World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Ryan Williams

Ryan Williams

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
7686
World Ranking
8796
National Ranking
3761

Ryan Williams publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Williams sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 170 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Ryan Williams D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ryan Williams sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ryan Williams is a researcher affiliated with MIT in the United States, specializing in computer science with a focus on computational theory and mathematics.

Their work spans several main fields of study, including:

  • Computer Science

Within computer science, they are active in multiple subfields such as:

  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Computer Networks and Communications
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine

The primary research topics covered in their publications include:

  • Complexity and Algorithms in Graphs
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Advanced Graph Theory Research
  • Cryptography and Data Security
  • Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Semigroups and Automata Theory
  • Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization

Ryan Williams has published papers extensively in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (Schloss Dagstuhl)
  • SIAM Journal on Computing
  • Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • ACM Transactions on Algorithms

Some of their recent publications include:

  • "Real-world use of apixaban for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis in children with cardiac disease," 2023, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "Deterministic APSP, Orthogonal Vectors, and More," 2020, ACM Transactions on Algorithms
  • "Circuit Lower Bounds for Nondeterministic Quasi-polytime from a New Easy Witness Lemma," 2020, SIAM Journal on Computing
  • "Improved Merlin-Arthur Protocols for Central Problems in Fine-Grained Complexity," 2023, Algorithmica
  • "Lower Bounds Against Sparse Symmetric Functions of ACC Circuits: Expanding the Reach of #SAT Algorithms," 2022, Theory of Computing Systems

Their frequent collaborators include:

  • Nikhil Vyas
  • Ce Jin
  • Lijie Chen
  • Christina VanderPluym
  • Paul Esteso

Best Publications

  • On the complexity of optimal K-anonymity

    Adam Meyerson;Ryan Williams

  • A new algorithm for optimal 2-constraint satisfaction and its implications

    Ryan Williams

  • Backdoors to typical case complexity

    Ryan Williams;Carla P. Gomes;Bart Selman

  • Subcubic Equivalences between Path, Matrix and Triangle Problems

    Virginia Vassilevska Williams;Ryan Williams

  • Finding paths of length k in O∗(2k) time

    Ryan Williams

  • Non-uniform ACC Circuit Lower Bounds

    Ryan Williams

  • On the possibility of faster SAT algorithms

    Mihai Pătraşcu;Ryan Williams

  • Improving exhaustive search implies superpolynomial lower bounds

    Ryan Williams

  • Faster all-pairs shortest paths via circuit complexity

    Ryan Williams

  • Nonuniform ACC Circuit Lower Bounds

    Ryan Williams

  • Improving Exhaustive Search Implies Superpolynomial Lower Bounds

    Ryan Williams

  • Subcubic Equivalences Between Path, Matrix, and Triangle Problems

    Virginia Vassilevska Williams;R. Ryan Williams

  • More applications of the polynomial method to algorithm design

    Amir Abboud;Ryan Williams;Huacheng Yu

  • Finding, Minimizing, and Counting Weighted Subgraphs

    Virginia Vassilevska Williams;Ryan Williams

  • Probabilistic Polynomials and Hamming Nearest Neighbors

    Josh Alman;Ryan Williams

  • Finding, minimizing, and counting weighted subgraphs

    Virginia Vassilevska;Ryan Williams

  • Simulating branching programs with edit distance and friends: or: a polylog shaved is a lower bound made

    Amir Abboud;Thomas Dueholm Hansen;Virginia Vassilevska Williams;Ryan Williams

  • Regularity Lemmas and Combinatorial Algorithms

    Nikhil Bansal;Ryan Williams

  • Deterministic APSP, orthogonal vectors, and more: quickly derandomizing razborov-smolensky

    Timothy M. Chan;Ryan Williams

  • Limits and Applications of Group Algebras for Parameterized Problems

    Ioannis Koutis;Ryan Williams

  • A new algorithm for optimal constraint satisfaction and its implications

    Ryan Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Raphael Yuster
Raphael Yuster University of Haifa
Timothy M. Chan
Timothy M. Chan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Samuel R. Buss
Samuel R. Buss University of California, San Diego
Nikhil Bansal
Nikhil Bansal University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Daniel M. Kane
Daniel M. Kane University of California, San Diego
Lane A. Hemaspaandra
Lane A. Hemaspaandra University of Rochester
Jan Vondrák
Jan Vondrák Stanford University
Carla P. Gomes
Carla P. Gomes Cornell University
Russell Impagliazzo
Russell Impagliazzo University of California, San Diego
Bart Selman
Bart Selman Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring an online Computer Science degree opens doors to a broad range of educational and career pathways. Many college with low gpa options make it easier for students with varying academic backgrounds to start their CS journey.

If advancing quickly is a priority, consider enrolling in an accelerated cs degree program, which allows you to earn your qualifications in less time. Alternatively, those interested in applying technical skills to environmental challenges could look into an environmental engineering degree online, combining flexibility with real-world impact.

Graduates with these diverse online degrees are well-positioned for high-demand jobs. For instance, if your interest also extends to environmental fields, there are many high-paying jobs with environmental science degree that blend technology and sustainability. Whether your passion lies in coding, engineering, or environmental innovation, online study options offer flexible, accessible ways to launch or advance your career.

Best Scientists Citing Ryan Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles