World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 80 143 83 495 35324

Peter C. Fishburn publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Peter C. Fishburn between 1964 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Peter C. Fishburn published across 56 years, from 1964 to 2019, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 1982. 1 of the 567 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1964 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 1982. 1964: 1 publication 1965: 6 publications 1966: 8 publications 1967: 8 publications 1968: 5 publications 1969: 5 publications 1970: 13 publications 1971: 10 publications 1972: 11 publications 1973: 11 publications 1974: 20 publications 1975: 14 publications 1976: 17 publications 1977: 11 publications 1978: 15 publications 1979: 13 publications 1980: 13 publications 1981: 12 publications 1982: 25 publications 1983: 18 publications 1984: 22 publications 1985: 13 publications 1986: 22 publications 1987: 15 publications 1988: 15 publications 1989: 17 publications 1990: 23 publications 1991: 16 publications 1992: 24 publications 1993: 13 publications 1994: 13 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 16 publications 1997: 15 publications 1998: 10 publications 1999: 12 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 15 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 3 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 1 publication 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 17 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication
1964 2019

567 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Peter C. Fishburn: publications per year, 1964 to 2019
Year Publications
1964 1
1965 6
1966 8
1967 8
1968 5
1969 5
1970 13
1971 10
1972 11
1973 11
1974 20
1975 14
1976 17
1977 11
1978 15
1979 13
1980 13
1981 12
1982 25
1983 18
1984 22
1985 13
1986 22
1987 15
1988 15
1989 17
1990 23
1991 16
1992 24
1993 13
1994 13
1995 13
1996 16
1997 15
1998 10
1999 12
2000 11
2001 15
2002 8
2003 7
2004 3
2005 1
2006 3
2007 0
2008 1
2009 1
2010 1
2011 2
2012 0
2013 1
2014 0
2015 17
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
Total 567
Download as CSV

Peter C. Fishburn publications per year - data summary

  • Peter C. Fishburn, a Mathematics scholar from AT&T (United States), has 567 publications recorded across 56 years, from 1964 to 2019.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1964 and the most recent to 2019.
  • The most productive year is 1982, with 25 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1964, 2005, 2008, 2009 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 6 of the 56 years in the span carry no publications at all (2007, 2012, 2014, 2016 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 10.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 11.3 per year counting only the 50 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2015-2019) hold 18 publications, 3% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1964-1982: 218 publications (11.5 per year); 1983-2001: 303 publications (15.9 per year); 2002-2019: 46 publications (2.6 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is declining.

Peter C. Fishburn publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Fishburn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 492–496 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 495 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5 495
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Peter C. Fishburn publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Peter C. Fishburn, a Mathematics scholar from AT&T (United States), records 495 publications - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Peter C. Fishburn, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Peter C. Fishburn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Peter C. Fishburn D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Fishburn sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 80 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12 80
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Peter C. Fishburn D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Peter C. Fishburn, a Mathematics scholar from AT&T (United States), records 80 D-Index - the 96th percentile of the discipline.
  • 96% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Peter C. Fishburn, and about 4% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Peter C. Fishburn ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
  • 1996 - INFORMS John von Neumann Theory Prize
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1974 - Fellows of the Econometric Society

Overview

Peter C. Fishburn was affiliated with AT&T in the United States. Their career encompassed work primarily focused on research within the field of operations research and related areas.

During their professional life, Fishburn received several recognitions. These included being named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2002, and the INFORMS John von Neumann Theory Prize in 1996. Earlier honors included becoming a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1995 and a Fellow of the Econometric Society in 1974.

While detailed publication records such as frequent co-authors and specific publication venues were not documented, Fishburn's acknowledged impact is reflected in their awards and affiliations.

The scientist's work largely involved theoretical contributions in the field of operations research and management sciences, as indicated by their connection to INFORMS and the John von Neumann Theory Prize.

Best Publications

  • Utility theory for decision making

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead

    Jyrki Wallenius;James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years

    James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer;Jyrki Wallenius

  • Condorcet Social Choice Functions

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Decision and value theory

    Peter C Fishburn

  • Interval orders and interval graphs

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Nonlinear preference and utility theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Exceptional Paper—Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Nontransitive measurable utility.

    Peter C Fishburn

  • TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS*

    Peter C. Fishburn;Gary A. Kochenberger

  • The foundations of expected utility

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY

    P C Fishburn

  • Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals

    Peter C Fishburn

  • Decision and value theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Utility Theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Interval Orders and Interval Graphs: A Study of Partially Ordered Sets

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Methods of Estimating Additive Utilities

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Letter to the Editor—Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Foundations of Measurement:@@@Volume II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations@@@Volume III: Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance.

    Peter C. Fishburn;Patrick Suppes;David H. Krantz;R. Duncan Luce

  • Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.

    Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph L. Keeney;Howard Raiffa

  • Decision and Value Theory

    Bertil Näslund;Peter C. Fishburn

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred S. Roberts
Fred S. Roberts Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William T. Trotter
William T. Trotter Georgia Institute of Technology
Andrew M. Odlyzko
Andrew M. Odlyzko University of Minnesota
Jeffrey C. Lagarias
Jeffrey C. Lagarias University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
R. Duncan Luce
R. Duncan Luce University of California, Irvine
Paul Erdös
Paul Erdös Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Ralph L. Keeney
Ralph L. Keeney Duke University
Stanley Zionts
Stanley Zionts University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Ralph E. Steuer
Ralph E. Steuer University of Georgia
Jyrki Wallenius
Jyrki Wallenius Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to various career opportunities and further education options. For professionals looking to blend quantitative skills with business acumen, exploring the easiest online MBA can provide a flexible path to leadership roles without overwhelming one’s schedule.

Those aiming for high-level research or consulting roles might consider a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA). Discovering the cheapest DBA online programs can make this advanced degree more accessible without sacrificing quality.

For graduates interested specifically in finance, combining mathematical expertise with financial strategy is invaluable. Many students opt for online masters in finance programs to gain specialized skills in investment, risk management, and financial analytics.

Time efficiency is critical for busy professionals. The shortest online MBA programs offer accelerated learning opportunities, enabling students to quickly advance their careers while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Fishburn

Recently Published Articles