World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Plant Science and Agronomy

D-Index
38
Citations
4588
World Ranking
4474
National Ranking
280

Onno Muller publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Onno Muller sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36 publications 467+

This scientist: 84 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

Onno Muller D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Onno Muller sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Temperature acclimation of photosynthesis: mechanisms involved in the changes in temperature dependence of photosynthetic rate

    Kouki Hikosaka;Kazumasa Ishikawa;Almaz Borjigidai;Onno Muller

  • Modulation of photosynthetic energy conversion efficiency in nature: from seconds to seasons

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;Christopher M. Cohu;Onno Muller;William W. Adams

  • Sun-induced fluorescence - a new probe of photosynthesis: First maps from the imaging spectrometer HyPlant.

    Uwe Rascher;L Alonso;Andreas Burkart;C Cilia;C Cilia

  • May photoinhibition be a consequence, rather than a cause, of limited plant productivity?

    William W. Adams;Onno Muller;Christopher M. Cohu;Barbara Demmig-Adams

  • Modelling strategies for assessing and increasing the effectiveness of new phenotyping techniques in plant breeding

    Fred A. van Eeuwijk;Daniela Bustos-Korts;Emilie J. Millet;Martin P. Boer

  • Fluspect-B: a model for leaf fluorescence, reflectance and transmittance spectra.

    Nastassia Vilfan;Christiaan van der Tol;Onno Muller;Uwe Rascher

  • Phenotyping: New Windows into the Plant for Breeders.

    Michelle Watt;Fabio Fiorani;Björn Usadel;Björn Usadel;Uwe Rascher

  • Experimental warming studies on tree species and forest ecosystems: a literature review

    Haegeun Chung;Hiroyuki Muraoka;Masahiro Nakamura;Saerom Han

  • Emerging trade‐offs – impact of photoprotectants (PsbS, xanthophylls, and vitamin E) on oxylipins as regulators of development and defense

    Barbara Demmig-Adams;Christopher M. Cohu;Véronique Amiard;Guus van Zadelhoff

  • Quantitative assessment of disease severity and rating of barley cultivars based on hyperspectral imaging in a non-invasive, automated phenotyping platform.

    Stefan Thomas;Stefan Thomas;Jan Behmann;Angelina Steier;Thorsten Kraska

  • Measuring the dynamic photosynthome.

    Erik H Murchie;Shawn Kefauver;Jose Luis Araus;Onno Muller

  • The High-Performance Airborne Imaging Spectrometer HyPlant-From Raw Images to Top-of-Canopy Reflectance and Fluorescence Products: Introduction of an Automatized Processing Chain

    Bastian Siegmann;Luis Alonso;Marco Celesti;Sergio Cogliati

  • Using reflectance to explain vegetation biochemical and structural effects on sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence

    Peiqi Yang;Christiaan van der Tol;Wout Verhoef;Alexander Damm;Alexander Damm

  • Quantifying Lodging Percentage and Lodging Severity Using a UAV-Based Canopy Height Model Combined with an Objective Threshold Approach

    Norman Wilke;Bastian Siegmann;Lasse Klingbeil;Andreas Burkart

  • Seasonal changes in light and temperature affect the balance between light harvesting and light utilisation components of photosynthesis in an evergreen understory shrub

    Onno Muller;Onno Muller;Kouki Hikosaka;Tadaki Hirose

  • Habitat Temperature and Precipitation of Arabidopsis thaliana Ecotypes Determine the Response of Foliar Vasculature, Photosynthesis, and Transpiration to Growth Temperature

    William W. Adams;Jared J. Stewart;Christopher M. Cohu;Onno Muller

  • The Cassava Source-Sink project: opportunities and challenges for crop improvement by metabolic engineering.

    Uwe Sonnewald;Alisdair R. Fernie;Wilhelm Gruissem;Wilhelm Gruissem;Pascal Schläpfer

  • Foliar phloem infrastructure in support of photosynthesis

    William Walter Adams;Christopher M Cohu;Onno Muller;Barbara Demmig-Adams

  • Low temperature acclimation of photosynthetic capacity and leaf morphology in the context of phloem loading type

    Matthew R. Dumlao;Matthew R. Dumlao;Anza Darehshouri;Anza Darehshouri;Christopher M. Cohu;Onno Muller

  • Growth temperature impact on leaf form and function in Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes from northern and southern Europe

    Jared J. Stewart;Barbara Demmig‐Adams;Christopher M. Cohu;Coleman A. Wenzl

  • Association between photosynthesis and contrasting features of minor veins in leaves of summer annuals loading phloem via symplastic versus apoplastic routes.

    Onno Muller;Christopher M. Cohu;Jared J. Stewart;Johanna A. Protheroe

Frequent Co-Authors

Uwe Rascher
Uwe Rascher Forschungszentrum Jülich
Barbara Demmig-Adams
Barbara Demmig-Adams University of Colorado Boulder
William W. Adams
William W. Adams University of Colorado Boulder
Ulrich Schurr
Ulrich Schurr Forschungszentrum Jülich
Kouki Hikosaka
Kouki Hikosaka Tohoku University
Alexander Damm
Alexander Damm University of Zurich
Fabio Fiorani
Fabio Fiorani Forschungszentrum Jülich
Tsutom Hiura
Tsutom Hiura University of Tokyo
Shizue Matsubara
Shizue Matsubara Forschungszentrum Jülich
Beat Keller
Beat Keller University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Onno Muller

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles