World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
28910
World Ranking
16484
National Ranking
1505

Angela Coulter publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Coulter sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 274 publications — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Angela Coulter D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Angela Coulter sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Angela Coulter is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Health Professions and Medicine, with a particular focus on General Health Professions, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Health Information Management, and Epidemiology.

Their work covers a range of topics including Primary Care and Health Outcomes, Healthcare cost, quality, and practices, Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Healthcare Systems and Challenges, Cancer survivorship and care, and Global Cancer Incidence and Screening.

Among their recent publications are several papers across various reputable journals. These include:

  • "What Works in Implementing Patient Decision Aids in Routine Clinical Settings? A Rapid Realist Review and Update from the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration," 2020, Medical Decision Making
  • "LSE-Lancet Commission on the future of the NHS: re-laying the foundations for an equitable and efficient health and care service after COVID-19," 2021, The Lancet
  • "Qualitative and quantitative approach to assess the potential for automating administrative tasks in general practice," 2020, BMJ Open
  • "Satisfaction with care and adherence to treatment when using patient reported outcomes to individualize follow-up care for women with early breast cancer - a pilot randomized controlled trial," 2020, Acta Oncologica
  • "Care during covid-19 must be humane and person centred," 2020, BMJ

Coulter has frequently published in journals such as BMJ, Medical Decision Making, The Lancet, BMJ Open, and the Journal of Cancer Survivorship.

Frequently collaborating with other researchers, Coulter's frequent co-authors include Karina Dahl Steffensen, Tessa Richards, Pernille Tine Jensen, Clement C. Zai, and Natalie Joseph-Williams.

Best Publications

  • Developing a quality criteria framework for patient decision aids: online international Delphi consensus process

    Glyn Elwyn;Annette O'Connor;Dawn Stacey;Robert Volk

  • Short form 36 (SF36) health survey questionnaire: normative data for adults of working age.

    C Jenkinson;A Coulter;L Wright

  • Implementing shared decision making in the NHS

    Glyn Elwyn;Steve Laitner;Angela Coulter;Emma Walker

  • Patients’ experiences and satisfaction with health care: results of a questionnaire study of specific aspects of care

    Crispin Jenkinson;A. Coulter;S. Bruster;N. Richards

  • Sharing decisions with patients: is the information good enough?

    Angela Coulter;Vikki Entwistle;David Gilbert

  • Paternalism or partnership?: Patients have grown up—and there's no going back

    Angela Coulter

  • Effectiveness of strategies for informing, educating, and involving patients

    Angela Coulter;Jo Ellins

  • Personalised care planning for adults with chronic or long-term health conditions

    Angela Coulter;Vikki A Entwistle;Abi Eccles;Sara Ryan

  • Patient safety: what about the patient?

    C A Vincent;A Coulter

  • The epidemiology of hysterectomy: Findings in a large cohort study

    M.P. Vessey;L Villard-Mackintosh;K McPherson;A Coulter

  • Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision-making.

    Angela Coulter

  • Assessing the Quality of Decision Support Technologies Using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi)

    Glyn Elwyn;Annette M. O'Connor;Carol Bennett;Robert Gordon Newcombe

  • The Picker Patient Experience Questionnaire: development and validation using data from in-patient surveys in five countries

    Crispin Jenkinson;Angela Coulter;Stephen Bruster

  • A systematic development process for patient decision aids

    Angela Coulter;Diana Stilwell;Jennifer Kryworuchko;Patricia Dolan Mullen

  • Patient engagement--what works?

    Angela Coulter

  • Collecting data on patient experience is not enough: they must be used to improve care

    Angela Coulter;Louise Locock;Sue Ziebland;Joe Calabrese

  • Criterion validity and reliability of the SF-36 in a population sample.

    C. Jenkinson;L. Wright;A. Coulter

  • The European Patient Of The Future

    Angela Coulter;Helen Magee

  • Effectiveness of health checks conducted by nurses in primary care: Final results of the OXCHECK study

    A Coulter;G Fowler;A Fuller;L Jones

  • European patients' views on the responsiveness of health systems and healthcare providers.

    Angela Coulter;Crispin Jenkinson

Frequent Co-Authors

Crispin Jenkinson
Crispin Jenkinson University of Oxford
Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Vikki Entwistle
Vikki Entwistle University of Aberdeen
David Mant
David Mant University of Oxford
Glyn Elwyn
Glyn Elwyn Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice
Alastair Gray
Alastair Gray University of Oxford
Margaret Thorogood
Margaret Thorogood University of Warwick
Sue Ziebland
Sue Ziebland University of Oxford
Andy Haines
Andy Haines London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Elizabeth Murray
Elizabeth Murray University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA also means considering alternative and flexible pathways into healthcare. One popular route for registered nurses to advance their careers is through affordable rn to bsn programs, which allow nurses to earn a bachelor’s degree online at a reasonable cost. These programs are ideal for working professionals looking to enhance their skills and eligibility for more advanced roles.

For individuals with a non-nursing background interested in making a transition, there are also direct entry msn programs for non-nursing majors. These accelerated online programs open new doors into advanced nursing positions, even if your undergraduate degree is in another field.

Want to begin your healthcare journey sooner? Consider nursing schools with high acceptance rates that may offer an easier admission process, helping you get started quickly.

If the clinical route isn’t for you, opportunities also abound in healthcare administration. Explore online medical billing and coding with financial aid for a fast track to a vital non-clinical role—often with flexible, fully online study options.

Best Scientists Citing Angela Coulter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles