World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
96
Citations
32176
World Ranking
446
National Ranking
247

John C. Mitchell publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 250 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 560 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 424 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 378 scientists 262–271 publications: 300 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 326 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

John C. Mitchell D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John C. Mitchell sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 984 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 969 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 765 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 517 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 96 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2017 - Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • 2008 - ACM Fellow For contributions to the theory of programming languages.
  • 2004 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom
  • 1998 - Member of Academia Europaea
  • 1992 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • 1976 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1966 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John C. Mitchell is affiliated with Stanford University in the United States. Their primary field of study is Computer Science, with a focus on subfields including Artificial Intelligence, Clinical Psychology, Surgery, Molecular Biology, and Information Systems.

Their research encompasses a range of topics, notably:

  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Colorectal and Anal Carcinomas
  • Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
  • Online Learning and Analytics
  • Privacy-Preserving Technologies in Data
  • Computational Drug Discovery Methods

John C. Mitchell has published extensively, with frequent venues including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Cancers
  • OECD going digital toolkit notes
  • UNC Libraries
  • Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Some recent papers include:

  • "Supercomputer-Based Ensemble Docking Drug Discovery Pipeline with Application to Covid-19," 2020, Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling
  • "TrustLLM: Trustworthiness in Large Language Models," 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Identifying and Mitigating the Security Risks of Generative AI," 2023, Foundations and Trends® in Privacy and Security
  • "Trehalose as an alternative to glycerol as a glassing agent for in vivo DNP MRI," 2020, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
  • "Psychotropic medication use in treatment-seeking youth with eating disorders," 2020, European Eating Disorders Review

The scientist collaborates frequently with several co-authors, among whom are:

  • Anupam Datta (4 joint publications)
  • Clark Barrett (3 joint publications)
  • Brad Boyd (2 joint publications)
  • Nicholas Carlini (2 joint publications)
  • Brad Chen (2 joint publications)

Across their career, John C. Mitchell has received several honors, including:

  • Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, 2017
  • ACM Fellow, 2008, for contributions to the theory of programming languages
  • Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, 2004
  • Member of Academia Europaea, 1998
  • Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 1992
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), 1976 and 1966

Best Publications

  • Design of a role-based trust-management framework

    Ninghui Li;J.C. Mitchell;W.H. Winsborough

  • Architectural support for copy and tamper-resistant software

    David Lie Chandramohan Thekkath;Mark Mitchell;Patrick Lincoln;Dan Boneh

  • Foundations for Programming Languages

    John C. Mitchell

  • Automated analysis of cryptographic protocols using Mur/spl phi/

    J.C. Mitchell;M. Mitchell;U. Stern

  • Abstract types have existential type

    John C. Mitchell;Gordon D. Plotkin

  • Third-Party Web Tracking: Policy and Technology

    J. R. Mayer;J. C. Mitchell

  • Client-Side Defense Against Web-Based Identity Theft.

    Neil Chou;Robert Ledesma;Yuka Teraguchi;John C. Mitchell

  • Robust defenses for cross-site request forgery

    Adam Barth;Collin Jackson;John C. Mitchell

  • Type systems for programming languages

    John C. Mitchell

  • Distributed credential chain discovery in trust management

    Ninghui Li;William H. Winsborough;John C. Mitchell

  • Privacy and contextual integrity: framework and applications

    A. Barth;A. Datta;J.C. Mitchell;H. Nissenbaum

  • Stronger password authentication using browser extensions

    Blake Ross;Collin Jackson;Nick Miyake;Dan Boneh

  • A Summary of the CMIP5 Experiment Design

    Karl E. Taylor;Ronald J. Stouffer;Gerald A. Meehl;Peter Cox

  • Theoretical Aspects of Computer Software

    Masami Hagiya;John C. Mitchell

  • State of the Art: Automated Black-Box Web Application Vulnerability Testing

    Jason Bau;Elie Bursztein;Divij Gupta;John Mitchell

  • Text-based CAPTCHA strengths and weaknesses

    Elie Bursztein;Matthieu Martin;John Mitchell

  • F-bounded polymorphism for object-oriented programming

    Peter Canning;William Cook;Walter Hill;Walter Olthoff

  • Foundations of programming languages

    John C. Mitchell

  • Decision problems for propositional linear logic

    Patrick Lincoln;Patrick Lincoln;John C. Mitchell;Andre Scedrov;Natarajan Shankar

  • Practical declarative network management

    Timothy L. Hinrichs;Natasha S. Gude;Martin Casado;John C. Mitchell

  • A meta-notation for protocol analysis

    I. Cervesato;N.A. Durgin;P.D. Lincoln;J.C. Mitchell

Frequent Co-Authors

Anupam Datta
Anupam Datta Carnegie Mellon University
Andre Scedrov
Andre Scedrov University of Pennsylvania
William A. Brantley
William A. Brantley The Ohio State University
A. C. Weber
A. C. Weber University of Oxford
Richard W Gran
Richard W Gran University of Minnesota
Maury Goodman
Maury Goodman Argonne National Laboratory
Harvey B Newman
Harvey B Newman California Institute of Technology
P. Gouffon
P. Gouffon Universidade de São Paulo
M. Bishai
M. Bishai Brookhaven National Laboratory
J. K. Nelson
J. K. Nelson William & Mary

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in STEM fields can open up exciting career opportunities alongside Computer Science. Many reputable universities now offer flexible programs in engineering, data science, and related subjects to help students upskill from anywhere.

For those interested in engineering, you can find online mechanical engineering degrees that balance affordability with quality education. Similarly, if you’re curious about the sciences, you might wonder, can you get a physics degree online? Today, flexible online physics programs make this not only possible, but increasingly popular.

Data science continues to see enormous growth in demand. For graduate-level aspirants, pursuing the cheapest data science masters in usa can help launch a lucrative career without the burden of excessive tuition costs. Additionally, those interested in electronics or telecommunications should consider programs with transparent costs, such as the electrical engineering online tuition costs guide.

Online study provides flexibility and a range of career pathways, making it easier than ever to pursue a degree that aligns with your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing John C. Mitchell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles