World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
80
Citations
35324
World Ranking
143
National Ranking
82

Peter C. Fishburn publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Fishburn sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 495 publications — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Peter C. Fishburn D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter C. Fishburn sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 80 D-Index — 96th percentile

96% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2002 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)
  • 1996 - INFORMS John von Neumann Theory Prize
  • 1995 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)
  • 1974 - Fellows of the Econometric Society

Overview

Peter C. Fishburn was affiliated with AT&T in the United States. Their career encompassed work primarily focused on research within the field of operations research and related areas.

During their professional life, Fishburn received several recognitions. These included being named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2002, and the INFORMS John von Neumann Theory Prize in 1996. Earlier honors included becoming a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1995 and a Fellow of the Econometric Society in 1974.

While detailed publication records such as frequent co-authors and specific publication venues were not documented, Fishburn's acknowledged impact is reflected in their awards and affiliations.

The scientist's work largely involved theoretical contributions in the field of operations research and management sciences, as indicated by their connection to INFORMS and the John von Neumann Theory Prize.

Best Publications

  • Utility theory for decision making

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Mean-Risk Analysis with Risk Associated with Below-Target Returns

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: Recent Accomplishments and What Lies Ahead

    Jyrki Wallenius;James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer

  • Multiple Criteria Decision Making, Multiattribute Utility Theory: The Next Ten Years

    James S. Dyer;Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph E. Steuer;Jyrki Wallenius

  • Condorcet Social Choice Functions

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Decision and value theory

    Peter C Fishburn

  • Interval orders and interval graphs

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Nonlinear preference and utility theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Exceptional Paper—Lexicographic Orders, Utilities and Decision Rules: A Survey

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Nontransitive measurable utility.

    Peter C Fishburn

  • TWO‐PIECE VON NEUMANN‐MORGENSTERN UTILITY FUNCTIONS*

    Peter C. Fishburn;Gary A. Kochenberger

  • The foundations of expected utility

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • LEXICOGRAPHIC ORDERS, UTILITIES AND DECISION RULES: A SURVEY

    P C Fishburn

  • Intransitive indifference with unequal indifference intervals

    Peter C Fishburn

  • Decision and value theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Utility Theory

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Interval Orders and Interval Graphs: A Study of Partially Ordered Sets

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Methods of Estimating Additive Utilities

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Letter to the Editor—Additive Utilities with Incomplete Product Sets: Application to Priorities and Assignments

    Peter C. Fishburn

  • Foundations of Measurement:@@@Volume II: Geometrical, Threshold, and Probabilistic Representations@@@Volume III: Representation, Axiomatization, and Invariance.

    Peter C. Fishburn;Patrick Suppes;David H. Krantz;R. Duncan Luce

  • Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs.

    Peter C. Fishburn;Ralph L. Keeney;Howard Raiffa

  • Decision and Value Theory

    Bertil Näslund;Peter C. Fishburn

Frequent Co-Authors

Fred S. Roberts
Fred S. Roberts Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
William T. Trotter
William T. Trotter Georgia Institute of Technology
Andrew M. Odlyzko
Andrew M. Odlyzko University of Minnesota
Jeffrey C. Lagarias
Jeffrey C. Lagarias University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
R. Duncan Luce
R. Duncan Luce University of California, Irvine
Paul Erdös
Paul Erdös Hungarian Academy of Sciences
Ralph L. Keeney
Ralph L. Keeney Duke University
Stanley Zionts
Stanley Zionts University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Ralph E. Steuer
Ralph E. Steuer University of Georgia
Jyrki Wallenius
Jyrki Wallenius Aalto University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Mathematics degree in the USA opens doors to various career opportunities and further education options. For professionals looking to blend quantitative skills with business acumen, exploring the easiest online MBA can provide a flexible path to leadership roles without overwhelming one’s schedule.

Those aiming for high-level research or consulting roles might consider a Doctor of Business Administration (DBA). Discovering the cheapest DBA online programs can make this advanced degree more accessible without sacrificing quality.

For graduates interested specifically in finance, combining mathematical expertise with financial strategy is invaluable. Many students opt for online masters in finance programs to gain specialized skills in investment, risk management, and financial analytics.

Time efficiency is critical for busy professionals. The shortest online MBA programs offer accelerated learning opportunities, enabling students to quickly advance their careers while balancing other commitments.

Best Scientists Citing Peter C. Fishburn

Recently Published Articles