World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
77
Citations
33880
World Ranking
1239
National Ranking
657

Bart Selman publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Selman sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 263 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Bart Selman D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bart Selman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2012 - ACM Fellow For contributions to artificial intelligence with applications to automated reasoning and planning.
  • 2002 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 2000 - Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) For significant contributions to the field of knowledge representation and reasoning, and the development of widely used randomized methods in reasoning, search, and planning.
  • 1999 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Bart Selman is affiliated with Cornell University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Computer Science, with particular attention to Artificial Intelligence, Statistical and Nonlinear Physics, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Computer Networks and Communications, and Software.

The main topics within their work include AI-based Problem Solving and Planning, Software Engineering Research, Bayesian Modeling and Causal Inference, Machine Learning and Algorithms, Constraint Satisfaction and Optimization, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, and Scheduling and Optimization Algorithms.

Selman has frequently collaborated with a number of co-authors. Notable collaborators include Carla P. Gomes, Niko A. Grupen, Daniel D. Lee, Dieqiao Feng, and Henry Kautz.

They have published extensively, with a noticeable presence in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University) and the Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Other publication venues include IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I Regular Papers, Dagstuhl Research Online Publication Server, and AI Magazine.

Recent publications include:

  • "Cooperative Multi-Agent Fairness and Equivariant Policies" (2022) at Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "From Streamlined Combinatorial Search to Efficient Constructive Procedures" (2021) at Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Solving Hard AI Planning Instances Using Curriculum-Driven Deep Reinforcement Learning" (2020) at arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "A Novel Automated Curriculum Strategy to Solve Hard Sokoban Planning Instances" (2021) at arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Automating Crystal-Structure Phase Mapping: Combining Deep Learning with Constraint Reasoning" (2021) at arXiv (Cornell University)

Bart Selman has received several awards and honors, which include:

  • ACM Fellow (2012) for contributions to artificial intelligence with applications to automated reasoning and planning
  • Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (2002)
  • Fellow of the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI) (2000), recognized for significant contributions to knowledge representation and reasoning and for the development of widely used randomized methods in reasoning, search, and planning
  • Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation (1999)

Best Publications

  • Generating hard satisfiability problems

    Bart Selman;David G. Mitchell;Hector J. Levesque

  • A new method for solving hard satisfiability problems

    Bart Selman;Hector Levesque;David Mitchell

  • Referral Web: combining social networks and collaborative filtering

    Henry Kautz;Bart Selman;Mehul Shah

  • Planning as satisfiability

    Henry Kautz;Bart Selman

  • Hard and easy distributions of SAT problems

    David Mitchell;Bart Selman;Hector Levesque

  • Pushing the envelope: planning, propositional logic, and stochastic search

    Henry Kautz;Bart Selman

  • Noise strategies for improving local search

    Bart Selman;Henry A. Kautz;Brain Cohen

  • Determining computational complexity from characteristic 'phase transitions.'

    Rémi Monasson;Riccardo Zecchina;Scott Kirkpatrick;Bart Selman

  • Local search strategies for satisfiability testing

    Bart Selman;Henry A. Kautz;Bram Cohen

  • Boosting combinatorial search through randomization

    Carla P. Gomes;Bart Selman;Henry Kautz

  • Critical Behavior in the Satisfiability of Random Boolean Expressions

    Scott Kirkpatrick;Bart Selman

  • Unifying SAT-based and graph-based planning

    Henry Kautz;Bart Selman

  • Unstructured human activity detection from RGBD images

    Jaeyong Sung;Colin Ponce;Bart Selman;Ashutosh Saxena

  • Local Search Strategies for Satisfiability Testing

    Bart Selman;Bram Cohen;Henry Kautz

  • Algorithm portfolios

    Carla P. Gomes;Bart Selman

  • Heavy-Tailed Phenomena in Satisfiability and Constraint Satisfaction Problems

    Carla P. Gomes;Bart Selman;Nuno Crato;Henry Kautz

  • Evidence for invariants in local search

    David McAllester;Bart Selman;Henry Kautz

  • The Hidden Web

    Henry A. Kautz;Bart Selman;Mehul A. Shah

  • Domain-independent extensions to GSAT: solving large structured satisfiability problems

    Bart Selman;Henry Kautz

  • Proceedings of the 26th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI'12)

    Joerg Hoffmann;Bart Selman

  • Understanding Batch Normalization

    Johan Bjorck;Carla Gomes;Bart Selman;Kilian Q. Weinberger

Frequent Co-Authors

Carla P. Gomes
Carla P. Gomes Cornell University
Henry Kautz
Henry Kautz University of Virginia
Stefano Ermon
Stefano Ermon Stanford University
Ashish Sabharwal
Ashish Sabharwal Allen Institute for Artificial Intelligence
Eric Horvitz
Eric Horvitz Microsoft (United States)
Hector J. Levesque
Hector J. Levesque University of Toronto
Ashutosh Saxena
Ashutosh Saxena Cornell University
Jörg Hoffmann
Jörg Hoffmann Saarland University
David McAllester
David McAllester Toyota Technological Institute at Chicago
John M. Gregoire
John M. Gregoire California Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees is an excellent way to launch or advance your computer science career from anywhere. Many students start with an associate degree online, which can be completed in as little as six months and covers essential foundational skills. This flexible option is ideal for those eager to enter the workforce quickly or for anyone planning to continue toward a bachelor’s program.

Cost is a key concern for many learners. Seeking out the online business degree cost comparisons—as well as similar research in computer science—can help you identify programs that fit your budget. For those prioritizing affordability, researching the cheapest online college bachelor degree options ensures you receive a quality education without overwhelming debt.

If your interests lie in applied technology, pursuing an online engineer degree can open doors to lucrative industries like robotics, software design, and data analytics. Online learning offers the flexibility and accessibility you need to build a successful tech career—on your own terms.

Best Scientists Citing Bart Selman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles