in Brassica.

    Christel R. Schopfer;Mikhail E. Nasrallah;June B. Nasrallah

  • Molecular cloning of a putative receptor protein kinase gene encoded at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea

    Joshua C. Stein;Bruce Howlett;Douglas C. Boyes;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the basis of rapid genome size change

    Tina T. Hu;Pedro Pattyn;Erica G. Bakker;Jun Cao

  • A cDNA clone encoding an S-locus-specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleracea

    J. B. Nasrallah;T.-H. Kao;M. L. Goldberg;M. E. Nasrallah

  • Allele-specific receptor-ligand interactions in Brassica self-incompatibility.

    Aardra Kachroo;Christel R. Schopfer;Mikhail E. Nasrallah;June B. Nasrallah

  • Self-incompatibility in the genus Arabidopsis: characterization of the S locus in the outcrossing A. lyrata and its autogamous relative A. thaliana.

    Makoto Kusaba;Kathleen Dwyer;Jennifer Hendershot;Julia Vrebalov

  • Pollen—Stigma Signaling in the Sporophytic Self-Incompatibility Response.

    June B. Nasrallah;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • Amino-acid sequence of glycoproteins encoded by three alleles of the S locus of Brassica oleracea

    J. B. Nasrallah;Teh-hui Kao;Teh-hui Kao;C. H. Chen;M. L. Goldberg

  • Generation of Self-Incompatible Arabidopsis thaliana by Transfer of Two S Locus Genes from A. lyrata

    Mikhail E. Nasrallah;Pei Liu;June B. Nasrallah

  • The Self-Incompatibility Genes of Brassica: Expression and Use in Genetic Ablation of Floral Tissues

    June B. Nasrallah;Takeshi Nishio;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • Self-incompatibility genes of Brassica oleracea: Expression, isolation, and structure

    June B. Nasrallah;Su-May Yu;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • Natural variation in expression of self-incompatibility in Arabidopsis thaliana: Implications for the evolution of selfing

    M. E. Nasrallah;P. Liu;S. Sherman-Broyles;N. A. Boggs

  • A highly conserved Brassica gene with homology to the S-locus-specific glycoprotein structural gene.

    Beth A. Lalonde;Mikhail E. Nasrallah;Kathleen G. Dwyer;Che-Hong Chen

  • Genetic evidence for the requirement of the Brassica S-locus receptor kinase gene in the self-incompatibility response

    June B. Nasrallah;Sabine J. Rundle;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • The self-incompatibility (S) haplotypes of Brassica contain highly divergent and rearranged sequences of ancient origin.

    Douglas C. Boyes;Mikhail E. Nasrallah;Julia Vrebalov;June B. Nasrallah

  • Comparative genome analyses of Arabidopsis spp.: Inferring chromosomal rearrangement events in the evolutionary history of A. thaliana

    Krithika Yogeeswaran;Amy Frary;Thomas L. York;Alison Amenta

  • Pollen-pistil interactions and developmental regulation of pollen tube growth in Arabidopsis

    Muthugapatti K. Kandasamy;June B. Nasrallah;Mikhail E. Nasrallah

  • The S-locus specific glycoproteins of Brassica accumulate in the cell wall of developing stigma papillae.

    M.K. Kandasamy;D.J. Paolillo;C.D. Faraday;J.B. Nasrallah

  • An aquaporin-like gene required for the Brassica self-incompatibility response.

    Seishi Ikeda;June B. Nasrallah;Ram Dixit;Susanne Preiss

  • SRK, the Stigma-Specific S Locus Receptor Kinase of Brassica, Is Targeted to the Plasma Membrane in Transgenic Tobacco

    Joshua C. Stein;Ram Dixit;Mikhail E. Nasrallah;June B. Nasrallah

Frequent Co-Authors

June B. Nasrallah
June B. Nasrallah Cornell University
Joshua C. Stein
Joshua C. Stein Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory
Michael L. Goldberg
Michael L. Goldberg Cornell University
Takeshi Nishio
Takeshi Nishio Tohoku University
Magnus Nordborg
Magnus Nordborg Austrian Academy of Sciences
Teh-hui Kao
Teh-hui Kao Pennsylvania State University
Steven D. Tanksley
Steven D. Tanksley Cornell University
Igor V. Grigoriev
Igor V. Grigoriev Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Yves Van de Peer
Yves Van de Peer Ghent University
Detlef Weigel
Detlef Weigel Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re interested in Genetics, a range of mha online programs or healthcare administration degrees can offer a valuable complement to your scientific studies. These programs help you gain skills in managing healthcare systems and understanding the business side of medical fields, which can be beneficial for genetics-related careers.

Many students also explore nursing as a pathway, especially given the growing demand for healthcare professionals with genetic knowledge. You’ll find accelerated options, such as fast track lpn programs, that let you earn qualifications quickly and enter the workforce sooner.

For those seeking career advancement without extensive entrance testing, there are lpn to rn programs without teas test. These programs streamline your educational path, focusing on hands-on skills and essential knowledge.

If your goal is research, teaching, or leadership in genetics or healthcare, consider pursuing an online phd nursing degree. This qualification opens doors to advanced roles and positions you as a subject-matter expert in the evolving field of healthcare and genetics.

Best Scientists Citing Mikhail E. Nasrallah

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles