World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jonathan S.T. Sham

Jonathan S.T. Sham

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
84
Citations
18828
World Ranking
15322
National Ranking
172

Jonathan S.T. Sham publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S.T. Sham sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 222 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Jonathan S.T. Sham D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jonathan S.T. Sham sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 84 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jonathan S.T. Sham is affiliated with the University of Hong Kong in China. Their research primarily focuses on the field of Medicine, with specific attention to subfields including Otorhinolaryngology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Oncology.

Their work covers several main topics within these fields, including:

  • Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Head and Neck Surgical Oncology
  • Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Lung Cancer Research Studies

Jonathan S.T. Sham has contributed to scholarly literature with recently published papers such as:

  • Role of chemotherapy in patients with nasopharynx carcinoma treated with radiotherapy (MAC-NPC): an updated individual patient data network meta-analysis, 2023, The Lancet Oncology
  • Meta-analysis of chemotherapy in nasopharynx carcinoma (MAC-NPC): An update on 26 trials and 7080 patients, 2021, Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

Frequent co-authors in their research include:

  • Jun Ma
  • Benjamin Lacas
  • Wai Tong Ng
  • Anthony T.-C. Chan
  • Ming-Yuan Chen

Their publications have appeared in notable venues such as:

  • The Lancet Oncology
  • Clinical and Translational Radiation Oncology

Best Publications

  • Xerostomia and quality of life after intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs. conventional radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: initial report on a randomized controlled clinical trial.

    Edmond H.N. Pow;Dora L.W. Kwong;Anne S. McMillan;May C.M. Wong

  • Preliminary Results of a Randomized Study on Therapeutic Gain by Concurrent Chemotherapy for Regionally-Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: NPC-9901 Trial by the Hong Kong Nasopharyngeal Cancer Study Group

    Anne W.M. Lee;W.H. Lau;Stewart Y. Tung;Daniel T.T. Chua

  • Preliminary report of the asian-oceanian clinical oncology association randomized trial comparing cisplatin and epirubicin followed by radiotherapy versus radiotherapy alone in the treatment of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Daniel T. T. Chua;Jonathan S. T. Sham;Damon Choy;Virchan Lorvidhaya

  • Concurrent and adjuvant chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a factorial study.

    Dora L.W. Kwong;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Gordon K.H. Au;Daniel T.T. Chua

  • Intensity-modulated radiotherapy for early-stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study on disease control and preservation of salivary function.

    Dora L. W. Kwong;Edmond H. N. Pow;Jonathan S. T. Sham;Anne S. McMillan

  • Association of Vimentin overexpression and hepatocellular carcinoma metastasis

    Liang Hu;Sze Hang Lau;Chi Hung Tzang;Jian Ming Wen

  • Long-Term Survival After Cisplatin-Based Induction Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Pooled Data Analysis of Two Phase III Trials

    Daniel T.T. Chua;Jun Ma;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Hai Qiang Mai

  • Prognostic factors of nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a review of 759 patients.

    Jonathan S. T. Sham;D. Choy

  • Prognostic value of epidermal growth factor receptor expression in patients with advanced stage nasopharyngeal carcinoma treated with induction chemotherapy and radiotherapy

    Daniel T.T Chua;John M Nicholls;Jonathan S.T Sham;Gordon K.H Au

  • New approach to the nasopharynx: The maxillary swing approach

    William L. Wei;Kam H. Lam;Jonathan S. T. Sham

  • Volumetric analysis of tumor extent in nasopharyngeal carcinoma and correlation with treatment outcome

    Daniel T.T. Chua;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Dora L.W. Kwong;K.S. Tai

  • Sensorineural hearing loss in patients treated for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a prospective study of the effect of radiation and cisplatin treatment.

    Dora L.W. Kwong;William I. Wei;Jonathan S.T. Sham;W.K. Ho

  • Preliminary results of radiation dose escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

    Dora L.W. Kwong;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Lucullus H.T. Leung;Ashley C.K. Cheng

  • Improvement in treatment results and long-term survival of patients with esophageal cancer: impact of chemoradiation and change in treatment strategy.

    Simon Law;Dora L.M. Kwong;Ka-Fai Kwok;Kam-Ho Wong

  • Nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Orderly neck node spread

    Jonathan S.T. Sham;D. Choy;W.I. Wei

  • Isolation of a novel candidate oncogene within a frequently amplified region at 3q26 in ovarian cancer.

    Xin Yuan Guan;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Terence C.M. Tang;Yan Fang

  • Preliminary results of a randomized study (NPC-9902 Trial) on therapeutic gain by concurrent chemotherapy and/or accelerated fractionation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

    Anne W M Lee;Stewart Y. Tung;Anthony T C Chan;Rick Chappell

  • Survival outcome of patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma with first local failure: A study by the Hong Kong nasopharyngeal carcinoma study group

    Kwok Hung Yu;Sing-fai Leung;Stewart Yuk Tung;Benny Chung-ying Zee

  • Evidence of Cisplatin-induced Senescent-like Growth Arrest in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Cells

    Xianghong Wang;Stephen C. H. Wong;Jie Pan;S. W. Tsao

  • Recurrent chromosome alterations in hepatocellular carcinoma detected by comparative genomic hybridization.

    Xin-Yuan Guan;Yan Fang;Jonathan S.T. Sham;Dora L.W. Kwong

Frequent Co-Authors

William I. Wei
William I. Wei University of Hong Kong
Xin Yuan Guan
Xin Yuan Guan University of Hong Kong
Dan Xie
Dan Xie Sun Yat-sen University
John M. Nicholls
John M. Nicholls University of Hong Kong
Meng-Chao Wu
Meng-Chao Wu Second Military Medical University
Sai Wah Tsao
Sai Wah Tsao University of Hong Kong
Cecilia L. W. Chan
Cecilia L. W. Chan University of Hong Kong
Bo-Jian Zheng
Bo-Jian Zheng University of Hong Kong
Xinyuan Liu
Xinyuan Liu Southern University of Science and Technology
Jeffrey M. Trent
Jeffrey M. Trent Translational Genomics Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Many students interested in studying Medicine in the USA explore related healthcare fields that offer flexible study options. Online nursing degrees are increasingly popular, providing accessible and affordable routes into rewarding medical careers. Programs like cheapest online acute care nurse practitioner programs train future nurse practitioners to work in specialized, fast-paced environments where skilled care is in high demand.

Those seeking a traditional pathway can consider enrolling in an online nursing school, which can provide foundational clinical skills and knowledge. For registered nurses aiming to advance their credentials, options such as the cheapest rn to bsn online programs allow working professionals to earn a bachelor’s degree with minimal interruption to their careers.

Ambitious professionals focused on leadership or research roles can pursue an online nursing doctorate. These advanced degrees open opportunities in academia, management, and policy. Exploring these pathways is a smart way to access dynamic and diverse careers in healthcare, especially through flexible and cost-effective online learning.

Best Scientists Citing Jonathan S.T. Sham

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles