World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael L. Goldberg

Michael L. Goldberg

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
52
Citations
8894
World Ranking
16768
National Ranking
6920

Michael L. Goldberg publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael L. Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 85 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Michael L. Goldberg D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael L. Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 52 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael L. Goldberg is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily falls within the field of Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, with a focus on Molecular Biology, Cell Biology, and Plant Science as subfields. The scientist's work engages multiple topics, including Microtubule and mitosis dynamics, Nuclear Structure and Function, Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways, Photosynthetic Processes and Mechanisms, Gene Regulatory Network Analysis, Cellular transport and secretion, and Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation.

Goldberg has published research in various scholarly venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Current Biology
  • PLoS Genetics
  • Cell Death Discovery

The recent papers associated with this scientist cover several relevant biological topics. These include:

  • Cell biology: How to short-circuit the cell cycle, 2022, Current Biology
  • An evolutionarily conserved role for separase in the regulation of nuclear lamins, 2025, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Drosophila Trus, the orthologue of mammalian PDCD2L, is required for proper cell proliferation, larval developmental timing, and oogenesis, 2024, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Drosophila Trus, the orthologue of mammalian PDCD2L, is required for proper cell proliferation, larval developmental timing, and oogenesis, 2025, PLoS Genetics
  • An evolutionarily conserved role for separase in the regulation of nuclear lamins, 2025, Cell Death Discovery

Frequent coauthors who have collaborated with Goldberg include Francesca Cipressa, Gaëlle Pennarun, Giuseppe Bosso, Serena Rosignoli, and Liliana Tullo. These collaborations indicate ongoing work within interconnected research groups.

Best Publications

  • A cDNA clone encoding an S-locus-specific glycoprotein from Brassica oleracea

    J. B. Nasrallah;T.-H. Kao;M. L. Goldberg;M. E. Nasrallah

  • Mutations in twinstar, a Drosophila gene encoding a cofilin/ADF homologue, result in defects in centrosome migration and cytokinesis.

    Kristin C. Gunsalus;Silvia Bonaccorsi;Erika Williams;Fiammetta Verni

  • Specification of kinetochore-forming chromatin by the histone H3 variant CENP-A.

    Aaron A. Van Hooser;Aaron A. Van Hooser;Ilia I. Ouspenski;Ilia I. Ouspenski;Heather C. Gregson;Heather C. Gregson;Daniel A. Starr;Daniel A. Starr

  • Amino-acid sequence of glycoproteins encoded by three alleles of the S locus of Brassica oleracea

    J. B. Nasrallah;Teh-hui Kao;Teh-hui Kao;C. H. Chen;M. L. Goldberg

  • ZW10 Helps Recruit Dynactin and Dynein to the Kinetochore

    Daniel A. Starr;Byron C. Williams;Thomas S. Hays;Michael L. Goldberg

  • Mutations in the Essential Spindle Checkpoint Gene bub1 Cause Chromosome Missegregation and Fail to Block Apoptosis in Drosophila

    Joydeep Basu;Hassan Bousbaa;Elsa Logarinho;ZeXiao Li

  • Human Zw10 and ROD are mitotic checkpoint proteins that bind to kinetochores.

    G. K. T. Chan;S. A. Jablonski;D. A. Starr;D. A. Starr;M. L. Goldberg

  • Three classes of genes mutated in colorectal cancers with chromosomal instability.

    Zhenghe Wang;Jordan M. Cummins;Dong Shen;Daniel P. Cahill;Daniel P. Cahill

  • The Drosophila grapes gene is related to checkpoint gene chk1/rad27 and is required for late syncytial division fidelity

    Patrick Fogarty;Shelagh D. Campbell;Robin Abu-Shumays;Brigitte de Saint Phalle

  • Greatwall Kinase Participates in the Cdc2 Autoregulatory Loop in Xenopus Egg Extracts

    Jiangtao Yu;Yong Zhao;ZeXiao Li;Simon Galas

  • Neocentromere activity of structurally acentric mini-chromosomes in Drosophila

    Byron C. Williams;Terence D. Murphy;Michael L. Goldberg;Gary H. Karpen

  • The M Phase Kinase Greatwall (Gwl) Promotes Inactivation of PP2A/B55δ, a Phosphatase Directed Against CDK Phosphosites

    Priscila V. Castilho;Byron C. Williams;Satoru Mochida;Yong Zhao

  • Cooperative interactions between the central spindle and the contractile ring during Drosophila cytokinesis

    Maria Grazia Giansanti;Silvia Bonaccorsi;Byron Williams;Erika V. Williams

  • Greatwall kinase: a nuclear protein required for proper chromosome condensation and mitotic progression in Drosophila

    Jiangtao Yu;Shawna L. Fleming;Byron Williams;Erika V. Williams

  • The Drosophila kinesin-like protein KLP3A is a midbody component required for central spindle assembly and initiation of cytokinesis.

    B C Williams;M F Riedy;E V Williams;M Gatti

  • Two putative acetyltransferases, san and deco, are required for establishing sister chromatid cohesion in Drosophila.

    Byron C. Williams;Carrie M. Garrett-Engele;Zexiao Li;Erika V. Williams

  • The Drosophila l(1)zw10 gene product, required for accurate mitotic chromosome segregation, is redistributed at anaphase onset.

    B C Williams;T L Karr;J M Montgomery;M L Goldberg

  • Cofilin/ADF is required for cell motility during Drosophila ovary development and oogenesis

    Jiong Chen;Dorothea Godt;Kris Gunsalus;Istvan Kiss

  • UbcD1, a Drosophila ubiquitin-conjugating enzyme required for proper telomere behavior.

    Giovanni Cenci;Robert B. Rawson;Giorgio Belloni;Diego H. Castrillon

  • The rate of poleward chromosome motion is attenuated in Drosophila zw10 and rod mutants

    Matthew S. Savoian;Michael L. Goldberg;Conly L. Rieder;Conly L. Rieder

Frequent Co-Authors

Maurizio Gatti
Maurizio Gatti Sapienza University of Rome
Conly L. Rieder
Conly L. Rieder New York State Department of Health
Tim J. Yen
Tim J. Yen Fox Chase Cancer Center
June B. Nasrallah
June B. Nasrallah Cornell University
Mikhail E. Nasrallah
Mikhail E. Nasrallah Cornell University
Claudio E. Sunkel
Claudio E. Sunkel University of Porto
David Shalloway
David Shalloway Cornell University
Marcus B. Smolka
Marcus B. Smolka Cornell University
Brian E. Wadzinski
Brian E. Wadzinski Vanderbilt University
Mariana F. Wolfner
Mariana F. Wolfner Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA, there are a range of online degrees and alternative career options to explore. For those interested in the healthcare business, a cheapest online mba healthcare can open doors to leadership roles without the usual high tuition costs.

Clinical knowledge also translates well into allied health careers, such as medical coding. Comparing a certified professional coder to other certifications can help you choose the right qualification for your goals and salary expectations.

Entry into medical coding is accessible for science graduates, with medical coding jobs salary offering stable incomes and flexible work arrangements. Many find this career path rewarding due to remote opportunities and a growing job market.

Still wondering is medical coding a good job? Consider the pros and cons, such as job security, advancement potential, and the satisfaction of working in healthcare systems—without direct patient care. These online degrees and certifications provide versatile options for those with a background in biology or biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Michael L. Goldberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles