World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Bernard De Baets

Bernard De Baets

Award Badge
Computer Science
Belgium
2026
Award Badge
Mathematics
Belgium
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 82 125 104 2 2 920 25283
Computer Science 83 906 875 10 10 1007 25430

Bernard De Baets publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bernard De Baets between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bernard De Baets published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 38 papers a year. Output peaked at 88 publications in 2010. 36 of the 1,329 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 88. Peak 88 publications in 2010. 1992: 2 publications 1993: 8 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 19 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 20 publications 1998: 15 publications 1999: 18 publications 2000: 13 publications 2001: 22 publications 2002: 39 publications 2003: 40 publications 2004: 30 publications 2005: 30 publications 2006: 35 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 63 publications 2009: 63 publications 2010: 88 publications 2011: 71 publications 2012: 66 publications 2013: 58 publications 2014: 37 publications 2015: 47 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 52 publications 2018: 47 publications 2019: 52 publications 2020: 46 publications 2021: 54 publications 2022: 51 publications 2023: 41 publications 2024: 54 publications 2025: 34 publications 2026: 2 publications
1992 2026

1,329 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bernard De Baets: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 2
1993 8
1994 11
1995 19
1996 14
1997 20
1998 15
1999 18
2000 13
2001 22
2002 39
2003 40
2004 30
2005 30
2006 35
2007 43
2008 63
2009 63
2010 88
2011 71
2012 66
2013 58
2014 37
2015 47
2016 44
2017 52
2018 47
2019 52
2020 46
2021 54
2022 51
2023 41
2024 54
2025 34
2026 2
Total 1,329
Download as CSV

Bernard De Baets publications per year - data summary

  • Bernard De Baets, a Mathematics scholar from Ghent University, has 1,329 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2010, with 88 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992 and 2026, with 2 publications each.
  • The rate of publication averages 38.0 papers per year over the whole span, or 38.0 per year counting only the 35 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 182 publications, 14% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 221 publications (18.4 per year); 2004-2015: 631 publications (52.6 per year); 2016-2026: 477 publications (43.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Bernard De Baets publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard De Baets sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 537+ publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 920 publications — 99th percentile

99% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100 920
Download as CSV

Bernard De Baets publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Bernard De Baets, a Mathematics scholar from Ghent University, records 920 publications - the 99th percentile of the discipline.
  • 99% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Bernard De Baets, and about 1% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Bernard De Baets ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Bernard De Baets D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bernard De Baets sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 97th percentile

97% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5 82
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Bernard De Baets D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Bernard De Baets, a Mathematics scholar from Ghent University, records 82 D-Index - the 97th percentile of the discipline.
  • 97% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Bernard De Baets, and about 3% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Bernard De Baets ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Computer Science in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2026 - Research.com Mathematics in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Mathematics in Belgium Leader Award
  • 2023 - Research.com Mathematics in Belgium Leader Award

Overview

Bernard De Baets is affiliated with Ghent University in Belgium and has an extensive publication record primarily focused on computer science. Their research contributions span multiple subfields including Computational Theory and Mathematics, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Molecular Biology, and Management Science and Operations Research.

Their published works demonstrate a broad engagement with topics such as Advanced Algebra and Logic, Rough Sets and Fuzzy Logic, Cellular Automata and Applications, Multi-Criteria Decision Making, Fuzzy and Soft Set Theory, DNA and Biological Computing, and Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques.

Bernard De Baets has published in various academic venues, frequently contributing to:

  • Fuzzy Sets and Systems
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Information Sciences
  • Information Fusion

Notable recent papers include:

  • "Predicting bacteriophage hosts based on sequences of annotated receptor-binding proteins," 2021, Scientific Reports
  • "Equivalent Electrical Circuits and Their Use Across Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy Application Domains," 2022, IEEE Access
  • "Crowdsourced mapping of unexplored target space of kinase inhibitors," 2021, Nature Communications
  • "Hybrid differential equations: Integrating mechanistic and data-driven techniques for modelling of water systems," 2022, Water Research
  • "Deep feature fusion through adaptive discriminative metric learning for scene recognition," 2020, Information Fusion

The scientist frequently collaborates with a number of co-authors, including:

  • Michiel Stock
  • Jan Baetens
  • Barbara Wolnik
  • Raúl Pérez-Fernández
  • Dimitri Boeckaerts

Bernard De Baets's research integrates both theoretical and applied aspects of computer science, demonstrating interdisciplinary connections particularly to molecular biology and data-driven methods. Their work involves both mechanistic modeling and advanced computational techniques, contributing to fields that involve complex system analysis and decision-making processes.

Best Publications

  • Present limitations and future prospects of stable isotope methods for nitrate source identification in surface- and groundwater.

    Dongmei Xue;Jorin Botte;Bernard De Baets;Frederik Accoe

  • Genome analysis of the smallest free-living eukaryote Ostreococcus tauri unveils many unique features

    Evelyne Derelle;Conchita Ferraz;Stephane Rombauts;Pierre Rouzé

  • A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationships

    Humberto Bustince;Edurne Barrenechea;Miguel Pagola;Javier Fernandez

  • The functional equations of Frank and Alsina for uninorms and nullnorms

    Tomasa Calvo;Bernard De Baets;János Fodor

  • Random forests as a tool for ecohydrological distribution modelling

    Jan Peters;Bernard De Baets;Niko E.C. Verhoest;Roeland Samson

  • Fuzzy rule-based models for decision support in ecosystem management.

    Veronique Adriaenssens;Bernard De Baets;Peter L.M. Goethals;Niels De Pauw

  • Triangular norms on product lattices

    Bernard De Baets;Radko Mesiar

  • Multivariate return periods in hydrology: a critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation

    B. Gräler;M. J. van den Berg;S. Vandenberghe;A. Petroselli

  • Use of a Bayesian isotope mixing model to estimate proportional contributions of multiple nitrate sources in surface water

    Dongmei Xue;Bernard De Baets;Oswald Van Cleemput;Carmel Hennessy

  • Fast and accurate center of gravity defuzzification of fuzzy system outputs defined on trapezoidal fuzzy partitions

    Ester Van Broekhoven;Bernard De Baets

  • Ecological Diversity: Measuring the Unmeasurable

    Aisling J. Daly;Jan M. Baetens;Bernard De Baets

  • A sub‐pixel mapping algorithm based on sub‐pixel/pixel spatial attraction models

    Koen C. Mertens;Bernard de Baets;Lieven P. C. Verbeke;Robert R. de Wulf

  • Bacterial species identification from MALDI-TOF mass spectra through data analysis and machine learning.

    Katrien De Bruyne;Bram Slabbinck;Willem Waegeman;Paul Vauterin

  • Mobile monitoring for mapping spatial variation in urban air quality: Development and validation of a methodology based on an extensive dataset

    Joris Van den Bossche;Joris Van den Bossche;Jan Peters;Jan Verwaeren;Dick Botteldooren

  • Dietary species richness as a measure of food biodiversity and nutritional quality of diets.

    Carl Lachat;Jessica E. Raneri;Jessica E. Raneri;Katherine Walker Smith;Patrick Kolsteren

  • Residual operators of uninorms

    Bernard De Baets;János C. Fodor

  • Analytical solution methods for fuzzy relational equations.

    Unknown

  • A comparative study of similarity measures

    Xuzhu Wang;B. De Baets;E. Kerre

  • T -partitions

    Bernard de Baets;Radko Mesiar

  • Cyclic evaluation of transitivity of reciprocal relations

    B. De. Baets;H. De. Meyer;B. De. Schuymer

  • Transitivity frameworks for reciprocal relations: cycle-transitivity versus FG-transitivity

    B. De Baets;H. De Meyer

  • Idempotent uninorms

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Niko E. C. Verhoest
Niko E. C. Verhoest Ghent University
Etienne Kerre
Etienne Kerre Ghent University
Radko Mesiar
Radko Mesiar Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava
Tapio Pahikkala
Tapio Pahikkala University of Turku
Dick Botteldooren
Dick Botteldooren Ghent University
Geert Haesaert
Geert Haesaert Ghent University
Marc Leman
Marc Leman Ghent University
Peter A. Vanrolleghem
Peter A. Vanrolleghem Université Laval
Kris Audenaert
Kris Audenaert Ghent University
Yves Van de Peer
Yves Van de Peer Ghent University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those studying Mathematics in the USA, branching into related fields through online degrees offers flexible and valuable career opportunities. Many students consider advanced qualifications like a master of finance online to apply their quantitative skills in financial analysis, investment, and risk management.

Business-minded individuals often explore options to boost their leadership potential quickly by enrolling in fastest online mba programs. These programs provide a swift route to gaining essential business knowledge without pausing professional advancements.

Marketing analytics is another growing field where math graduates excel, especially by pursuing the cheapest online marketing degree, which combines cost-effectiveness with strong earning potential in data-driven marketing roles.

For professionals seeking comprehensive business training, enrolling in one year mba programs offers a balanced approach, allowing them to quickly transition to higher management or specialized analytical roles. These diverse pathways highlight the versatility of mathematics in various lucrative careers.

Best Scientists Citing Bernard De Baets

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles