World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 83 15402 14487 1414 1350 331 34635

David Mant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by David Mant between 1982 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. David Mant published across 43 years, from 1982 to 2024, averaging 7.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2012. 1 of the 335 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2012. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 1 publication 1985: 2 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 9 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 14 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 10 publications 1994: 12 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 6 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 9 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 12 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 31 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 10 publications 2016: 12 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 3 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1982 2024

335 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
David Mant: publications per year, 1982 to 2024
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 1
1985 2
1986 8
1987 9
1988 4
1989 9
1990 14
1991 8
1992 9
1993 10
1994 12
1995 9
1996 1
1997 6
1998 2
1999 9
2000 7
2001 5
2002 12
2003 3
2004 9
2005 9
2006 8
2007 9
2008 10
2009 11
2010 11
2011 15
2012 31
2013 11
2014 24
2015 10
2016 12
2017 12
2018 6
2019 0
2020 2
2021 3
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 335
Download as CSV

David Mant publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Mant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 321–340 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 331 publications — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895 331
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

David Mant D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Mant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 83 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 83
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom
  • Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom

Overview

David Mant is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their academic work primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with significant contributions to Oncology, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

They have published research focusing on a range of medical and scientific topics, including:

  • Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • PARP inhibition in cancer therapy

Their recent published papers include:

  • Long-term Effectiveness of Adjuvant Treatment With Catechol-O-Methyltransferase or Monoamine Oxidase B Inhibitors Compared With Dopamine Agonists Among Patients With Parkinson Disease Uncontrolled by Levodopa Therapy, 2021, published in JAMA Neurology
  • Intratumoural immune signature to identify patients with primary colorectal cancer who do not require follow-up after resection: an observational study, 2021, published in Health Technology Assessment
  • Design and Set Up of a Randomised Controlled Trial of Medicinal Cannabinoids in Recurrent Glioblastoma - The ARISTOCRAT Trial, 2024, published in Neuro-Oncology

David Mant frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their frequent co-authors include Caroline Rick, Alastair Gray, Crispin Jenkinson, Emma McIntosh, and Keith Wheatley, each having co-authored multiple papers alongside them.

Their work has appeared in a variety of publication venues, notably:

  • JAMA Neurology
  • Health Technology Assessment
  • Neuro-Oncology

David Mant has been recognized as a Fellow of The Academy of Medical Sciences, United Kingdom. This honor reflects a professional standing within medical scientific communities.

Best Publications

  • Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

    Lindsay F Stead;Rafael Perera;Christopher Bullen;David Mant

  • Effect of antibiotic prescribing in primary care on antimicrobial resistance in individual patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

    Céire Costelloe;Chris Metcalfe;Andrew Lovering;David Mant

  • Normal ranges of heart rate and respiratory rate in children from birth to 18 years of age: a systematic review of observational studies

    Susannah Fleming;Matthew Thompson;Matthew Thompson;Richard Stevens;Carl Heneghan

  • Change in stroke incidence, mortality, case-fatality, severity, and risk factors in Oxfordshire, UK from 1981 to 2004 (Oxford Vascular Study)

    PM Rothwell;AJ Coull;MF Giles;SC Howard

  • Population-based study of event-rate, incidence, case fatality, and mortality for all acute vascular events in all arterial territories (Oxford Vascular Study)

    PM Rothwell;AJ Coull;LE Silver;JF Fairhead

  • Clinical recognition of meningococcal disease in children and adolescents

    Matthew J Thompson;Nelly Ninis;Rafael Perera;Richard Mayon-White

  • Meta-analysis on efficacy of nicotine replacement therapies in smoking cessation

    C. Silagy;D. Mant;G. Fowler;M. Lodge

  • Large-scale community echocardiographic screening reveals a major burden of undiagnosed valvular heart disease in older people: the OxVALVE Population Cohort Study

    Joanna L. d'Arcy;Sean Coffey;Margaret A. Loudon;Andrew Kennedy

  • Effect of 3 to 5 years of scheduled CEA and CT follow-up to detect recurrence of colorectal cancer: the FACS randomized clinical trial.

    John N. Primrose;Rafael Perera;Alastair Gray;Peter Rose

  • Routine follow up of breast cancer in primary care: randomised trial

    Eva Grunfeld;David Mant;Patricia Yudkin;Ruth Adewuyi-Dalton

  • Systematic review and individual patient data meta-analysis of diagnosis of heart failure, with modelling of implications of different diagnostic strategies in primary care

    Jonathan Mant;J. Doust;A. Roalfe;P. Barton

  • Diagnostic value of laboratory tests in identifying serious infections in febrile children: Systematic review

    A Van Den Bruel;M J Thompson;T Haj-Hassan;R Stevens

  • Nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation

    C Silagy;D Mant;G Fowler;T Lancaster

  • Oral contraceptives and venous thromboembolism: findings in a large prospective study.

    M Vessey;D Mant;A Smith;D Yeates

  • Diagnostic value of clinical features at presentation to identify serious infection in children in developed countries: a systematic review

    Ann Van den Bruel;Tanya Haj-Hassan;Matthew Thompson;Frank Buntinx

  • Dietary Intervention in Primary Care: Validity of the DINE Method for Diet Assessment

    Liane Roe;Clare Strong;Connie Whiteside;Andrew Neil

  • Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Final results of the OXCHECK study

    A Coulter;G Fowler;A Fuller;L Jones

  • Comparison of breast cancer patient satisfaction with follow-up in primary care versus specialist care: results from a randomized controlled trial

    Eva Grunfeld;Ray Fitzpatrick;David Mant;Patricia Yudkin

  • Randomised controlled trial of follow up care in general practice of patients with myocardial infarction and angina: final results of the Southampton heart integrated care project (SHIP)

    Kate Jolly;Fiona Bradley;Stephen Sharp;Helen Smith

  • Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: results of the OXCHECK study after one year

    J Muir;D Mant;L Jones;P Yudkin

Frequent Co-Authors

Rafael Perera
Rafael Perera University of Oxford
Paul Little
Paul Little University of Southampton
Paul Glasziou
Paul Glasziou Bond University
Henriëtte A. Moll
Henriëtte A. Moll Erasmus University Rotterdam
Martin Vessey
Martin Vessey University of Oxford
Derrick W. Crook
Derrick W. Crook University of Oxford
Carl Heneghan
Carl Heneghan University of Oxford
Frank Buntinx
Frank Buntinx KU Leuven
Angela Coulter
Angela Coulter University of Oxford
Tim E. A. Peto
Tim E. A. Peto University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Medicine but seeking flexible learning or alternative routes, online healthcare degrees offer many opportunities. Aspiring nurses can consider online rn to bsn programs no clinicals, which allow registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing without direct patient clinicals—perfect for those balancing work and studies.

Those aiming for advanced nursing leadership roles may explore the fastest dnp online program options to quickly obtain a Doctor of Nursing Practice. Additionally, students seeking less rigorous paths can look for the easiest dnp program online to streamline their education while still achieving a high-level credential.

If you want to start your nursing career sooner, you may be wondering, what is the fastest way to become an lpn? Fast-track online LPN programs provide accelerated options to get you into the workforce quickly.

These online degrees and career pathways can open doors, increase flexibility, and make a medical career more accessible for aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing David Mant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles