World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Michael Schreckenberg

Michael Schreckenberg

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
64
Citations
23464
World Ranking
1600
National Ranking
43

Michael Schreckenberg publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schreckenberg sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 236 publications — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Michael Schreckenberg D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Michael Schreckenberg sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Overview

Michael Schreckenberg is affiliated with the University of Duisburg-Essen in Germany and has contributed extensively to the field of engineering, with a focus on control and systems engineering, transportation, building and construction, economics and econometrics, and statistical and nonlinear physics.

Their research encompasses a range of topics including traffic control and management, traffic prediction and management techniques, transportation planning and optimization, complex systems and time series analysis, complex network analysis techniques, autonomous vehicle technology and safety, as well as mental health research topics.

Recent publications authored or co-authored by Michael Schreckenberg include:

  • Adapting a cellular automata model to describe heterogeneous traffic with human-driven, automated, and communicating automated vehicles, 2021, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Modelling multi-lane heterogeneous traffic flow with human-driven, automated, and communicating automated vehicles, 2021, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Quasi-stationary states in temporal correlations for traffic systems: Cologne orbital motorway as an example, 2020, Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
  • Spatial correlation analysis of traffic flow on parallel motorways in Germany, 2022, Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Collective behavior in the North Rhine-Westphalia motorway network, 2021, Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment

Frequent co-authors with whom Schreckenberg has collaborated include:

  • Thomas Guhr
  • Shanshan Wang
  • Sebastian Gartzke
  • Sergey L. Klenov
  • Boris S. Kerner

Key venues where Michael Schreckenberg has published are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physica A Statistical Mechanics and its Applications
  • Journal of Statistical Mechanics Theory and Experiment
  • Collective Dynamics
  • European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging

Best Publications

  • A cellular automaton model for freeway traffic

    Kai Nagel;Michael Schreckenberg

  • Pedestrian and evacuation dynamics

    Michael Schreckenberg;Som Deo Sharma

  • Metastable states in cellular automata for traffic flow

    R. Barlovic;L. Santen;A. Schadschneider;M. Schreckenberg

  • Discrete stochastic models for traffic flow

    M. Schreckenberg;M. Schreckenberg;A. Schadschneider;A. Schadschneider;K. Nagel;K. Nagel;N. Ito;N. Ito

  • Two lane traffic simulations using cellular automata

    M. Rickert;M. Rickert;K. Nagel;M. Schreckenberg;A. Latour

  • Traffic and Granular Flow

    D E Wolf;M Schreckenberg;A Bachem

  • Optimizing traffic lights in a cellular automaton model for city traffic.

    Elmar Brockfeld;Robert Barlovic;Andreas Schadschneider;Michael Schreckenberg

  • Particle hopping models for two-lane traffic with two kinds of vehicles: Effects of lane-changing rules

    Debashish Chowdhury;Dietrich E. Wolf;Michael Schreckenberg

  • Cellular automation models and traffic flow

    A Schadschneider;M Schreckenberg

  • Microscopic Simulation of Urban Traffic Based on Cellular Automata

    J. Esser;M. Schreckenberg

  • Single-vehicle data of highway traffic: a statistical analysis.

    L. Neubert;L. Santen;A. Schadschneider;M. Schreckenberg

  • Experimental study of pedestrian flow through a bottleneck

    Tobias Kretz;Anna Grünebohm;Michael Schreckenberg

  • Traffic and granular flow '99 : social, traffic, and granular dynamics

    Granular Flow;Dirk Helbing;Hans J. Herrmann

  • Granular and Traffic Flow ’99: Social, Traffic, and Granular Dynamics

    Dirk Helbing;Hans J. Herrmann;Michael Schreckenberg;Dietrich E. Wolf

  • Simulation of competitive egress behavior: comparison with aircraft evacuation data

    Ansgar Kirchner;Hubert Klüpfel;Katsuhiro Nishinari;Katsuhiro Nishinari;Andreas Schadschneider

  • Mechanical restriction versus human overreaction triggering congested traffic states.

    Hyun Keun Lee;Robert Barlovic;Michael Schreckenberg;Doochul Kim

  • Decision dynamics in a traffic scenario

    Joachim Wahle;Ana Lúcia C Bazzan;Franziska Klügl;Michael Schreckenberg

  • Experimental study of pedestrian counterflow in a corridor

    Tobias Kretz;Anna Grünebohm;Maike Kaufman;Florian Mazur

  • Discretization effects and the influence of walking speed in cellular automata models for pedestrian dynamics

    Ansgar Kirchner;Ansgar Kirchner;Hubert Klüpfel;Katsuhiro Nishinari;Katsuhiro Nishinari;Andreas Schadschneider

  • The impact of real-time information in a two-route scenario using agent-based simulation

    Joachim Wahle;Ana Lúcia C Bazzan;Franziska Klügl;Michael Schreckenberg

Frequent Co-Authors

Boris S. Kerner
Boris S. Kerner University of Duisburg-Essen
Christian Wietfeld
Christian Wietfeld TU Dortmund University
Reinhard Selten
Reinhard Selten University of Bonn
Kai Nagel
Kai Nagel Technical University of Berlin
Nikolaus Rajewsky
Nikolaus Rajewsky Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine
Katsuhiro Nishinari
Katsuhiro Nishinari University of Tokyo
Thomas Guhr
Thomas Guhr University of Duisburg-Essen
Ana L. C. Bazzan
Ana L. C. Bazzan Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Dirk Helbing
Dirk Helbing ETH Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to a variety of engineering and technology career pathways. Many students and professionals now choose flexible study options, allowing them to balance advanced learning with work or other commitments.

For those looking to advance their leadership skills, consider the best online master's in organizational leadership. This program can benefit engineers interested in moving into management roles.

Operations management is another popular focus. An mba programs in operations management offers specialized coursework relevant to process optimization and technology-driven environments.

The path to an MBA is also becoming more accessible. Many mba programs online no gmat offer streamlined admissions, so you can focus on your career goals without standardized test barriers.

Affordability is a common concern for prospective students. There are high-quality online mba under $35k programs, making it easier to enhance your credentials without overwhelming debt.

Best Scientists Citing Michael Schreckenberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles